Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T02:35:22.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Peace Movement and the Religious Community in Germany, 1900–1914

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Roger Philip Chickering
Roger Philip Chickering
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of History, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The prominence of American and European clergymen in recent demonstrations in favor of international peace has been a source of encouragement to those who believe that war contradicts the most fundamental tenets of Christianity. However, it is a well known fact that Christian institutions have historically found it possible not only to tolerate the use of violence to settle international disputes, but even to advocate it with enthusiasm. The tendency of clergymen to view war as a necessary or desirable component of international relations was particularly pronounced in the decades immediately preceding the outbreak of the first world war, when churchmen found themselves caught up in the nationalistic frenzy that poisoned relations among the major European powers. The religious community in Germany was especially susceptible to this kind of belligerent nationalism and indeed ranked as one of the most patriotic sectors of Wilhelmine society. Perhaps nowhere was this orientation more evident than in the relations between the religious community and the organized peace movement in Germany.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , September 1969 , pp. 300 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Siemering, Carl Ludwig, “Tolstoi und der Pazifismus,” Die Friedensblätter, V (1904), 110Google Scholar (hereafter cited FB); Die Friedenswarte, XII (1910), 221–22Google Scholar (hereafter cited FW); Der Völkerfriede, XIV (1913), 38Google Scholar (hereafter cited VF); cf. XVIIIe congrès universel de la paix à Stockholm. Du ler au 5 août 1910 (Stockholm, 1911), pp. 218–37.Google Scholar On the categorization of varieties of pacifism see Beales, A.C.F., The History of Peace (London, 1931), pp. 5–8, 332–34.Google Scholar

2. Dietz, Alexander, Franz Wirth und der Frankfurter Friedensverein (Frankfurt a.M., 1911), p. 19Google Scholar; cf. Wehberg, Hans, Gutachten: Deutschland und die Friedensbewegung: Sonderabdruck aus Das Werk des Untersuchungsaussehusses der Verfassungsgebenden Deutschen Nationalversammlung und des Deutschen Reichstages, 1919–1930Google Scholar, Reihe, Erste, Die Vorgeschichte des Weltkrieges, Band V, II (Berlin, n.d.), 87–88,Google Scholar

3. FB, VI (1905), 129; FW, III (1901), 144.

4. Fried, Alfred H., “Die Ausgestaltung der Friedensaktion in Deutschland,” FW, IV (1902), 145Google Scholar; VF, XV (1914), 75.

5. FW, IV (1902), 145, 149; Abrams, Irwin Martin, “A History of European Peace Societies, 1867–1899” (Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard, 1938), p. 271.Google Scholar

6. This state of affairs in the German Peaee Society was exploited by British propaganda during the second world war: see Smith, Rennie, Peace Verboten (London, 1943), pp. 19–20.Google Scholar

7. Cf. Dietz, pp. 68–73; Deutsche Friedensgesellschaft, Königsberg, Ortsgruppe, Jahresbericht, 1910 (Königsberg, 1911), pp. 13–16Google Scholar; FB, VII (1906), 45; FW, XV (1913), 364–65.

8. Goldscheid, Rudolf (ed.), Alfred H. Fried: Eine Sammlung von Gedänkblättern (Leipzig, 1922), pp. 32–33.Google Scholar

9. John Mez to David Starr Jordan. Munich, 11 June 1914. Jordan Peace Collection, Hoover Institution, Stanford University; cf. FB, IX (1908), 63; FW, XIV (1912), 11; Fick, Heinz, Der deutsche Militaresmus der Vorkriegszeit (Potsdam, 1932), pp. 71–75.Google Scholar

10. Alfred H. Fried, “Die deutsche Sozialdemokratie und die Friedensbewegung,” FW, V (1903), 101; Vorwärts, 1 May 1908; cf. FW, X (1908), 92–93. At the 1906 International Socialist Congress in London the delegates approved a resolution calling for socialist parliamentarians to participate alongside their bourgeois colleagues in the Interparliamentary Union. German socialists at this congress energetically opposed the resolution: FB, VII (1906), 105.

11. See for instance Stengel, Karl von, Weltstaat und Friedensproblem (Berlin, 1909)Google Scholar; Jähns, Max, Ueber Krieg und Frieden (2nd ed., Berlin, 1893)Google Scholar; Stauff, Philipp, Der Krieg und die Friedensbestrebungen unserer Zeit (n.p., 1907)Google Scholar; Wehrverein, Deutscher, Die Friedensbewegung und ihre Gefahren für das deutsche Volk (Berlin, 1914).Google Scholar Surely the most famous proponent of this kind of view was Heinrich von Treitschke. See his Politics, (2 vols., New York, 1916), esp. I, 65–67Google Scholar; II, 599.

