Article contents
A Biographical Source on Phaiax and Alkibiades?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
No recent scholar has ever seriously maintained the genuineness of [Andokides] Oration IV, Against Alkibiades. Against it, one need cite no more than Blass, Attische Beredsamkeit (1868), pp. 325–31; Jebb, Attic Orators (1876), vol. i, pp. 133–9; an(i now more recently Raubitschek's learned and interesting article in T.A.P.A., vol. lxxix (1948), pp. 191–210. The speech is quite ‘out of character’ for Andokides, who was certainly far too young ever to have been in danger of ostrakism as an alternative victim to Nikias or Alkibiades; and there is no reasonable doubt that its ‘dramatic date’ is early in 415, and its ostensible speaker Phaiax, the clever young orator of Aristophanes' Knights (1377 ff.), ambassador to Sicily in 422 (Thk. 5. 4–5; cf. our speech § 42, which adds Macedonia and Epeiros) and butt of Eupolis on divers occasions (Plut. Alk. 13, Athenaios 3. 106b). These conclusions, however, leave open certain other material questions, especially that of the real date of the composition, on which in turn depends the question how far it can be legitimately used as an historical or biographical source.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1954
References
1 Here one must add that there is no serious difficulty about the discrepancy of the names, Diomedes here but Tisias in Isokrates' speech. That speech was written for delivery some 20 years after the event; Diomedes may well have died in the mean-time, and Tisias may have been his heir, or a partner with him in the original expensive enterprise.
- 4
- Cited by