Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:26:45.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking Identity and Coalitional Politics, Insights from Simone de Beauvoir

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2007

Elaine Stavro
Elaine Stavro
Affiliation:
Trent University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Identity politics have been much maligned by the Left as politically divisive and philosophically untenable. But the need for identification in the process of countering demeaned identities and fostering counter-hegemonic projects has been underestimated by poststructuralist critics. Good at dismantling identities and deconstructing existing strategies of inclusion, the poststructuralists are not particularly helpful in thinking through forms of subjectivity and/or collective action that would contribute to coalition building. Beauvoir provides a worthy model for coalitional politics. Her theory of relational subjectivity avoids essentialism and fosters collaboration, if that work is premised upon connected existences, rather than identity. Her theory of alterity, or Othering, acknowledges power differentials and accommodates both cultural and economic forces of oppression, moving away from static, centralized and binary relations of power that have become associated with second-wave feminism and conventional Marxism.

Résumé. La politique identitaire a été largement décriée par la gauche qui l'accuse de créer des dissensions et d'être philosophiquement insoutenable. Pourtant, le besoin d'identification dans le processus de soutien des identités dévaluées et de promotion de projets anti-hégémoniques a été sous-estimé par la critique post-structuraliste. Doués pour la déconstruction des identités et le démantèlement des stratégies d'inclusion, les post-structuralistes ont moins de talent pour concevoir des formes de subjectivité ou d'action collective qui contribueraient à la construction de coalitions. Simone de Beauvoir fournit un modèle précieux de politique de coalition. Sa théorie de la subjectivité relationnelle évite l'essentialisme et encourage la collaboration, si cet effort est basé sur des existences liées les unes aux autres plutôt que sur l'identité. Sa théorie de l'altérité reconnaît les différentiels de pouvoir et tient compte des forces oppressives, à la fois culturelles et économiques, abandonnant ainsi les rapports de pouvoir statiques, centralisés et binaires qui ont été associés avec le féminisme “ deuxième vague ” et le marxisme conventionnel.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 439 - 463
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda. 1988. “Cultural Feminism versus Post-Structuralism: the Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory.” Signs 13(3): 405–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Nancy. 2001. Simone de Beauvoir, Philosophy and Feminism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Beauvoir, Simone de and Gisele Halimi. 1962 Djamila Boupacha, trans. by G Peter. New York: Paragon House.
Beauvoir, Simone de. [1960] 1962. Prime of Life, trans. Peter Green. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing Company.
Beauvoir, Simone de. [1947] 1967. Ethics of Ambiguity, trans. Bernard Fretchman. New York: Citadel Press.
Beauvoir, Simone de. [1949] 1974. The Second Sex, trans. and ed. H.M. Parshley. New York: Vintage.
Bell, Vikki. 2000. Feminist Imagination. London: Sage.
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
Fanon, Frantz [1952] 1967. Black Skin, White Masks, trans. Charles Lam Markham. New York: Grove Press.
Fraser, Nancy. 2000. “Rethinking Recognition.” New Left Review 3: 107–20.Google Scholar
Gitlin, Todd. 1995. The Twilight of Common Dreams: Why America is Wracked by Culture Wars. New York: Henry Holt.
Heinamaa, Sara. 2003. Toward a Phenomenology of Sexual Difference: Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, Beauvoir. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Heyward, Leslie and Jennifer Drake, eds. 1997. Third Wave Agenda: Being Feminist, Doing Feminism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
hooks, bell. 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Centre. Boston: South End Press.
Irigaray, Luce. A Journal of Composition Theory. http://www.cas.usf.edu/JAC/163/Irigaray.html.
Kruks, Sonia. 2001. Retrieving Experience: subjectivity and recognition in feminist politics. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Kruks, Sonia. 2004. “Simone de Beauvoir and the Politics of Privilege.” Paper delivered at the American Political Science Association meetings in Chicago, 1–5 September.
Laclau, Ernesto. 1994. “Introduction.” The Making of Political Identities. New York: Verso.
Mitchell, Allyson and Lara Karaian. 2005. “Third wave Feminisms.” In Feminist issues: Race, Class and Sexuality, third ed., ed. Nancy Mandell. Toronto: Prentice Hall.
Mouffe, Chantal. 1992. “Feminism, Citizenship and Radical Democratic Politics.” Feminists Theorize the Political, eds. Judith Butler and Joan Scott. London: Routledge, 371.
Sartre, Jean Paul. [1946] 1976. Anti-Semite and Jew. Trans. George Becker. New York: Schocken Books.
Scott, Joan W. 1992. “Experience.” In Feminists Theorize the Political, eds. Judith Butler and Joan Scott. London: Routledge, 22–40.
Tapper, Marion. 1993. “Ressentiment and power: Reflections on feminist practice.” In Nietzsche, Feminism and Political Theory, ed. Paul Patton. London: Routledge.