12. For clear statements of this kind of thinking see: Lucht, J., 40 Erwägungen über Religion und Weltfrieden (Berlin, 1908), esp. pp. 3–4Google Scholar; Nithack-Stahn, Walther, Völkerfriede? Ein Streitgespräch (Stuttgart, n.d.), pp. 37, 46Google Scholar; Bulletin officiel du XVIe congrès universel de la paix. Tenu à Munich du 9 au 14 septembre 1907 (Berne, 1908), pp. 151–152Google Scholar; Umfrid, Otto, Europa den Europäern (Esslingen a.N, 1913), p. 31Google Scholar; Correspondence bi-mensuelle, XI (1906), 42Google Scholar (hereafter cited CBM).

13. Geisswein, Alexander, Der Friede Christi (Vienna, 1913)Google Scholar; CBM, VIII (1903), 86.

14. Nithack-Stahn, W., Kirche und Vaterland (Berlin, 1914).Google Scholar

15. VF, XIV (1913), 63, 121. Opponents of the peace movement enjoyed pointing out the bonds that seemed to link religious pacifism and atheistic social democracy: see Litzmaun, K., “Geistlicher Antimilitarismus,” in Deutscher Wehrverein, p. 13.Google Scholar

16. Vanderpol, A., “Les sociétés catholiques de la paix,” Almanach de la paix (1911), pp. 61–64Google Scholar; Rade, Martin, Der Beitrag der christlichen Kirchen zur internationalen Verständigung (Stuttgart, 1912), pp. 5–6Google Scholar; Baker, Robert Parsons, “The Belgians and the European Peace Movement, 1889–1914” (unpublished M.A. Thesis, Stanford University, 1962), pp. 49–50Google Scholar; Abrams, p. 286; VF, XIII (1912), 117–18; cf. Umfrid, “Ein Jahr der französischen Friedensbewegung,” FB, IV (1903), 132.Google Scholar

17. A. Vanderpol, “Mes pérégrinations: Impressions d'un propagateur du pacifisme dans les milieux catholiques,” Almanach de la paix (1912), p. 59Google Scholar; “Die Katholiken und der Friede,” VF, XIII (1912), 118; VF, XIV (1913), 127; cf. VP, XI (1910), 44.

18. Cf. Nithack-Stahn, , Streitgespräch, p. 43.Google Scholar

19. “Die Stellung der Geistlichkeit zur Friedensbewegung,” FB, V (1904), 12–13.Google Scholar; FB, IX (1908), 115; Rade, p. 9; cf. VF, XIII (1912), 107.

20. “Der Pazifismus und das kirchliche Berlin,” VF, XV (1914), 88; CBM, IX (1904) 18; VP, XII (1911), 40; CBM, XIV (1909), 124.

21. Rade, p. 14; VF, XIII (1912), 109.

22. Richter, A., “Freundschaft zwischen England und Deutschland,” FB, IX (1908), 143Google Scholar; Nithack-Stahn, , Streitgespräch, p. 36Google Scholar; The Herald-of Peace, 1 03 1909, pp. 237–38Google Scholar; VF, XIV (1913), 8; FB, VIII (1907), 21, 58, 78.

23. “Aus der pazifistischen Kilnik,” FW, VII (1905), 54.Google Scholar

24. See “Die internationale Friedensbewegung und die evangelische Geistlichkeit,” FB, V (1904), 54.Google Scholar

25. Grossmann, Otto in Monatsblätter für den gesamten deutschen Protestantismus (12 1910),Google Scholar cited in VP, XII (1911), 9.

26. O. Umfrid, “Das Evangelium und der Krieg,” VF, XII (1911), 9–11; Rohleder, Th., “Der Pietismus und die Friedensvereine,” VP, XIV (1913), 132Google Scholar; FB, IV (1903), 117; FB, VII (1906), 15. Although it was unusual, some churchmen managed to start from these theological presuppositions and arrive at pacifism; see Flügge, C. A., Gegenwartsnöte: Aus dem Zeitenspiegel der Tagespresse (Kassel, n.d.), pp. 44–45.Google Scholar

27. Rade, p. 13; FB, VI (1905), 56; von Stengel, Karl, Der ewige Friede (3rd ed., Munich, 1899), p. 12.Google Scholar

28. Rogge, , “Nochmals geistlieher Antimilitarismus,” in Deutscher Wehrverein, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

29. Stengel, , Der ewige Friede, pp. 11–12Google Scholar; “Kirche und Friedensbewegung,” VF, XV (1914), 89–90.Google Scholar

30. Koester, Otto, “Gegner der Friedensbewegung,” Nord und Süd, XXXVIII (08 1914), 160–61.Google Scholar

31. Ibid., p. 166; Umfrid, O., “Wurzelechte Pazifisten,” VF, XIV (1913), 126.Google Scholar

32. FW, XIV (1912), 429–30. See also for instance Ferdinand Kattenbuach, , Das sittliche Recht des Krieges (Giessen, 1906)Google Scholar; cf. Rade, p. 14.

