Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:15:29.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Date and Occasion of the Pervigilium Veneris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

D. S. Robertson
D. S. Robertson
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , July 1938 , pp. 109 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 110 note 1 All these attempts are discussed by Sir Cecil Clementi in the Introduction to his ‘Pervigilium Veneris’, third edition, 1936.

page 110 note 2 For chronology I rely chiefly upon Groag and Ensslin in R.-E. 16.

page 110 note 3 Klio ii, p. 237.Google Scholar

page 111 note 1 R.-E. xiv 2528, 54 ff. and 2467, 68 ff.

page 111 note 2 Dessau, Inscr. Lat. Sel. i, 672.

page 111 note 3 Our knowledge of Candidianus is wholly wived from De mort.De mort pers.

page 111 note 4 Epit. Aur. Vict. xi. 1 and 18, Zosim. ii. 8. 1: ‘meus affinis’ De mort. pers. 18. 14 must be a loose expression.

page 112 note 1 See Baehrens, , F.P.R. p. 405Google Scholar.