Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T04:25:56.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physical punishment in child rearing: A background paper to the campaign for EPOCH (End Physical Punishment of Children) in Australia.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Extract

With attention focussed on child abuse and measures for child protection in many countries around the world, efforts have been made to understand something of the nature and dimensions that lie behind abuse. Now the time has come to look at domestic violence in its other manifestations - not only parent to child as in child abuse, but also husband to wife or cohabiter to cohabiter. What, however, has been missing from this widening of concerns has been a focus on parental behaviour toward their children which involves the use of physical punishment in child rearing but which may fall short of the legal definition of abuse. This gap is about to be considered with the emergence in Australia of the EPOCH campaign in which Oz Child is to be a leading participant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

Amato, P. (1987) Children in Australian Families - The Growth of Competence, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Prentice Hall, p. 42 Google Scholar
Angus, G., Wilkinson, K. & Zabar, P. (1994) Child Abuse and Neglect, Australia 1991–1992, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare p. 28 Google Scholar
Boss, P., Edwards, S. & Pitman, S. Profile of Young Australians - Facts, Figures and Issues, Melbourne: Churchill Livingstone, 1995 Google Scholar
Burns, N. (1993) Literature Review of the Issues Related to the Use of Corrective Force Against Children. Department of Justice (Canada) WD 6e, p. 13 Google Scholar
EPOCH Worldwide (1992) Radda Barnen, Booklet published by the Association for the Protection of all Children Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Greven, P. (1991) Spare the Child - the Religious Roots of Punishment and the Psychological Impact of Physical Abuse, New York: Alfred A Knopf, pp 22 & 83 Google Scholar
Haeuser, A. (1991) Reaffirming Physical Punishment in Child Rearing as one Root of Physical Abuse, 9th National Conference on Child Abuse and Neglect, Denver, Col. USAGoogle Scholar
Leach, P. (undated) Smacking - a Shortcut to Nowhere, London: EPOCH Google Scholar
McCormick, K.F. (1992) ‘Attitudes of Primary Care Physicians Toward Corporal Punishment’, Journal of the American Medical Association, 267 (23), pp 31613165 Google Scholar
NASW National Association of Social Workers (USA) (1990) Delegate Assembly, August, Policy statement.Google Scholar
Newell, P. (1989) Children Are People Too - The Case Against Physical Punishment, London: Bedford Square Press [Peter Newell has a work background in journalism and social issues advocacy. He has been coordinator of EPOCH (UK) since Its inception. The book cited above describes that organisation's work and rationale. The model bill proposed to change the law on physical punishment is in Appendix 3]Google Scholar
Newell, P (1994) Putting an End to Physical Punishment (transcript) paper given at a seminar, sponsored by Oz Child: Children Australia, held in Melbourne 9 September.Google Scholar
Newson, J. & Newson, E. (1989). The Extent of Physical Punishment in the U.K. Association for the Protection of all Children, Ltd.Google Scholar
Office of the Commissioner for Children, New Zealand (1993) Newsletter, no. 8.Google Scholar
R.v Terry (1954) VLR. 114Google Scholar
Stanley, J. & Goddard, C. (1993) ‘The Association Between Child Abuse and Other Family violence. Australian Social Work, 46 (2), pp 38.Google Scholar
Swedish Parents Don't Spank’, (1992) Mothering (Canada) 63, Spring, pp 4247 Google Scholar