Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:41:53.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breach of duty: A new paradigm for the abuse of children and adolescents in care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Anne Forward
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of the issue of abuse in care reveals that common structures and processes for response to allegations operate within a paradigm of minimalist child protection and that this paradigm is inadequate to the effective management of the problem. The paper will argue that a shift of paradigm is required. Concepts of individual pathology and deficiency, conflicts of interest in reporting and investigation and tolerance for all but seriously inadequate care for children must be replaced. A paradigm of duty of care would result in policy and procedure which embraced agencies' moral and legal duties towards children and assessed allegations or harm from this holistic perspective.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , 1995 , pp. 19 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Besharov, D.J. & Besharov, S.H. (1985) The Vulnerable Social Worker USA: NASW, ch.5.Google Scholar
Braga, W. & Schimmer, R. (1993) ‘Experience with Alleged Sexual Abuse in Residential Program: II. Problems in the Management of Allegations’ Sexual Abuse and Residential Treatment, USA: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Carbino, R. (1992) ‘Policy and Practice for Response to Foster Families: When Child Abuse or Neglect is Reported’ Child Welfare, LXXI, (6), Nov.-Dec. 497–509.Google Scholar
Cashmore, J., Dolby, R, & Brennan, D. (1994) Systems Abuse: Problems and Solutions, NSW: Child Protection Council.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, J. (1992) ‘Children and Young People in Out-of-Home Care: Treating and Preventing Individual, Programmatic and Systems Abuse’ Children Australia, 17(2), 17–25.Google Scholar
Clarke, P.A.B. & Tonti-Filippini, N. (1986) ‘Obligation in a Caring Profession’ St. Vincent's Bio-ethics Centre Newsletter, 4, Jun., 3-7.Google Scholar
Creyke, R. & Weeks, P. (1985). Law and the Direct Care Worker, Canberra: Shield Press.Google Scholar
Dale, P., Davies, M., Morrison, T. & Waters, J. (1986) Dangerous Families: Assessment and Treatment of Child Abuse UK: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Durkin, R. (1982) ‘Institutional Child Abuse from a Family Systems Perspective: a working paper’. Child and Youth Services Review, 4, (1-2), 15–22.Google Scholar
Galbally, R. (1993) ‘Child Abuse and Children with Disabilities’ Aust. & N.Z. Journal of Family Therapy, 14(4), 225–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbarino, J., Guttman, E. & Wilson-Seeley, J. (1986) ‘Identifying Psychological Mistreatment Outside the Home’, The Psychologically Battered Child: Strategies for Identification, Assessment and Intervention, USA: Jossey Bass, Ch. 8.Google Scholar
Gil, E. (1982) ‘Institutional Abuse of Children in Out-of-Home Care’ Child & Youth Services Review, 4, (1-2), 7–13.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J., Freud, A., Solnit, A.J. & Goldstein, S. (1986) In the Best Interests of the Child, USA: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, L., Hughes, P. & Nicol, R. (1990) Report of the Inquiry into the Death of a Child in Care Matlock UK: Derbyshire County Council.Google Scholar
Hallet, C. & Stevenson, O. (1980) Child Abuse: Aspects of Interprofessional Co-operation, UK: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Harrell, S.A. & Orem, R.C. (1980) Preventing Child Abuse and Neglect: a guide for staff in residential institutions US: Dept of Health & Human Services.Google Scholar
Howitt, D. (1992) Child Abuse Errors: When Good Intentions Go Wrong, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Kelleher, M.A. (1987) ‘Investigating Institutional Abuse: A Post Substantiation Model’ Child Welfare,. LXVI, (4), Jul/Aug. 343–351.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.) US: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levy, A. & Kahan, B. (1991) The Pindown Experience and the Protection of Children: The Report of the Staffordshire Child Care Enquiry Stafford, UK: Staffordshire County Council.Google Scholar
Matsushima, J. (1990) ‘Interviewing for Alleged Abuse in the Residential Treatment Centre’ Child Welfare, LXIX, (4), Jul-Aug., 321–331.Google Scholar
Morrison, T. (1993) ‘Multi-disciplinary Collaboration - Dreams, Dangers and Demands’ (Unpublished paper)Google Scholar
Nunno, M.A. & Motz, J.K. (1988) ‘The Development of an Effective Response to the Abuse of Children in Out-of-Home Care’, Child abuse and neglect, 12, 521–528.Google Scholar
Nunno, M.A., Rindfleisch, N. & Docherty, J. (1990) The Abuse of Children in Out-of-Home Care, Presentation to Eighth International Congress on Child Abuse and Neglect, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
One Scandal Too Many: the case for comprehensive protection for children in all settings (1993) Report of a Working Group convened by the Gulbekian Foundation, Calouste Gulbekian Foundation, UK Google Scholar
Osborne, S.P. (1992) “The Quality Dimension. Evaluating Quality of Service and Quality of Life in Human Services’ British Journal of Social Work 22, 437–453.Google Scholar
Parton, N. (1985) The Politics of Child Abuse, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pecora, P.J., Whittaker, J.K. & Maluccio, A.N. (1992). The Child Welfare Challenge: Policy, Practice and Research, USA: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pinderhughes, E.B. (1989) Understanding Race, Ethnicity and Power, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pringle, K. (1992-1993) ‘Child Sexual Abuse perpetrated by welfare personnel and the problem of men’ Critical Social Policy, No.36, v.12(3), Winter, 4–19.Google Scholar
Reamer, F.G. (1993) ‘Liability Issues in Social Work Administration’ Administration in Social Work, 17(4), 11–23.Google Scholar
Reder, P., Duncan, S. & Gray, M. (1993) Beyond Blame: Child Abuse Tragedies Revisited, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rindfleisch, R. & Rabb, J. (1984) ‘Dilemmas in Planning for the Protection of Children and Youths in Residential Facilities’ Child Welfare, LXIII, (3), May-June.Google Scholar
Ryan, P. & McFadden, J. (1987) Analysing Abuse in Family Foster Care, USA: Institute for the Study of Children & Families, Eastern Michigan Univ.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. (1982) “The Responsibility of Residential Placements for Children's Rights to Development’ Child & Youth Services USA: Haworth Press, 23–45.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. (1990) ‘Institutional child abuse: the making and prevention of an un-problem’ Journal of Child and Youth Care, 4(6), 1–22.Google Scholar
Westcott, H.L. (1991) Institutional Abuse of Children - From Research to Policy: A Review, UK: NSPCC.Google Scholar
White, M. (1986) ‘Negative Explanation, Restraint and Double Description: A Template for Family Therapy’ Family Process, 25(2), June, 169–183.Google Scholar