Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:20:25.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Dilemmas in Human Service Administration: The Case of Child Welfare*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Len Tierney
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

“Hands on”, “know the customer”, “stick to the knitting” – these are the key attributes of excellent organization; so is the message of a recent best selling text in management practice. Successful organizations specialize we are told. They do not produce “manufactures”, rather they produce particular manufactured products; hamburgers or microcomputers. When we turn to the human services, however, we note an increasing tendency to view tham as services, suigeneris, evoking a sense that we have pinned down a slice of reality about which we can think generically for purposes of policy and service provision. This view can be maintained only be asserting that there are no important differences in people's situations, by the use of bulk terms such as “children”, and “families” and by the simultaneous assertion that the important policy issues are organizational and managerial. T hat there are concepts that cut across categories is a reminder that there are, indeed, similarities between human beings and that we share a common culture but it is the real differences between target populations which provide anchorage for differential policies, programs and practice, rather than the similarities alone.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , Spring 1985 , pp. 1 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Footnotes

*

This paper was delivered at the Social Policy and Administration Conference Melbourne August 1985

References

1. Peters, Thomas & Waterman, Robert H. In Search of Excellence Harper & Row, New York 1979.Google Scholar
2. Parton, Nigel. The Politics of Child Abuse. Macmillan, London 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Tierney., L., Excluded Families doctural dissertation Columbia University 1975. L. Tierney., Children Who Need Help Melbourne University Press., Melbourne 1963. L. Tierney., A Future for St. Augustine's – publication restricted 1984. Research student work In progress touches on such subjects as the careers of state wards, volunteers in child welfare and case planning in child welfare.Google Scholar
4. Alcabes, Abraham and Jones, James A. “Structural Determinants of Clienthood” Social Work Vol. 30 No. 1 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Seabury, Brett. “Negotiating Sound Contracts with Clients”. Public Welfare vol. 37 1979 pp.33–38.Google Scholar
6. Alcabes, A., and Jones, J., Social Work op. cit.Google Scholar
7. Child Welfare Practice and Legislation Review Executive Summary. Division 5 pp. 20–22 Victorian Government Printer. Melbourne 1985.Google Scholar
8. Hasenfeld, Yeheskel. Human Service Organizations Prentice Hall N.J. 1979 pp. 377.Google Scholar
9. Mintzberg, Henry., The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice Hall N.J. 1979 pp.377–378.Google Scholar
10. Mintzberg, The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice Hall N.J. 1979 pp.377–378.Google Scholar
11. Carter, Jan., The Well-Being of the People 1984 W.A. Government Printer Perth W.A. and Lawrence, R. J., Responsibility For Service In Child Abuse and Child Protection Government Printer N.S.W. 1982.Google Scholar
12. Carter, Jan., The Well-Being of the People 1984 op cit.Google Scholar
13. Turner, Ian., Room for Manoeuvre Drummond, Melbourne, 1982 pp. 256–263.Google Scholar
14. Malucchio, Anthony., “Eduction and Training For Child Welfare Practice”: in ed. Joan, Laird. and Hartman, Ann A Handbook of Child Welfare The Free Press N. Y. 1985 pp. 755.Google Scholar
15. Davies, Bleddyn., “Strategic Goals and Piece meal Innovations: Adjusting to The New Balance of Needs and Resources” in ed. Goldberg, Matilda and Hatch, Stephen A New Look At the Personal Social Services Discussion Paper No. 4 Policy Studies Institute London 1981 pp. 46–64.Google Scholar
16. Scott, W.K., Organizations Prentice Hall N. J. 1981 pp. 230–232.Google Scholar
17. Senate Standing Committee on Social Welfare. Reference: An Examination of Children Under Institutional and Other Forms of Care. Official Hansard Report Canberra A. C. T. Submission No. 33 pp. 182–200 26/11/82.Google Scholar
18. Tropman, John., Policy Management in The Human Services Columbia U. P. N Y. 1984.Google Scholar
19. Wieck, Karl E., “Small Wins” American Psychologist Vol. 39, 1. pp. 40–49. 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Broskowski, Anthony., “Organizational Controls and Leadership” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice Vol. 15 No. 5 1984 pp. 645–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Kouzes, James M., and Mico, Paul R., “Domain Theory: An Introduction to Organizational Behaviour In Human Service Organizations” Jnl of Applied Behavioural Science 15. 4. 1979 pp. 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar