Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T23:17:56.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to the Comments of Knopff and Strayer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2009

Jennifer Smith
Jennifer Smith
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments/Commentaires
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 1983 , pp. 597 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association (l'Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Copies must have been available in British North America because Joseph Cauchon, who called Story “probably the greatest constitutional authority of the United States,” cited his work in the Confederation debates. See Parliamentary Debates on the Subject of the Confederation of the British North American Provinces (Quebec: Parliamentary Printers, 1865), 564.Google Scholar