Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:20:48.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Proposed Ethical Guidelines for Work in the Human Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this article is to set forth some ethical practice guidelines for human service workers with less than professional qualifications.’ The growing awareness of social, behavioural and mental health problems in our society ranging from hyper-active children who cannot read to depressed housewives who cannot cope, has resulted in the need for more personnel in the human service fields. Increasingly, the helping professionals have been aided and abetted in their work by a growing number of aids or assistants who work undertheirdirection inthefields of psychiatry, psychology, social work, nursing, the ministry, the law and vocational and educational counselling. Sometimes referred to as the “new careers worker” (Golann and Eisdorfer: 1972) or the “new professional” (Dugger: 1975), such workers may have some preparation, some on-the-job staff development, but will have less than the traditional professional training. Among these workers are many individuals, mostly women who are utilized for their nurturing, home-making skills so important in residential settings for children and in foster homes. There are also workers who are indigenous to low-income or minority group areas who possess important knowledge for promoting programs and special skills at case finding. (Pearl and Reissman: 1965) In addition there are volunteers of all kinds, including former clients, working in both conventional and atypical agencies. Honorary Probationary Officers alone number approximately 900 in Victoria in 1980 and constitute a major support for individuals on probation. All of these workers face, just as professionals do, complex and ambiguous ethical questions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

References

American Psychological Association. Ethical Standards of Psychologists, Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1977.Google Scholar
Australian Association of Social Workers. Code of Professional Ethics. (1957)Google Scholar
Australian Psychological Society. Australian Psychological Society Code of Professional Conduct and Advice to Members 1970. Australian Psychologist, 1970, 5, 7595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugger, James G. The New Professional: Introduction for the Human Services/Mental Health Worker, Belmont, Cal: Wadsworth, 1975.Google Scholar
Golann, S.E. and Eisdorfer, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Community Mental Health, New York: Prentice-Hall, 1972 Google Scholar
Howe, Elizabeth, “Public Professions and the Private Model of Professionalism”, Social Work, Vol. 25, No. 3 (May 1980), pp. 179191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Code of Ethics for the Professional Social Worker”, Australian Association of Social Workers, Australian Social Workers Union News, 1976, March April, pp. 69.Google Scholar
Kelman, H.C., A Time To Speak: On Human Values and Social Research, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1968.Google Scholar
Levy, Charles, “On the Development of a Code of Ethics”, Social Work, 19 (March 1964), pp. 207216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association of Social Workers, Inc. (U.S.A.), Code of Ethics, 1960, and revised editions of 1967 and 1979.Google Scholar
Pearl, A., and Reissman, F., New Careers for the Poor: The Non-Professional in Human Service, New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar