Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T13:20:19.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Agatharchides F. Gr. Hist. 86 F 8

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

John Buckler
Affiliation:
University of Illinois

Extract

This incident has never found its place either in the history of the Theban hegemony or in the life of Epameinondas, and even Jacoby's commentary on the the fragment sheds virtually no light on the matter.

The first problem is to determine the location of Sidai, and the only clues tothat are the fact that the pomegranate grew there in abundance and that the place was on the Boiotian-Attic border. Although the early travellers are generally silent on this subject, C. Bursian suggested that Sidai was located in the fertile Skourta plain or else in the Oropia, and in this he was followed by Zwicker in RE.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 333 note 1 It is not mentioned by Grote, G., History of Greece, x (London, 1869), 47Google Scholar; Stern, E. von, Geschichte der spartanischen und thebanischen Hegemonie (Dorpat, 1884), pp.208–9Google Scholar; Beloch, K. J., Griechische Geschichte (Berlin and Leipzig, 1922), 1112.1. 189–90Google Scholar; Fortina, M., Epaminonda (Turin, 1958), pp.71–2.Google Scholar

page 333 note 2 See F.Gr.Hist. II C 152.Google Scholar

page 333 note 3 Bursian, , Geographie von Griechenland, i (Leipzig, 1862), 249Google Scholar; Zwicker, , RE iiA (1923), 2209–10.Google ScholarGeyer, , RE iiA (1923), 2207–8, who called Sidai ‘eine…strittige Landschaft’, contented himself with quoting Agatharchides without suggesting where Sidai was located.Google Scholar

page 333 note 4 Personal communication of 5 Oct. 1975.

page 333 note 5 72 (1971), 61–2. Professor Vanderpool kindly drew my attention to this article.Google Scholar

page 333 note 6 Müller, C., Fragmenta Historicorum Graecorum, iii (Paris, 1884), 193Google Scholar, had earlier suggested that Sidai was perhaps located in the region of Oropos. Although Schaefer, A., Demosthenes und seine Zeit, i (Leipzig, 1856), 94 n.1, referred to Müller's suggestion, he did not commit himself on this point.Google Scholar

page 333 note 7 Xen, . He11.7.4.1Google Scholar; Diod.15.71.1; Isok. 5.53; Aischin.2.164; 3.85 and schol.; Dem. 18.99 and schol.; and schol. to Dem.21.64. For chronology, see Roy, J., Historia 20 (1971), 592.Google Scholar

page 333 note 8 Xen, . He11.7.4.1Google Scholar; see also Sealey, R., Historia 5 (1956), 195.Google Scholar

page 334 note 1 Frazer, J. G., Pausanias's Description of Greece, ii (London, 1913), 463 ff.Google Scholar

page 334 note 2 Diod, .14.17.13.Google Scholar

page 334 note 3 The alleged Achaian arbitration mentioned by Polybios, (2.39.810)Google Scholar and Strabo(8.7.1) is certainly not authentic (see Walbank, F. W., A Historical Commentary onPolybius, i (Oxford, 1957), 266–7) andhas no bearing on this problem.Google Scholar

page 334 note 4 Isokrates too claimed (5.53) [sc. Oropos]But even though Isokrates was fully a contemporary of theseevents, his testimony must be dealt with carefully, for Cloche, P., Revue bistorique, 193 (1942), 277–96, has amply proved Isokrates’ deep and abiding hatred of the Thebans.Google Scholar