Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:07:45.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2015

Zebulon Z. Spector*
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children’s Hospital Heart Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
Stephen P. Seslar
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children’s Hospital Heart Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: S. P. Seslar, MD, PhD, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Seattle Children’s Hospital Heart Center, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, M/S RC.2.820, PO Box 5371, Seattle, WA 98105, United States of America. Tel: 206 987 1417; Fax: 206 987 3839; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background

Adults with high premature ventricular contraction burden can develop left ventricular dilation, dysfunction, and strain, consistent with a cardiomyopathy, which is reversible with radiofrequency ablation of the premature ventricular contractions. Evidence in children with similar ectopy burden is limited. We performed a single-centre retrospective review to examine the prevalence of premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy, natural history of ventricular ectopy, and progression to ventricular tachycardia in children with frequent premature ventricular contractions.

Methods

Children aged between 6 months and 18 years, with premature ventricular contractions comprising at least 20% of rhythm on 24-hour Holter monitor, were included in our study. Those with significant structural heart disease, ventricular tachycardia greater than 1% of rhythm at the time of premature ventricular contraction diagnosis, or family history of cardiomyopathy – except tachycardia-induced – were excluded. Cardiomyopathy was defined by echocardiographic assessment.

Results

A total of 36 children met the study criteria; seven patients (19.4%, 95% CI 6.2–32.6%) met the criteria for cardiomyopathy, mostly at initial presentation. Ectopy decreased to <10% of beats without intervention in 16.7% (95% CI 4.3–29.1%) of the patients. No patient progressed to having ventricular tachycardia as more than 1% of beats on follow-up Holter. Radiofrequency ablation was performed in three patients without cardiomyopathy.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates a higher prevalence of cardiomyopathy among children with high premature ventricular contraction burden than that previously shown. Ectopy tended to persist throughout follow-up. These trends suggest the need for a multi-centre study on frequent premature ventricular contractions in children. In the interim, regular follow-up with imaging to evaluate for cardiomyopathy is warranted.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Conti, CR. Ventricular arrhythmias: a general cardiologist’s assessment of therapies in 2005. Clin Cardiol 2005; 28: 314316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Gaita, F, Giustetto, C, Di Donna, P, et al. Long-term follow-up of right ventricular monomorphic extrasystoles. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 364370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Rosenbaum, MB. Classification of ventricular extrasystoles according to form. J Electrocardiol 1969; 2: 289297.Google ScholarPubMed
4. Bogun, F, Crawford, T, Reich, S, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of frequent, idiopathic premature ventricular complexes: comparison with a control group without intervention. Heart Rhythm 2007; 4: 863867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Hasdemir, C, Kartal, Y, Simsek, E, Yavuzgil, O, Aydin, M, Can, LH. Time course of recovery of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2013; 36: 612617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Topaloglu, S, Aras, D, Cagli, K, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic functions in patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions from right ventricular outflow tract. Heart Vessels 2007; 22: 328334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Wijnmaalen, AP, Delgado, V, Schalij, MJ, et al. Beneficial effects of catheter ablation on left ventricular and right ventricular function in patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions and preserved ejection fraction. Heart 2010; 96: 12751280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Duffee, DF, Shen, WK, Smith, HC. Suppression of frequent premature ventricular contractions and improvement of left ventricular function in patients with presumed idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Mayo Clin Proc 1998; 73: 430433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Zhong, L, Lee, Y, Huang, XM, et al. Relative efficacy of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs in treating premature ventricular contractions: a single center retrospective study. Heart Rhythm 2014; 11: 187193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Baman, TS, Lange, DC, Ilg, KJ, et al. Relationship between burden of premature ventricular complexes and left ventricular function. Heart Rhythm 2010; 7: 865869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Chugh, SS, Shen, W, Luria, DM. First evidence of premature ventricular complex-induced cardiomyopathy: a potentially reversible cause of heart failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2000; 11: 328329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Takemoto, M, Yoshimura, H, Ohba, Y, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of premature ventricular complexes from right ventricular outflow tract improves left ventricular dilation and clinical status in patients without structural heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 12591265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Yarlagadda, RK, Iwai, S, Stein, KM, et al. Reversal of cardiomyopathy in patients with repetitive monomorphic ventricular ectopy originating from the right ventricular outflow tract. Circulation 2005; 112: 10921097.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Yokokawa, M, Good, E, Crawford, T, et al. Recovery from left ventricular dysfunction after ablation of frequent premature ventricular complexes. Heart Rhythm 2013; 10: 172175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Huizar, JF, Kaszala, K, Potfay, J, et al. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction induced by ventricular ectopy: a novel model for premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011; 4: 543549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Beaufort-Krol, GC, Dijkstra, SS, Bink-Boelkens, MT. Natural history of ventricular premature contractions in children with structurally normal heart: does origin matter? Europace 2008; 10: 9981003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Patel, A, Ganley, J, Shah, M. Increased Ventricular Ectopy Burden in Pediatric Patients Does Not Cause Cardiomyopathy. Abstract. 32nd Annual Scientific Sessions of the Heart Rhythm Society, San Francisco, CA, May, 2011.Google Scholar
18. Sestito, A, Pardeo, M, Sgueglia, GA, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance of healthy children and young adults with frequent premature ventricular complexes. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2007; 8: 692698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Sun, Y, Blom, NA, Yu, Y, et al. The influence of premature ventricular contractions on left ventricular function in asymptomatic children without structural heart disease: an echocardiographic evaluation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2003; 19: 295299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Tsuji, A, Nagashima, M, Hasegawa, S, et al. Long-term follow-up of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias in otherwise normal children. Jpn Circ J 1995; 59: 654662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Evenson, KR, Welch, VL, Cascio, WE, Simpson, RJ Jr. Validation of a short rhythm strip compared to ambulatory ECG monitoring for ventricular ectopy. J Clinical Epidemiol 2000; 53: 491497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Drezner, JA, Ackerman, MJ, Cannon, BC, et al. Abnormal electrocardiographic findings in athletes: recognizing changes suggestive of primary electrical disease. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47: 153167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed