Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:13:14.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Origins of Clerical Celibacy in the Western Church

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Charles A. Frazee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the present discussion within the Roman Catholic Church over the requirement of clerical celibacy, the arguments generally center on the ascetical value of the practice. Pope Paul VI speaks of celibacy as a “precious jewel” leading to a life of selflessness for the man who seeks to follow Jesus Christ in the priesthood. When priests themselves talk about the subject, it is often in terms of its symbolic value as a total commitment to the service of the Lord. It is further seen as a practical measure, following Saint Paul's view that the married state frees the ordained minister from the cares of personal family life so that he may devote himself entirely to the concerns of the whole Christian community.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , June 1972 , pp. 149 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1900

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. “The unmarried man cares for the Lord's business; his aim is to please the Lord. But the married man cares for worldly things; his aim is to please his wife, and he has a divided mind.” I Corinthians 7:32–3.I Corinthians 7:32–3.

2. It is not the purpose of this article to discuss the scriptural texts concerning celibacy. This has been done by Bunnik, B. J., “The Question of Married Priests,” Cross Currents, XV, 4 (Fall, 1965), 407–414Google Scholar; Blenkinsopp, Joseph, Celibacy, Ministry, Church (New York, 1968)Google Scholar, and Quesnell, Quentin, “Make Themselves Eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven (Mt. 19:12),” Catholic Biblical Quarterly, XXX (July, 1968), 335–358.Google Scholar The only major English work on the history of celibacy to date is unfortunately very biased. See Lea, Henry C., History of Sacerdotal Celibacy in the Christian Church (London, 1907).Google Scholar

3. On this subject see Knox, Bonald, Enthusiasm (New York, 1950)Google Scholar, and Von Campenhausen, Hans, Tradition and Life in the Church, trans, by Littledale, A. V. (London, 1968), p. 233.Google Scholar

4. Irenaeus, , Against the Heresies 1.28Google Scholar in Migne, J. P., ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: series graeca (Paris, 1857–66), VII, Pt. 1, 690.Google Scholar Hereafter PG. Rigorist ideas later passed into Montanism and Manichaeism.

5. Home, Clement of, Epistle to the Corinthians 38.2, in PG, I, 283Google Scholar; Antioch, Ignatius of, Epistle to Polycarp 5.2, in PG, V, 273.Google Scholar See also Von Hamack, Adolf, The Mission and Expansion of Christianity in the First Three Centuries, trans, by James, Moffat (London, 1908), pp. 212–13Google Scholar, and Schillebeecks, Edward, Celibacy (New York, 1968), pp. 21 ff.Google Scholar

6. Dodds, E. R., Pagan and Christian in an Age of Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety (Cambridge, 1965), pp. 7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Goguel, Maurice, The Primitive Church, trans, by Snape, H. C. (New York, 1964), p. 539Google Scholar; Grant, Frederick C., Roman Hellenism and the New Testament (New York, 1962), pp. 51–75.Google Scholar

7. Exhortation to Chastity 13, conclusion, in Migne, J. P., ed., Patrologiae oursus completus: scriptores latini (Paris, 1844–64), II, 978.Google Scholar Hereafter PL.

8. This development is traced in Von Campenhansen, Hans, Ecclesiastical Authority and Spiritual Power in the Church of the First Three Centuries, trans, by Baker, J. A. (Stanford, 1969), pp. 76–123.Google Scholar

9. Carthage, Cyprian of, Letter to the priests, deacons and people abiding in Furni 1.Google Scholar 1: “… everyone honored by the divine priesthood and consecrated for the clerical ministry ought only to serve the altar and the sacrifices and to have time for prayers and petitions.” Cyprian: Letters, trans, by SrDonna, Rose. Vol. 51 of The Fathers of The Church, ed. by Deferrari, Joseph (Washington, 1964), 3.Google Scholar

10. Didascalia Apostolorun, IV, ed. by Connolly, R. Hugh (Oxford, 1929), p. 32.Google Scholar On Ephesus, see Eusebius, , The History of the Church, 5.24.6–7 in PG, XX, 493Google Scholar and on Egypt, Alexandria, Clement of, Stromata 3.12.90 in PG, VIII, 1188.Google Scholar

