Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:01:10.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hobbes's Modern Prometheus: A Political Philosophy for an Uncertain Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2007

Loralea Michaelis
Loralea Michaelis
Affiliation:
Mount Allison University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. This paper takes the Prometheus story in chapter 12 of Leviathan as the point of entry for an examination of the importance that Hobbes assigns to the problem of an uncertain future in his political philosophy. Hobbes's thinking on human nature represents a dramatic departure from the ancients not only because his mechanistic psychology reverses the ancient conception of the relation between reason and passion but also because his understanding of the temporal situation of human beings privileges the future to an unprecedented degree. It is against the backdrop of a universe in which the problem of an uncertain future has reached intolerable proportions that Hobbes develops his portrait of human nature; it is against the backdrop of this universe that he develops his account of Leviathan as the only earthly power capable of stabilizing the horizon of expectation.

Résumé. Cet article utilise l'histoire de Prométhée au chapitre 12 du Léviathan comme introduction à l'examen de l'importance qu'accorde Hobbes au problème de l'incertitude de l'avenir dans sa philosophie politique. La pensée de Hobbes sur la nature humaine constitue une dérogation spectaculaire par rapport aux Anciens non seulement parce que sa psychologie mécaniste s'oppose diamétralement à l'ancienne conception de la relation entre raison et passion, mais également parce que sa compréhension de la situation temporelle des êtres humains privilégie l'avenir et ce, à un degré sans précédent. C'est sur la toile de fond d'un univers dans lequel le problème de l'incertitude de l'avenir a atteint des proportions intolérables que Hobbes construit son portrait de la nature humaine comme un tourbillon de passions incontrôlées; c'est sur la toile de fond de cet univers qu'il élabore son récit du Léviathan, seule force terrestre capable de stabiliser les attentes de l'avenir.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 101 - 127
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aeschylus. 1956. “Prometheus Bound,” trans. David Grene. In Aeschylus II, eds. David Grene and Richmond Lattimore. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carmichael, D.J.C. 1983. “C. B. Macpherson's ‘Hobbes’: A Critique.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 16: 61–80.Google Scholar
Caton, Hiram. 1987. The Politics of Progress: The Origins and Development of the Commercial Republic, 1600–1835. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
Dodds, E.R. 1973. “The Ancient Concept of Progress.” In The Ancient Concept of Progress and other Essays on Greek Literature and Belief. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Eliade, Mircea. 1991. The Myth of Eternal Return, or Cosmos and History, trans. Willard R. Trask. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gert, Bernard. 1965. “Hobbes, Mechanism, and Egoism.” Philosophical Quarterly 15: 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 1967. “Hobbes and Psychological Egoism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 28: 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 1996. “Hobbes's Psychology.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Tom Sorell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldsmith, M.M. 1966. Hobbes's Science of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gunnell, John G. 1968. Political Philosophy and Time. Middletown, CN: Wesleyan University Press.
Hesiod. 1973. “Theogony.” In Hesiod and Theognis, trans. Dorothea Wender. London: Penguin.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1968. Leviathan, ed. C.B. Macpherson. London: Penguin Books.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1978a. On Man, trans. Charles T. Wood, T.S.K. Scott-Craig, and Bernard Gert. In Man and Citizen, ed. Bernard Gert. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1978b. The Citizen, trans. Thomas Hobbes. In Man and Citizen, ed. Bernard Gert. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
Jacobson, Norman. 1978. Pride and Solace: The Functions and Limits of Political Theory. New York: Methuen.
Jesseph, Douglas. 1996. “Hobbes and the Method of Natural Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes, ed. Tom Sorell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel. 1985. “A Renewed Attempt to Answer the Question: ‘Is the Human Race Continually Improving?’” In Kant's Political Writings, ed. Hans Reiss trans. H.B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kavka, Gregory S. 1986. Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1985. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, trans. Keith Tribe. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2002. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Kraynak, Robert P. 1990. History and Modernity in the Thought of Thomas Hobbes. Ithica and London: Cornell University Press.
Letwin, William. 1972. “The Economic Foundations of Hobbes' Politics.” In Hobbes and Rousseau: A Collection of Critical Essays, eds. Maurice Cranston and R.S. Peters. Garden City: Anchor Books.
Lund, William R. 1992. “The Use and Abuse of the Past: Hobbes on the Study of History.” Hobbes Studies 5: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1996. Discourses on Livy, trans. Harvey C. Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
MacPherson, C.B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacPherson, C.B. 1965. “Hobbes's Bourgeois Man.” In Hobbes Studies, ed. Keith Brown. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Oakeshott, Michael. 1991. “Introduction to Leviathan.” In Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Pocock, J.G.A. 1989. “Time, History, and Eschatology in the Thought of Thomas Hobbes.” In Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1987. “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality.” In The Basic Political Writings, trans. and ed. Donald Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Seneca. 1969. Letters from a Stoic, trans. Robin Campbell. London: Penguin Books.
Shelley, Mary. 1969. Frankenstein, or, The Modern Prometheus. London: Oxford University Press.
Shulman, George. 1988. “II. Hobbes, Puritans, and Promethean Politics.” Political Theory 16: 426–443.Google Scholar
Sorell, Thomas. 1988. “The Science in Hobbes's Politics.” In Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes, ed. G.A.J. Rogers and Alan Ryan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spragens, Thomas A. 1973. The Politics of Motion: The World of Thomas Hobbes. London: Croom Helm.
Strauss, Leo. 1952. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and its Genesis, trans. Elsa M. Sinclair. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thomas, Keith. 1965. “The Social Origins of Hobbes' Political Thought.” In Hobbes Studies, ed. Keith Brown. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Watkins, J.W.N. 1965. Hobbes's System of Ideas. London: Huchison & Co.