Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:05:42.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Report of the Coding Committee of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Rodney C. G. Franklin ,
Robert H. Anderson ,
Otto Daniëls ,
Martin Elliott ,
Marc H. M. L. Gewillig ,
Renzo Ghisla ,
Otto N. Krogmann ,
Herbert E. Ulmer  and
Franco P. Stocker
Rodney C. G. Franklin*
Affiliation:
Coding Committee of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology
Robert H. Anderson
Affiliation:
Coding Committee of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology
Otto Daniëls
Affiliation:
Coding Committee of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology
Martin Elliott
Affiliation:
Coding Committee of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology
Marc H. M. L. Gewillig
Affiliation:
Coding Committee of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology
Renzo Ghisla
Affiliation:
Coding Committee of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology
Otto N. Krogmann
Affiliation:
Coding Committee of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology
Herbert E. Ulmer
Affiliation:
Coding Committee of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology
Franco P. Stocker
Affiliation:
Coding Committee of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology
*
Dr Rodney C. G. Franklin, Paediatric Cardiologist, Harefield Site, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, Harefield, Middlesex UB9 6JH, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For many years, paediatric cardiologists and paediatric cardiac surgeons have felt the need for a common diagnostic and therapeutic coding system with which to classify patients of all ages with congenital and acquired heart disease. This desire has been highlighted by the recent, and ongoing, enquiry into the outcome of paediatric cardiac surgery at the unit in Bristol, in the United Kingdom, and the resulting obligation to provide national and international comparisons of surgical results between centres caring for these patients. In order to incorporate effective clinical governance and best practice into our speciality, a method is required to gather accurate and validated data on the diagnosis, therapy and outcome of patients with heart disease from prenatal life through to adulthood. This would facilitate comparisons between individual units which fully take into account the mix of cases involved, and thus attempt to focus on the relevant and genuine factors underlying the differing outcomes in terms of both mortality and morbidity. For this to be achieved, it is essential to have a comprehensive system of coding and classification, using mutually exclusive and unambivalent terms. The system must be both easy to use, and fulfil the needs and expectations of widely different cultures of practice. Although many centres have developed their own system of internal audit, with their own coding system, and some co-operation has taken place between centres nationally and across international boundaries within Europe by the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Federation (see below), a cohesive, and comprehensive system suitable for setting standards has yet to emerge. Historically, this has partly been due to the lack of recognition by governments of the importance of such a process, with underfunding of initiatives aimed at addressing these issues, both technologically and in terms of human resources.

Type
The European Paediatric Cardiac Code
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 10 , Issue S1 , January 2000 , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Smith, R. All changed, changed utterly. Brit Med J 1998; 316: 1917–1918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mavroudis, C, Gevitz, M, Ring, WS, Mclntosh, CL, Schwartz, M. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Congenital Heart Surgery Database report: analysis of the first harvest (1994–1997), Ann ThoracSurg 1999: 68: 601–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, FP. AEPC Newsletter What is happening with the European Paediatric Cardiac Code? Cardiol Young 1999;9: 342–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, GAH, Anderson, RH, Rigby, ML. The diagnosis of congenital heart disease; incorporating the Brompton Hospital Diagnostic Code. Castle House, Tunbridge Wells 1985, pp.110–120.Google Scholar
Franklin, RCG, Anderson, RH, Daniëls, O et al. The European Paediatric Catdiac Code. Cardiol Young 1999; 9: 633–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van, Praagh R. The segmental approach to diagnosis in congenital heart disease. Birth Defects 1972; 8: 4–23.Google Scholar
Anderson, R, Macartney, FJ, Shinebourne, EA, Tynan, M. Terminology In: Anderson, R, Macartney, FJ, Shinebourne, EA, Tynan, M (Eds.): Paediatric Cardiology Volume 1. London: Churchill Livingstone 1987: Chap 3: 65–82.Google Scholar
Anderson, RH. How should we optimally describe complex congenitally malformed hearts? Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1996; 62: 710–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shinebourne, EA, Macartney, FJ, Anderson, RH, Sequential chamber localisation: the logical approach to diagnosis in congenital heart disease. Br Heart J 1976; 38: 327–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tynan, MJ, Becker, AE, Macartney, FJ, Quero-Jimenez, M, Shinebourne, EA, Anderson, RH. Nomenclature and classification of congenital heart disease. Br Heart J 1979; 41: 544–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, RCG. The European Paediatric Cardiac Code Long List – structure and function. Card Young 2000; 10 (Suppl. 1): 27–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, P. Eisenmenger syndrome, or pulmonary hypertension with reversed central shunt. Br Med J 1958; 2: 755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed