Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:31:06.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Judith Burnett. Generations: The Time Machine in Theory and Practice. Surrey, UK: Ashgate Press, 2010

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2011

Laura M. Funk*
Affiliation:
Centre on Aging, University of Victoria

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyerman, R., & Turner, B.S. (1998). Outline of a theory of generations. European Journal of Social Theory, 1, 91106.Google Scholar
Funk, L.M. (2010). The interpretive dynamics of filial and collective responsibility for aging parents. Canadian Review of Sociology, 47, 7192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, K. (1963). The problem of generations. Psychoanalytic Review, 57, 378404.Google Scholar
McDaniel, S.A. (2001). ‘Born at the right time’: Gendered generations and webs of entitlement and responsibility. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 26, 193214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, S.A. (2004). Generationing gender: Justice and the division of welfare. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilcher, J. (1994). Mannheim’s sociology of generations: an undervalued legacy. British Journal of Sociology, 45, 481495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozanova, J., Northcott, H.C., & McDaniel, S.A. (2006). Seniors and portrayals of intra-generational and inter-generational inequality in the Globe and Mail. Canadian Journal on Aging, 25, 373386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed