Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:58:48.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Echocardiographic right ventricular function correlations with cardiac catheterisation data in biventricular congenital heart patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2017

Holly Nadorlik
Affiliation:
Heart Center, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
Corey Stiver
Affiliation:
Heart Center, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
Sairah Khan
Affiliation:
Heart Center, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
Yongjie Miao
Affiliation:
Heart Center, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
Ralf Holzer
Affiliation:
Heart Center, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
John P. Cheatham
Affiliation:
Heart Center, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
Clifford L. Cua*
Affiliation:
Heart Center, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
*
Correspondence to: C. Cua, MD, Heart Center, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, 43205-2696 Ohio, United States of America. Tel: 614 722 2530; Fax: +614 722 2549; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background

Newer echocardiographic techniques may allow for more accurate assessment of right ventricular function. Adult studies have correlated these echocardiographic measurements with invasive data, but minimal data exist in the paediatric congenital heart population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate echocardiographic measurements that correlate best with right ventricular systolic and diastolic catheterisation parameters.

Methods

Patients with two-ventricle physiology who underwent simultaneous echocardiogram and cardiac catheterisation were included in this study. Right ventricular systolic echocardiographic data included fractional area change, displacement, tissue Doppler imaging s’ wave, global longitudinal strain, and strain rate s’ wave. Diastolic echocardiographic data included tricuspid E and A waves, tissue Doppler imaging e’ and a’ waves, and strain rate e’ and a’ waves. E/tissue Doppler imaging e’, tissue Doppler imaging e’/tissue Doppler imaging a’, E/strain rate e’, and strain rate e’/strain rate a’ ratios were also calculated. Catheterisation dP/dt was used as a marker for systolic function and right ventricular end-diastolic pressure for diastolic function.

Results

A total of 32 patients were included in this study. The median age at catheterisation was 3.1 years (0.3–17.6 years). The DP/dt was 493±327 mmHg/second, and the right ventricular end-diastolic pressure was 7.7±2.4 mmHg. There were no significant correlations between catheterisation dP/dt and systolic echocardiographic parameters. Right ventricular end-diastolic pressure correlated significantly with strain rate e’ (r=−0.4, p=0.02), strain rate a’ (r=−0.5, p=0.03), and E/tissue Doppler imaging e’ (r=0.4, p=0.04).

Conclusion

Catheterisation dP/dt did not correlate with echocardiographic measurements of right ventricular systolic function. Strain rate and tissue Doppler imaging analysis significantly correlated with right ventricular end-diastolic pressure. These values should be further studied to determine whether they may be used as an alternative method to estimate right ventricular end-diastolic pressure in this patient population.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Feltes, TF, Bacha, E, Beekman, RH, et al. Indications for cardiac catheterization and intervention in pediatric cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123: 26072652.Google Scholar
2. Lopez, L, Colan, SD, Frommelt, PC, et al. Recommendations for quantification methods during the performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report from the pediatric measurements writing group of the American Society of Echocardiography Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Council. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010; 23: 465495; quiz 576–577.Google Scholar
3. Dandel, M, Lehmkuhl, H, Knosalla, C, Suramelashvili, N, Hetzer, R. Strain and strain rate imaging by echocardiography – basic concepts and clinical applicability. Curr Cardiol Rev 2009; 5: 133148.Google Scholar
4. Mattioli, AV, Castelli, A, Mattioli, G. Relationship between mean right atrial pressure and Doppler parameters in patients with right ventricular infarction. Clin Cardiol 2000; 23: 771775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Hilde, JM, Skjorten, I, Grotta, OJ, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction and remodeling in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease without pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 11031111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Constantinescu, T, Magda, SL, Niculescu, R, et al. New echocardiographic tehniques in pulmonary arterial hypertension vs. right heart catheterization – a pilot study. Maedica 2013; 8: 116123.Google Scholar
7. Rajagopalan, N, Simon, MA, Shah, H, Mathier, MA, Lopez-Candales, A. Utility of right ventricular tissue Doppler imaging: correlation with right heart catheterization. Echocardiography 2008; 25: 706711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Naderi, N, Ojaghi Haghighi, Z, Amin, A, et al. Utility of right ventricular strain imaging in predicting pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Congest Heart Fail 2013; 19: 116122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Cevik, A, Kula, S, Olgunturk, R, et al. Doppler tissue imaging provides an estimate of pulmonary arterial pressure in children with pulmonary hypertension due to congenital intracardiac shunts. Congenit Heart Dis 2013; 8: 527534.Google Scholar
10. Husain, N, Gokhale, J, Nicholson, L, Cheatham, JP, Holzer, RJ, Cua, CL. Noninvasive estimation of ventricular filling pressures in patients with single right ventricles. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26: 13301336.Google Scholar
11. Husain, N, Gokhale, J, Nicholson, L, et al. Comparing echocardiographic assessment of systolic function with catheterization data in patients with single right ventricles. Acta Cardiologica 2014; 69: 281288.Google Scholar
12. Menon, SC, Gray, R, Tani, LY. Evaluation of ventricular filling pressures and ventricular function by Doppler echocardiography in patients with functional single ventricle: correlation with simultaneous cardiac catheterization. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24: 12201225.Google Scholar
13. Schlangen, J, Petko, C, Hansen, JH, et al. Two-dimensional global longitudinal strain rate is a preload independent index of systemic right ventricular contractility in hypoplastic left heart syndrome patients after Fontan operation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 880886.Google Scholar
14. Gokhale, J, Husain, N, Nicholson, L, Texter, KM, Zaidi, AN, Cua, CL. QRS duration and mechanical dyssynchrony correlations with right ventricular function after Fontan procedure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013; 26: 154159.Google Scholar
15. Yates, AR, Welty, SE, Gest, AL, Cua, CL. Myocardial tissue Doppler changes in patients with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Pediatr 2008; 152: 766770; 770.e1.Google Scholar
16. Quinones, MA, Gaasch, WH, Alexander, JK. Influence of acute changes in preload, afterload, contractile state, and heart rate on ejection and isovolumic indices of myocardial contractility in man. Circulation 1976; 53: 293302.Google Scholar
17. Little, WC. The left ventricular dP/dt max-end-diastolic volume relation in closed-chest dogs. Circ Res 1985; 56: 808815.Google Scholar
18. Ameloot, K, Palmers, PJ, Vande Bruaene, A, et al. Clinical value of echocardiographic Doppler-derived right ventricular dp/dt in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 15: 14111419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Imanishi, T, Nakatani, S, Yamada, S, et al. Validation of continuous wave Doppler-determined right ventricular peak positive and negative dP/dt: effect of right atrial pressure on measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 16381643.Google Scholar
20. Yabek, SM, Berman, W Jr, Dillon, T. Right ventricular contractile function in children with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 899901.Google Scholar
21. Tei, C, Nishimura, RA, Seward, JB, Tajik, AJ. Noninvasive Doppler-derived myocardial performance index: correlation with simultaneous measurements of cardiac catheterization measurements. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 169178.Google Scholar
22. Vogel, M, Schmidt, MR, Kristiansen, SB, et al. Validation of myocardial acceleration during isovolumic contraction as a novel noninvasive index of right ventricular contractility: comparison with ventricular pressure-volume relations in an animal model. Circulation 2002; 105: 16931699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Yamada, H, Oki, T, Tabata, T, Iuchi, A, Ito, S. Assessment of left ventricular systolic wall motion velocity with pulsed tissue Doppler imaging: comparison with peak dP/dt of the left ventricular pressure curve. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998; 11: 442449.Google Scholar
24. Kutty, S, Zhou, J, Gauvreau, K, Trincado, C, Powell, AJ, Geva, T. Regional dysfunction of the right ventricular outflow tract reduces the accuracy of Doppler tissue imaging assessment of global right ventricular systolic function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011; 24: 637643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Artis, NJ, Williams, G, Pepper, CB, Tan, LB. Two-dimensional strain imaging: a new echocardiographic advance with research and clinical applications. Int J Cardiol 2008: 240248.Google Scholar
26. Ho, CSS. A clinician’s guide to tissue Doppler imaging. Circulation 2006: 396398.Google Scholar
27. Ahn, J, Kim, D, Kim, T. Pulmonary arterial systolic pressure and E/e’ in the evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure: assessment of patients with atrial fibrillation. Herz 2015; 40(2): 298303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Gellen, B, Canoui-Poitrine, F, Lesault, PF, et al. Usefulness of tissue Doppler imaging for assessing left ventricular filling pressure in patients with stable severe systolic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2013; 112: 16191624.Google Scholar
29. Marchandise, S, Vanoverschelde, JL, D’Hondt, AM, et al. Usefulness of tissue Doppler imaging to evaluate pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 2014; 113: 20362044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Previtali, M, Chieffo, E, Ferrario, M, Klersy, C. Is mitral E/E’ ratio a reliable predictor of left ventricular diastolic pressures in patients without heart failure? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 13: 588595.Google Scholar
31. Watanabe, M, Ono, S, Tomomasa, T, et al. Measurement of tricuspid annular diastolic velocities by Doppler tissue imaging to assess right ventricular function in patients with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2003; 24: 463467.Google Scholar
32. Okumura, K, Slorach, C, Mroczek, D, et al. Right ventricular diastolic performance in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease: correlation of echocardiographic parameters with invasive reference standards by high-fidelity micromanometer catheter. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 491501.Google Scholar
33. Kasner, M, Gaub, R, Sinning, D, et al. Global strain rate imaging for the estimation of diastolic function in HFNEF compared with pressure-volume loop analysis. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11: 743751.Google Scholar
34. Meluzin, J, Spinarova, L, Hude, P, et al. Estimation of left ventricular filling pressures by speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011; 12: 1118.Google Scholar
35. Padeletti, M, Cameli, M, Lisi, M, et al. Right atrial speckle tracking analysis as a novel noninvasive method for pulmonary hemodynamics assessment in patients with chronic systolic heart failure. Echocardiography 2011; 28: 658664.Google Scholar