33. Umfrid, O., “Meine Vortragsreise in Elsas” VF, XII (1911), 12.Google Scholar

34. Schücking, Walther, Neue Ziele der staatlichen Entwicklung (2nd and 3rd ed., Marburg, 1913), pp. 72–43, 78.Google Scholar

35. Siemering, C. L., “Ein Friedenssontag in Deutschland,” FW, XI (1909), 57Google Scholar; “Peace Sunday in Prussia,” Herald of Peace, 1 03 1909, pp. 237–38.Google Scholar

36. Elsbeth and Friedrich Friedrichs, M., Der Völkerfriede und die Religion (Gautzsch b. Leipzig, 1910), pp. 1, 5–6Google Scholar; (CBM, XV (1910), 64.

37. “Die Einrichtung des Friedenssontags in Elsass-Lothingen,” VF, XV (1914), 50–53Google Scholar; VF, XV (1914), 90Google Scholar; cf. The Peace Movement, III (1914), 230Google Scholar (hereafter cited PM).

38. XVIe Congrès Bulletin, pp. 93–94Google Scholar; “Friedensbewegung und Geistlichkeit,” FB, IX (1908), 7.Google Scholar

39. CBM, XIII (1908), 34; FB, IX (1908), 72; cf. FB, IX (1908), 136.

40. PM, (1913), 146; VF, XIV (1913), 63; Wagner, , “Friedensbewegung und Kirche,” in Umfrid, O., ed., Der Wehrverein, eine Gefahr fü das deutsche Volk (Esslingen, 1914), pp. 24–25Google Scholar; Koester, , “Gegner der Friedensbewegung,” pp. 159–60Google Scholar; Umfrid, , “Mobilmachung der Kirehen gegen den Krieg,” FW, XV (1913), 210.Google Scholar

41. “Ein kirchliches Friedenskomitee,” VF, XI (1910), 24; Wehberg, Hans, Die Führer der deutschen Friedensbegung (Leipzig, 1923), pp. 45–46Google Scholar; Rade, p. 10.

42. Umfrid, O., “Die Stellung der alten Kirche zum Kriegsdienst,” FB, IX (1908), 33–36, 47–48, 62–63Google Scholar; Weinel, , “Christentum und Patriotismus,” FB, IX (1908), 83.Google Scholar

43. For a recent statement of the thesis that Harnack 's work represents “historical axiology,” see Glick, G. Wayne, The Reality of Christianity: A Study of Adolf Harnack as. Historian and Theologian (New York, 1967).Google Scholar

44. FW, XII (1910), 84; VF, XI (1910), 58; Rade, p. 16.

45. VF, XI (1910), 77–78; Rade, p. 12.

46. Fried, Alfred H., Handbuch der Friedensbewegung (2nd ed., 2 vols., Berlin and Leipzig, 1911–1913), II, 254ff.Google Scholar; Fried, Alfred H., “Le developpement récent du Pacifisme allemand,” La paix par le droit, XX (07 1910), 402–410.Google Scholar

47. Nürnberger, Richard, “Imperialismus, Sozialismus and und Christentum bei Friedrich Naumann,” Historische Zeitschrift. CLXX (1950), 528–33Google Scholar; Shanahan, William O., “Friedrich Naumann: A Mirror of Wilhelminian Germany,” Review of Politics, XIII (1951), 292–94.Google Scholar Professor Shanahan does not account for Naumanns 'a activity in the Verband. Cf. “Friedrich Naumanna Wandlung zum Pazifismus,” FW. XI (1909), 215–16Google Scholar; “Friedrich Naumanna Stellungnahme zum Pazifismus,” FW, XIV (1912), 389–90.Google Scholar

48. Deutsche Friedensgesellschaft. Königsberg, Ortsgruppe, Jahresbericht, 1911–12 (Königsberg, 1912), p. 5Google Scholar; see also Rade, p. 9; FB, VI (1905), 34; FB, IX (1908), 65; VF, XV (1914), 9.