11. Harnack, Adolph, History of Dogma, trans, by Buchanan, Neil (New York, 1958), I, 176.Google Scholar

12. Ex. 19.15; Lev. 7.19–20; 15.16; 22.4 ff; I Sam. 21.4; Ezk. 44.9. The Jewish priest-hood went through its “sacralizing” period after its return from the Babylonian captivity; see Noth, Martin, The History of Israel (New York, 1958), pp. 314ff.Google Scholar The best presentation on this subject is the chapter “La sacralisation du service pastoral et les origines de la loi du célibat ecclesiastique,” in Audet, Jean-Paul, Mariage et Célibat dans le service pastoral de l'Église (Paris, 1967), pp. 117–137Google Scholar; see also Hödl, L., “Die lex continentiae—Eine Problem gesehichtliche Studie über dem Zölibat,” Zeitschrift fur Katholische Theologie LXXIII (1961), 325–344;Google Scholar

13. Hastings, James, ed., Dictionary of the Bible; rev. ed. by Grant, F. C. and Bowley, H. H. (New York, 1963), p. 166Google Scholar; McKenzie, John L., Dictionary of the Bible (Milwaukee, 1956), p. 141Google Scholar; James, E. O., The Nature and Function of Priesthood (New York, 1955), pp. 177–78.Google Scholar

14. Williams, George H., “The Ministry of the Ante-Nicene Church” in The Ministry in Historical Perspective, Niebuhr, R. and Williams, D., eds. (New York, 1956), p. 28.Google Scholar

15. Durkheim, Emile, The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, trans, by Swain, J. W. (London, 1915), p. 309.Google Scholar See also Eliade, Mircea, Patterns in Comparative Religion, trans, by Sheed, B. (New York, 1958), pp. 14–15.Google Scholar

16. Smith, W. Robertson, Lectures on the Beligion of the Semites (New York, 1889), pp. 435–436Google Scholar; Patai, Baphael, Sex and Family in the Bible and.the Middle East (New York, 1959), pp. 152–64.Google Scholar Muslims must abstain from sex on the pilgrimage to Mecca.

17. A collection of these temple inscriptions can be found in Nock, Arthur D., Early Gentile Christianity and Its Hellenistic Background (New York, 1964), pp. 17–20.Google Scholar

18. Rose, H. J., Ancient Roman Religion (London, 1948), p. 36.Google ScholarNumen compares to the Polynesian mana.

19. Rose, H. J., “The Bride of Hades,” Classical Philology, XX (Jan.-Oct, 1925), 241.Google Scholar See also Cook, A. B., Zeus (Cambridge, 1940) I, 394–95.Google Scholar

20. George J. Williams comments on the forms of Christian ministry: “We know that these three kinds of ministry of the New Testament epoch were modeled in part on Jewish and pagan precedent and we shall take note of the extent to which they were elaborated in self conscious polemical parallelism alongside these rival institutions on the assumption that Christians were the militia of Christ under the heavenly emperor and the true or new or ongoing Israel of God.” (Williams, , op. cit., p. 37).Google Scholar

21. Mansi, Joannes D., ed., Sacrorum Conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, New ed. (Paris, 1901–1906), II, 2, 406Google Scholar; Hefele, K. J. and Leclercq, H., Histoire des Conoiles (Paris, 1907–1921), I, 1, 212–64.Google Scholar

22. Audet, , op. cit., pp. 27–33Google Scholar; Blenkinsopp, , op. cit., p. 48.Google Scholar

23. Conoiliorum Oecumenicorum Decreta, ed. Centro di Documentazione Istituto per le Scienze Religiose (Basel, 1962), p. 5Google Scholar; Socrates, , Historia ecolesiastica 1.11, in 1.11, in PG LXVII, 101–104Google Scholar; Sozomen, , Historia Ecelesiastica 1.23, in 1.23, in PG, LXVII, 925.Google Scholar

24. Bailey, Derrick S., The Man-Woman Relation in Christian Thought (London, 1959), p. 33.Google Scholar The women were called subintroductae.

25. Decarreaux, Jean, Monks and Civilization, trans, by Haldane, C. (London, 1964), 70–117.Google Scholar See also Waddell, Helen, The Desert Fathers (Ann Arbor, 1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Knowles, David, From Paohomius to Ignatius (Oxford, 1966), p. 5.Google Scholar

26. Hefele-Leclercq, , op. cit., I, 2, 1029–49.Google Scholar

27. Caesarea, Basil of, On Virginity 2. app., in PG, XXX, 671.Google Scholar

28. Great, Gregory the, Dialogues 2.2, in PL, LXVI, 132.Google Scholar

29. Ambrose, , Concerning the offices of the ministers 1.50, in PL, XVI, 97–8.Google Scholar

30. Eusebius, , Demonstration of the Gospel 1.9, in PG, XXII, 81.Google Scholar

31. Jerome, , Against Jovinianum 1.20, in PL, XXIII, 249.Google Scholar

32. Jerusalem, Cyril of, Catechism 13.25, in PG, XXIII. 758.Google Scholar

33. Bailey, , op. cit., p. 73.Google Scholar

34. Damasus, , Letter to the Bishops of Gaul, in PL, XIII, 1181–96Google Scholar, here attributed to Siricus.

35. Siricus, , Letter to Himerius of Tarragona, in PL, LVI, 558–59.Google Scholar The same sentiments axe to be found in this pope's Letter to the African Bishops, PL, LVI, 728.

36. Leo, , Letter to Rusticus of Narbonne, in PL, LIV, 1204.Google Scholar

37. Theodosius, , Codex, XVI, 2.44Google Scholar in Theodosiani Libri XVI, Mommsen, T. and Krueger, P., eds., (Berlin, 1954)Google Scholar 1.851; Justinian, , Codex, I, 3.47Google Scholar; Novellae VI, 1 and CXXIII, 1 in Corpus Juris Civilis, Krueger, P., ed. (Berlin, 1959), II, 34; III, 37, 594.Google Scholar

38. Biluniuk, Petro, “Celibacy and the Eastern Tradition” in Celibacy, Frein, G. H., ed. (New York, 1968), pp. 44 ff.Google Scholar

39. Delhaye, P., “Celibacy,” New Catholic Encyclopedia, III, 374Google Scholar; Hughes, Philip, A History of the Church (New York, 1949), II, 199–201.Google Scholar

40. Gregory, , Letter to Peter, Subdeacon of Sicily, in PL LXXVII, 506.Google Scholar

41. Schillebeeckx, , op. cit., p. 42Google Scholar; Bunnik, , op. cit., p. 418Google Scholar; Bailey, , op. cit., p. 148.Google Scholar

42. Knowles, David and Obolensky, Dimitri, The Middle Ages. Vol. 2 of The Christian Centuries (London, 1969), pp. 51 ff.Google Scholar

43. Stutz, Ulrich, “The Proprietary Church as an Element of Medieval Germanic Ecclesiastical Law,” in Barraclough, Geoffrey, ed., Medieval Germany, 911–1850 (Oxford, 1948), pp. 35–70.Google Scholar

44. Ibid., p. 45. At the beginning of the ninth century, for example, in the diocese of Chur the bishop had 31 churches, the king and nobility owned 200.

45. Boyd, Catherine, Titles and Parishes in Medieval Italy (Ithaca, 1952), p. 92.Google Scholar

46. Amann, Emile and Dumas, August, L'Eglise an pouvoir des laiques. Vol. 7 of Histoire de l'Eglise, ed., by Fliche, A. and Martin, V. (Paris, 1948), 270 ff.Google Scholar

47. Ibid., p. 268; Thompson, James W., Economic and Social History of the Middle Ages (New York, 1928), II, 650 ff.Google Scholar

48. Pelagius, , Letter to the Patrician Cethego, in PL, LXIX, p. 414.Google Scholar

49. Amman, and Dumas, , op. cit., pp. 478–80.Google Scholar

50. Darlington, R. R., “Ecclesiastical Reform in the Late Old English Period,” English Historical Review, LI (1936), p. 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51. Constantine, Life of Adalberon, XXV in Monumenta Germaniae Eistorica, Seriptores; II, 667.Google Scholar Hereafter MGH.

