Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:22:19.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regional differnces in birth prevalence of congenital heart disease in Malta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Victor Grech*
Affiliation:
St Luke's Hospital, Guardamangia, Department of Health Information, Malta
Hugo Agius-Muscat
Affiliation:
St Luke's Hospital, Guardamangia, Department of Health Information, Malta
Charles Savona-Ventura
Affiliation:
St Luke's Hospital, Guardamangia, Department of Health Information, Malta
Joe Pace
Affiliation:
St Luke's Hospital, Guardamangia, Department of Health Information, Malta
*
Dr Victor Grech, Paediatric Department, St Luke's Hospital, Guardamangia, Malta. Tel: 241251 Ext. 1471; Fax: 240176; email: [email protected]

Abstract

Aim

Recent studies have shown a correlation between environmental pollutants and increased risk of selected congenital malformations. The South-East area of the Island of Malta is much more industrialised than the more rural North-West area. The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that there are no regional differences in Malta in the prevalence at birth of congenital cardiac malformations. Methods: Live born infants with congenital cardiac malformations born between 1990 and 1994 were allocated to 10 areas, and thence to 2 regions of 5 areas each, so as to constitute North-West and South-East Malta. Official publications gave population totals and growth rates. Those infants with congenital cardiac malformations were then compared between the different regions using χ2 and the Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

The overall prevalence of congenital heart disease at birth was 8.8/1000 live births. The birth prevalence for the South-East region (10.1/1000 LB – 95% CI 8.4–12.3/1000 live births) was significantly higher than for the North-West (7.4/1000 live births – 95% CI 6.0–9.0/1000 live births) – p=0.03, Odds ratio 1.38 (95% CI 1.05–2.61). The Mann-Whitney U test showed a significant difference in the distribution amongst the 10 defined areas (p=0.016). The Central-East area had the highest prevalence of cardiac malformations in the entire Island – p=0.02, Odds ratio 1.70 (95% CI 1.10–2.61). Demography showed an efflux of individuals from the South-East of Malta.

Conclusion

The higher prevalence of congenital heart disease noted at birth in South-East Malta is unlikely to be due to genetic factors, as these would have migrated North-West along with the population movement. An environmental factor, therefore, seems more likely to be responsible for the increased predisposition to congenital heart disease in the South-East of Malta.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Grech, V. Epidemiology and diagnosis of ventricular septal defect in Malta. Cardiol Young. 1998; 8, 3: 329336Google Scholar
2.Nora, JJ, Nora, AH. The evolution of specific genetic and environmental counselling in congenital heart diseases. Circulation 1978; 57: 205213.Google Scholar
3.Croen, LA, Shaw, GM, Sanbonmatsu, L, Selvin, S, Buffler, PA. Maternal residential proximity to hazardous waste sites and risk for selected congenital malformations. Epidemiology 1997; 8: 347354.Google Scholar
4.Grech, V. Spectrum of congenital heart disease in Malta: an excess of lesions causing right ventricular outflow tract obstruction in a population based study. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 521525.Google Scholar
5. Demographic review for the Maltese Islands. Malta: Central Office of Statistics (annual publications).Google Scholar
6. Cencus 85 Voume 1, A dernographic profile of Mala and Gozo Malta Central Office of statistics 1996.Google Scholar
7. Cencus of population and housing 1995. Preliminary report. Malta: Central Office of statistics 1996.Google Scholar
8.Fleiss, JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. NewYork: John Wiley and Sons, 1981: 1415.(2nd edition).Google Scholar
9.Grech, V, Parascandolo, R, Cuschieri, A. Tetralogy of Fallot in a patient with Killian-Pallister syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol —inpressGoogle Scholar
10.Samanek, M, Slavik, Z, Balatka, J, Bartakova, H, Goetzova, J, Homola, J, Rusava, I, Smrcka, J, Krejcir, M. Regional differences in the prevalence of congenital heart defects. Cesk Pediatr 1991; 46: 6570.Google Scholar
11.Jackson, M, Walsh, KP, Peart, I, Arnold, R. Epidemiology ofcongenital heart disease in Merseyside-1978–1988. Cardiol Young 1996; 6: 272280.Google Scholar
12.Nora, JJ. From generational studies to a multilevel geneticenvironmental interaction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 14681471.Google Scholar
13.Grech, V. Congenital heart disease in Malta. London: University of London, 1998, (PhD thesis).Google Scholar
14.Chetcuti, D, Buhagiar, A, Schembri, PJ, Ventura, F. Climate of the Maltese Islands: a review. Malta: University of Malta 1992: 53Google Scholar
15.Vella, AJ, Caruana, S, Demanuele, J. Atmospheric sulphur dioxide pollution in Malta: a preliminary study. Maltese Medical Journal 1993; 5: 3438Google Scholar
16.Dorsch, MM, Scragg, RK, McMichael, AJ, Baghurst, PA, Dyer, KF. Congenital malformations and maternal drinking water supply in rural South Australia: a case–control study. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 119: 473486.Google Scholar
17.Goldberg, SJ, Lebowitz, MD, Graver, EJ, Hicks, S. An association of human congenital cardiac malformations and drinking water contaminants. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 155164.Google Scholar