Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:01:09.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homogeneity, Heterogeneity and Direct Democracy: The Case of Swiss Referenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2007

Abraham Diskin ,
André Eschet-Schwarz  and
Dan S. Felsenthal
Abraham Diskin
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
André Eschet-Schwarz
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
Dan S. Felsenthal
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. The general question addressed in this study is whether voting behaviour in referenda conducted in a pluralistic society tends to reflect more the heterogeneous or the homogeneous characteristics of this society. In order to answer this question we investigated, mainly by means of factor analysis, all 538 federal referenda conducted in Switzerland since the foundation of the Swiss Confederation in 1848 until the end of 2005. Based on the extensive Swiss experience, the answer to our question seems quite clearly to be that the use of referenda as tools of direct democracy in a pluralistic society tends to reflect much more the homogeneous characteristics of that society than its heterogeneous ones.

Résumé. Le thème général de l'étude est le suivant: le comportement des votants qui participent aux référendums dans une société pluraliste est-il influencé par les caractéristiques hétérogènes ou homogènes de la société en question? Afin de répondre à cette question nous avons examiné, par analyse factorielle, 538 referendums fédéraux tenus en Suisse depuis la création de la Confédération suisse en 1848 et jusqu'en 2005. Le résultat de notre recherche montre clairement que l'utilisation des référendums comme instrument de démocratie directe dans une société pluraliste a tendance à refléter davantage les caractéristiques homogènes que les caractéristiques hétérogènes de la société.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 317 - 342
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartolini, Stefano and Peter Mair. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bartolini, Stefano. 2000. The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bolliger, Christian and Regula Zürcher. 2004. “Deblockierung durch Kooptation? Eine Fallstudie zur Aufnahme der Katolisch-Konservativen in die Schweizerische Landesregierung 1891.” Swiss Political Science Review 10(4): 59–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David and Austin Ranney, eds. 1994. Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Church, Clive H. 2004. The Politics and Government of Switzerland. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Eschet-Schwarz, André. 1989. “The Role of Semi-Direct Democracy in Shaping Swiss Federalism: The Behavior of Cantons Regarding Revision of the Constitution.” Publius 19: 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenthal, Dan S. and Moshé Machover. 1998. The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Gerber, Elizabeth R. 1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Grisel, Etienne. 1997. Initiative et Référendum Populaires. 2nd ed. Berne: Staempfli.
Guinier, Lani. 1994. The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy. New York: Free Press.
Haskell, John. 2000. Direct Democracy or Representative Government? Dispelling the Populist Myth. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Jung, Sabine. 1996. “Lijpharts Demokrtatietypen und die Direkte Demokratie.” Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 6(3): 623–45.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S. and Ruud Koole. 2002. “Political Data in 2001.” European Journal of Political Research 41: 885–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Bruno and M. Dane Waters, eds. 2004. Direct Democracy in Europe: A Comprehensive Reference Guide to the Initiative and Referendum Process in Europe. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1995. Le Système Politique Suisse. Paris: Economica.
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duyvendak and Marco G. Giugni. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Boris Vernli, Pascal Sciarini and Matteo Gianni. 1996. Le Clivage Linguistique : Problèms de Compréhension entre les Communautés Linguistiques en Suisse. Berne, Office Fédéral de la Statistique.
LeDuc, Lawrence. 2003. The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Linder, Wolf. 1998. Swiss Democracy. 2nd ed. New York: St Martin's Press.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1981. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
McRae, Kenneth D. 1983. Conflict and Compromise in Multilingual Societies: Switzerland. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
McRae, Kenneth D. 1986. Conflict and Compromise in Multilingual Societies: Belgium. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
McRae, Kenneth D. 1997. “Contrasting Styles of Democratic Decision-Making: Adversarial versus Consensual Politics.” International Political Science Review 38(3): 279–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pipa. 2004. Electoral Engineering. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Papadopoulos, Yannis. 1998. Démocratie Directe. Paris: Economica.
Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2001. “How Does Direct Democracy Matter? The Impact of Referendum Votes on Politics and Policy-Making.” West European Politics 24(2): 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichard, Alain. 2004. La Question Jurassienne. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.
Qvortrup, Mads. 2002. A Comparative Study of Referendums: Government by the People. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Sciarini, Pascal. 1999. “La Formulation de la Décision.” In Handbuch der Schweizer Politik, ed. Ulrich Klöti, Peter Knoepfel, Hanspeter Kriesi, Wolf Linder and Yannis Papadopoulos. Zürich: Neue Züricher Zeitung Verlag.
Sciarini, Pascal and Alexandre H. Trechsel. 1996. “Démocratie Directe en Suisse: L'élite Politique Victime des Droits Populaires?” Swiss Political Science Review 2: 201–32.Google Scholar
Setälä, Maija. 1999. Referendums and Democratic Government. London: Macmillan.