52. Worms, Burchard of, Decree III, in PL, CXL, 645–46.Google Scholar

53. Vercelli, Atton of, Epistle Nine, in PL, CXXXIV, 116–17.Google Scholar

54. Knowles, , op. cit., pp. 17–20.Google Scholar

55. Cowdrey, H. E. J., Cluniacs and the Gregorian Reform (Oxford, 1970), pp. 121 ff.Google Scholar

56. Bloch, Mare, Feudal Society, trans, by Manyon, L. A. (Chicago, 1964), II, 345.Google Scholar

57. Verona, Ratlier of, Letters, in PL, CXXXVI, 585–86.Google Scholar

58. Mansi, , op. cit., V, 19, 503.Google Scholar

59. Mann, Horace, The Lives of the Popes in the Middle Ages, 590–1304 (London, 1902–1932), VI, 89.Google Scholar

60. Anselm, , History of the Dedication of the Church of St. Remigius, in PL, CXLII, 1417–20Google Scholar; Southern, R. W., The Making of the Middle Ages (New Haven, 1953), pp. 125–27Google Scholar; and Tierney, Brian, The Crisis of Church and State, 1050–1800 (Englewood Cliffs, 1964), pp. 31, 32.Google Scholar

61. Bremen, Adam of, Deeds of the Bishops of the Church of Hamburg, in MGH, VII, pp. 346–347.Google Scholar

62. Damian, Peter, Various Works, in PL, CLIV.Google Scholar His books are found in PL, CLV, 159–90; 379–88.

63. Blum, Owen J., St. Peter Damian: His Teaching on the Spiritual Life, in Studies in Mediaeval History, New Series: Catholic University of America (Washington, 1947), 87–97, 175–76.Google Scholar

64. Damian, Peter, Letters, 7.18, in PL, CXLIV, 45.Google Scholar

65. Found in the MGH, Libelli de Lite (Hanover, 1891–97), pp. 95–253.Google Scholar

66. On Humbert, see Fliche, Augustin, La réforme grégorienne et la reconquête chrétienne, 1075–1125. Vol. 8 of Eistoire de l'Eglise, ed. by Fliche, A. and Martin, V. (Paris, 1944), pp. 16 ff.Google Scholar

67. Mansi, , op. cit., V, 19, 907.Google Scholar

68. Alexander, II, Historical Works, in PL CXLVI, 1383.Google Scholar

69. Ullman, Walter, The Growth of Papal Government in the Middle Ages, (London, 1955), p. 297Google Scholar n.; Cantor, Norman H., “The Crisis of Western Monasticism, 1050–1130,” American Historical Review, LXVI (October, 1960), 55 ff.Google Scholar

70. Southern, R. W., op. cit., p. 141.Google Scholar For another view, see Tellenbach, Gerd, Church and State at the Time of the Investiture Contest (Oxford, 1959), pp. 166 ff.Google Scholar

71. Gregory, , Letter to Bishop Otto of Constance, in Emerton, Ephraim, ed., The Correspondence of Pope Gregory VII (New York, 1932), p. 53.Google Scholar

72. Mansi, , op. cit., XX, 437–38.Google Scholar

73. Benson, Eobert, ed., Imperial Lives and Letters of the Eleventh Century, trans., by Mommsen, T. and Morrison, K. F. (New York, 1962), p. 149.Google Scholar

74. Brooke, C. N. L., “Gregorian reform in action: Clerical marriage in England, 1050–1200,” Cambridge Historical Journal, XII (1956), p. 11.Google Scholar

75. Southern, , op. cit., pp. 128–30.Google Scholar

76. Ullman, , op. cit., pp. 306–09Google Scholar; Barraclough, Geoffrey, The Medieval Papacy (New York, 1968), pp. 88–90.Google Scholar

77. Mansi, , op. cit., XX, 906.Google Scholar

78. Vitalis, Odericus, Church History, in Ross, V. B. and McLaughlin, M., Portable Medieval Reader (New York, 1960), p. 75.Google Scholar

79. Canon, 7 in Conciliorum Oecumenicorum Decreta, p. 167.Google Scholar

80. Canons 6 and 7, ibid., p. 174; Mansi, , op. cit., XXI, 715.Google Scholar