Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:42:54.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incorporating Natural Family Members into Residential Programmes for Children and Youth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Frank Ainsworth  and
Patricia Hansen
Frank Ainsworth
Affiliation:
School of Social Work Phillip Institute of Technology Bundoora, Victoria
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Most agencies that provide residential services for children and youth make some attempt to work with natural family members; e.g. mother, father, grandmother, grandfather, sister, or brother of those placed within these programmes. Some common approaches to this include the employment of social workers or involvement of other social agencies to undertake this work. Alternatively, a member of the direct care staff in a residential programme may be designated as a family worker and required to make extra effort to maintain links between the child in the programme and the natural family. Under all of these arrangements, direct care practitioners in residential programmes are expected to be responsive to natural family members visiting a child in the programme. They are also expected to support a child planning to return home for a family visit or returning to the programme from such an event.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Winter 1986 , pp. 12 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

References

Ainsworth, F. and Hansen, P.: Once More with Feeling: Australian Child and Family Welfare; Vol. 10, No. 1/2 (1985)Google Scholar
Ainsworth, F. and Walker, M.: A Practice Curriculum for Group Care; Paper 14.2 Central Council for Education and Training in Social Work, London. (1983).Google Scholar
Cohen, S. and Warren, R.: Respite Care, Principles, Programmes and Policies; Pro-ed, Austin, Texas. (1985).Google Scholar
Conte, J.: The Group Care Worker as a Teacher of Parents: In Fulcher, L. C. and Ainsworth, F. (eds.) “Group Care Practice with Children”; Tavistock Publishers, London (1985).Google Scholar
Fanshel, D. and Shinn, E. B.: Children in Foster Care: A longitudinal investigation; Columbia University Press, New York (1978).Google Scholar
Hansen, P. and Ainsworth, F.: Family and Parenting Analogies in Australian Residential Child Care: A Time for Change; Australian Child and Family Welfare, Vol. 8, No. 3/4 (1983).Google Scholar
McCotter, D. and Oxnam, H.: Children in Limbo: An Investigation into the Circumstances and Needs of Children in Long Term Care in Western Australia. Unpublished Report; Department of Community Welfare, Perth, W.A. (1981).Google Scholar
Millham, S., Bullock, R., Hosie, K. and Haak, M.: Lost in Care, Gower, Aldershot (1986) (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
Oswin, M.: They Keep Going Away. King's Fund Publishing Office, London (1984)Google Scholar
Proch, K. and Howard, J.: Parental Visiting of Children in Foster Care, Social Work, Vol. 31, No. 3 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, J. K.: Caring for Troubled Children, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1979).Google Scholar