Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:28:47.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heidegger's Essentialist Responses to the Challenge of Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2007

David Edward Tabachnick
David Edward Tabachnick
Affiliation:
Nipissing University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. This paper is an effort to defend Heidegger's essentialist philosophy of technology against the charge of determinism. Rather than merely accepting its all-encompassing power, Heidegger provides three responses to the challenge of technology: 1) “aggressive essentialism” or the elimination of technology; 2) “moderate essentialism” or the reform of political, social and cultural institutions to better reflect the changes that technology brings; and 3) “passive essentialism” or the acceptance that we cannot act against or direct technology.

Résumé. Dans cet article, l'auteur s'efforce de défendre la philosophie d'essentialisme de technologie proposée par Heidegger contre l'accusation de déterminisme. Plutôt que simplement accepter le pouvoir omniprésent de la technologie, Heidegger fournit trois réponses au défi qu'elle présente: 1) “ l'essentialisme agressif ”, ou l'élimination de la technologie; 2) “ l'essentialisme modéré ”, ou la réforme des institutions politiques, sociales et culturelles pour mieux refléter les changements apportés par la technologie; et 3) “l'essentialisme passif ”, ou l'acceptation du fait que nous ne pouvons ni agir contre la technologie ni la diriger.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 487 - 505
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbey, Edward. 1975. The Monkey Wrench Gang. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Aquinas, St. Thomas. 1965. On Being and Essence. Trans. Joseph Bobik. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Aristotle. 1979. Aristotle's Metaphysics. Ed. David Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borgmann, Albert. 1984. Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bunge, Mario. 1979. “The five buds of Technophilosophy.” Technology in Society 1(1): 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, Paul. 1993. “Romanticism and Technology.” In Technology in the Western Political Tradition. Ed. Arthur Melzer, Jerry Weinberger and M. Richard Zinman. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
De Beistegui, Miguel. 1997. Heidegger and the Political. London: Routledge.
Dreyfus, Hubert and Charles Spinosa. 1997. “Highway bridges and feasts: Heidegger and Borgmann on how to affirm technology.” Man and World 30: 159–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellul, Jacques. 1967. The Technological Society. New York: Vintage.
Ellul, Jacques. 1980. The Technological System. New York: Continuum Publishing.
Farrenkopf, John. 1993. “Spengler's Historical Pessimsm and the Tragedy of Our Age.” Theory and Society 22(3): 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farwell, Paul. 1989. “Can Heidegger's Craftsman be Authentic?” International Philosophical Quarterly XXIX, 1, 113: 77–90.Google Scholar
Feenberg, Andrew. 1999. Questioning Technology. London: Routledge.
Feenberg, Andrew. 2000a. “Constructivism and Technology Critique: Replies to Critics.” Inquiry 43(2): 225–38.Google Scholar
Feenberg, Andrew. 2000b. “From Essentialism to Constructivism: Philosophy of Technology at the Crossroads.” In Technology and the Good Life? Ed. Eric Higgs, Andrew Light, and David Strong. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Feenberg, Andrew. 2002. Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.
Feenberg, Andrew. 2005. Heidegger and Marcuse: The Catastrophe and Redemption of History. New York: Routledge.
Fox, Nicols. 2002. Against the Machine: The Hidden Luddite Tradition in Literature, Art, and Individual Lives. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Gilbert-Walsh, James. 2003. “Heidegger's Communal Self-Assertion.” Telos 126: 53–65.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Michael. 2000. “Martin Heidegger's Aristotelian National Socialism.” Political Theory 28(2): 140–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazebrook, Trish. 2000. “From Physis to Nature, Technê to Technology: Heidegger on Aristotle, Galileo and Newton.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 38(1): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendinning, Chellis. 1990. “Notes toward a Neo-Luddite Manifesto.” Utne Reader 38(1): 50–53.Google Scholar
Grant, George. 1969. Technology and Empire. Toronto: Anansi.
Heidegger, Martin. 1959. An Introduction to Metaphysics. Trans. Ralph Manheim. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 1966. Discourse on Thinking. Trans. John M. Anderson and E. Hans Freund. New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, Martin. 1970. Martin Heidegger in Conversation. Ed. Richard Wisser. New Delhi: Arnold-Heinemann.
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. William Levin. New York: Harper and Row.
Heidegger, Martin. 1993a. Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings. Ed. David Farrell Krell. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.
Heidegger, Martin. 1993b. The Heidegger Controversy: A Critical Reader. Ed. Richard Wolin. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 2000. Introduction to Metaphysics. Trans. Richard Polt and Gregory Fried. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mander, Jerry. 1978. Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television. New York: William Morrow and Co.
McLuhan, Marshall. 1992. The Gutenberg Galaxy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
McLuhan, Marshall. 1995. “Playboy Interview.” In Essential McLuhan, Ed. Eric McLuhan and Frank Zingrone. Concord: Anansi.
Mitcham, Carl. 1994. Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mumford, Lewis. 1974. Pentagon of Power: The Myth of the Machine. Vol. II. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Janovich.
Olafson, Frederick A. 1993. “The Unity of Heidegger's Thought.” In The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, Ed. Charles Guignon. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Olafson, Frederick A. 2000. “Heidegger's Thought and Nazism.” Inquiry 43(3): 271–78.Google Scholar
Rockmore, Tom. 1997. On Heidegger's Nazism and Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California.
Roszak, Theodore. 1994. The Cult of Information: A Neo-Luddite Treatise on High-Tech, Artificial Intelligence, and the True Art of Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sale, Kirkpatrick. 1995a. “Lessons from the Luddites: Setting Limits on Technology.” The Nation 260(22): 785–88.Google Scholar
Sale, Kirkpatrick. 1995b. Rebels against the Future: The Luddites and Their War on the Industrial Revolution—Lessons for the Computer Age. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1988. “Existentialism is a Humanism.” In Existentialism: From Dostoyevsky to Sartre, Ed. Walter Kaufman. New York: Plume.
Schumacher, E.F. 1989. Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered. New York: Harper Perennial.
Spengler, Oswald. 1971. Der Mensch und die Technik: Beitrag zu einer Philosophic des Lebens [1931]. Munich: C.H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Tabachnick, David. 2004. “Techne, Technology and Tragedy.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 7(3): 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Iain. 2005. Heidegger on Ontotheology. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
Thomson, Iain. 2000. “What's Wrong with Being a Technological Essentialist? A Response to Feenberg.” Inquiry 43: 429–44.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1997. “Social Science and the Quest for a Just Society.” American Journal of Sociology 102(5): 1241–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Michael. 1990. Heidegger's Confrontation with Modernity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Zuckert, Catherine. 1990. “Heidegger's Philosophy and Politics.” Political Theory 18(1): 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar