Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T09:05:52.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Family Inclusive Child Protection Practice: The History of the Family Inclusion Network and Beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2014

Frank Ainsworth  and
John Berger
Frank Ainsworth*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work and Community Welfare, James Cook University, Townsville campus, Queensland 4811, Australia
John Berger
Affiliation:
Chief Executive Officer, St Bartholomew House, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Dr Frank Ainsworth, PhD, Senior Principal Research Fellow (Adjunct), School of Social Work and Community Welfare, James Cook University, Townsville campus, Queensland 4811. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article records briefly the history of the Family Inclusion Network as an organisation that promotes family inclusive child protection practice. Since its inception in Queensland in 2006, Family Inclusion Network organisations have been formed elsewhere and now exist in Western Australia, South Australia, Victoria, Tasmania, Australian Capital Territory and New South Wales. In 2010, developments at a national level saw the formation of the Family Inclusion Network Australia. Most organisations are incorporated and some have achieved charitable status. Each organisation endorses a common set of aims and objectives. There are, however, differences in terms of whether state or territory organisations accept government funding or not, are staffed by professionals or rely entirely on volunteer personnel, and have a capacity or otherwise to provide direct casework services to parents. Some state organisations focus on information and advice services, and legislative and policy reform efforts. All have telephone advice lines and a webpage presence. This article also focuses on a code of ethics for child protection practice and on the contribution parents can make to child protection services, and their rights to do so.

Keywords

family inclusivecode of ethicsparental rights
Type
Special Section: Moving beyond protection: Inclusiveness and families
Information
Children Australia , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 60 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clary, M., Klease, C., Thompson, J., Thorpe, R., & Walsh, K. (2007). Family inclusive child protection practice. Townsville: Family Inclusion Network October.Google Scholar
Connolly, M. (2010). Engaging family members in decision making in child welfare. In Arney, F. & Scott, D. (Eds.), Working with vulnerable families. A partnership approach (pp. 219–226). Sydney: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, H., & Walsh, T. (2009). Mothers and the child protection system. International Journal of Law, Policy the Family, 23 (2), 211–229.Google Scholar
Family Inclusion Network Australia (2010). Constitution. Sydney.Google Scholar
Family Inclusion Network-New South Wales (2009). A code of ethics for child protection practice. Retrieved from www.fin-nsw.org.au (accessed 10 February 2014).Google Scholar
Hansen, P., & Ainsworth, F. (2009). Human rights abuse in aspects of child protection practice. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 44 (2), 124–193.Google Scholar
Harries, M. (2008). The experience of parents and families of children and young people in care. Perth: Family Inclusion Network.Google Scholar
Hinton, T. (2013). Parents in the child protection system. Hobart: Anglicare Tasmania.Google Scholar
Holmes, K. (2009). Giving a voice to parents of children in out-of-home care. Unpublished honours thesis, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, NSW.Google Scholar
Ivec, M. (2013). A necessary engagement. A review of parent and family engagement in child protection. Hobart: Anglicare Tasmania.Google Scholar
Ivec, M., Braithwaite, V., & Harris, N. (2009). ‘Resetting the relationship’ in indigenous child protection: Public hope and private reality. Occasional paper 14. Canberra: Australian National University, Regulatory Institutions Network.Google Scholar
NSW Department of Community Services (2009). Annual report 2007/08. Code of conduct and ethics. Sydney: NSW Department of Community Services.Google Scholar
Tobis, D. (2013) From pariahs to partners. How parents and their allies changed New York City's child welfare system. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trotter, C. (2002). Worker skill and client outcomes in child protection. Child Abuse Review, 11 (1), 38–50.Google Scholar
United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html (accessed 31 January 2014).Google Scholar
United Nations (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/library/ethics/un-convention/ (accessed 31 January 2014).Google Scholar