Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:42:39.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controversy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At some point in a debate one or all participants usually feel that it should come to an end. Professor Schwartz expresses this wish in his recent comments on my rejection of the “Maoist” thesis; but he does not tell us why. I also think the present discussion should be terminated; but I am quite willing to give my reasons. I see little benefit in continuing to argue the meaning of Mao Tse-tung's development with an opponent who employs methods of evasion, omission, and misrepresentation. However, the underlying issue has not disappeared, and certain points even in this debate require further clarification.

Type
Controversy
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 4 , December 1960 , pp. 88 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schwartz, Benjamin I., Chinese Communism and the Rise of Mao. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951), pp. 77Google Scholar et seq.; cf. p. 191 (hereafter cited as Schwartz 1951).

2 Brandt, Conrad, Schwartz, Benjamin, and Fairbank, John K., A Documentary History of Chinese Communism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1952), p. 78CrossRefGoogle Scholar (hereafter cited as Documentary History).

3 Schwartz, Benjamin I., “The Legend of the ‘Legend of “Maoism,”’” The China Quarterly, No. 2 (04–06), p. 36Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Schwartz 1960).

4 Ibid. p 36.

5 Ibid. p. 38.

6 See also the chapter on Communist peasant policy which I wrote for the Handbook of World Communism, edited by Joseph M. Bochenski and Gerhart Niemeyer and published originally in Germany. (The American edition will soon be put out by F. Praeger, New York.)

7 Schwartz, 1960, p. 41.Google Scholar

8 Schwartz, 1951, p. 189.Google Scholar

9 Documentary History, p. 77.Google Scholar

10 Schwartz, 1951, p. 117.Google Scholar

11 Wittfogel, Karl A., “The Legend of ‘Maoism’,” The China Quarterly, No. 1 (01–03 1960), p. 81et seq.Google Scholar

12 Schwartz, 1960, p. 40.Google Scholar

13 Schwartz suggests that he, Fairbank and Brandt do not constitute “an indivisible entity.” This is perfectly acceptable to me, since I never considered them an entity, except in the promotion of the “Maoist” thesis.

14 Schwartz, 1951, p. 193.Google Scholar

15 Deutscher, Isaac, The Prophet Armed. Trotsky: 1879–1921 (New York and London: Oxford University Press, 1954), pp. 373, 507.Google Scholar

16 Lenin, V. I., Selected Works. 12 vols. (New York: International Publishers, 1943), X, p. 242.Google Scholar

17 Trotsky, Leon, The First Five Years of the Communist International, trans, from the Russian and edited by Wright, John G.. 2 vols. (New York: Pioneer Publishers, 1945), I, p. 130.Google Scholar

18 Ibid. pp. 223, 237.

19 Trotsky, Leon, Permanent Revolution (Calcutta: Gupta Rahman & Gupta, 1947), p. 174.Google Scholar

20 Ibid.

21 Kershenzew, P., Das Leben Lenins (Basel: Verlag Freie Schweiz, 1937), p. 347Google Scholar; Schapiro, Leonard, The Communist Party of the Soviet Union (New York: Random House, 1959), p. 220Google Scholar (hereafter cited as Schapiro 1959).

22 In an appendix to his book, The Russian Revolution of 1905, which he then republished. The preface is dated March 18, 1922 (Die Russische Revolution 1905 [Berlin, 1923], p. 9).Google Scholar

23 Trotsky, Leon, The History of the Russian Revolution, trans, by Eastman, Max (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1932). 3 vols. Vol. I, p. 463.Google Scholar

24 Trotsky, Leon, Stalin. An Appraisal of the Man and his Influence, edited and trans, by Malamuth, Charles (New York and London: Harper's, 1941), p. 433.Google Scholar

25 See International Press Correspondence 1931, pp. 991, 992, 1029, 1040Google Scholar; Yakhontoff, Victor A., The Chinese Soviets (New York: Coward-McCann, 1934), pp. 237, 239et seq., 251.Google Scholar

28 Mao, , “On New Democracy” (Tse-tung, Mao, Selected Works, 4 vols. [New York: International Publishers, 1954 et seq.] III, p. 122 (hereafter cited as Mao, SW).Google Scholar

27 Documentary History, p. 275.Google Scholar

28 Mao, , SW, IV, pp. 98 and 102.Google Scholar

29 Documentary History, p. 261.Google Scholar

30 Weber, Max, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Sozial und Wirtschaftsgeschichte (Tübingen, 1924), p. 556.Google Scholar

31 See Fainsod, Merle, How Russia is Ruled (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1955), p. 421et seq.Google Scholar; Wolfe, Bertram D., “The Durability of Soviet Despotism,” Commentary (08 1957): 93–104Google Scholar; Schapiro, 1959, p. 213 and passimGoogle Scholar; Inkeles, Alex and Bauer, Raymond A., The Soviet Citizen. Daily Life in a Totalitarian Society (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959), p. 377et seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Seton-Watson, Hugh, Neither War Nor Peace (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1960), p. 238et seq.Google Scholar

1 Loc. cit. p. 36.Google Scholar

2 See p. 89 of this issue.

1 The China Quarterly, No. 2, p. 20.Google Scholar

2 Ibid. p. 20.

3 Ibid.

4 Asian Materials—International Press Correspondence: 1921–1927. Edited by Sjaardema, Henryk (Private Printing, 1959), p. 405.Google Scholar The preceding has been utilised because it allows a facile tracing of Comintern policy in Asia; since it is not generally available, I have included the location in the International Press Correspondence as well. See Inprecor, 1926, p. 649.Google Scholar

5 Asian Materials, op. cit., p. 405Google Scholar; Inprecor, op. cit., p. 649.Google Scholar

6 Ibid. pp. 482–485; Inprecor, 1926, pp. 1581–1583.Google Scholar

7 The Communist International, 12 30, 1926, p. 7Google Scholar; Inprecor, 1926, p. 1583.Google Scholar

8 Asian Materials, pp. 486–503.Google Scholar

9 Ibid. pp. 494–496.

10 Ibid. pp. 497–498.

11 Ibid. pp. 498–500.

12 Ibid. pp. 500–501.

13 Ibid. pp. 502–503; Inprecor, 1926, pp. 1607–1608.Google Scholar

14 Tse-tung, Mao, Selected Writings (Lawrence & Wishart, Ltd., 1955), Vol. I, p. 22.Google Scholar

15 The China Quarterly, op. cit. p. 20.Google Scholar

16 Ibid. p. 21.

17 The Communist International, 06 30, 1927, p. 201Google Scholar; for Bukharin's reiteration of this line see Inprecor, 1927, pp. 927–930.Google Scholar

18 See Stalin's policy speech of November 1926, reported in Inprecor, 1926, p. 1583.Google Scholar

19 The Communist International, op. cit.; Inprecor, 1927, pp. 927–930.Google Scholar