Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:10:44.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Do Democracies Have Separation of Religion and State?”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2007

Jonathan Fox
Jonathan Fox
Affiliation:
Bar Ilan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. While many argue that separation of religion and state (SRAS) is an essential element of democracy, others posit that religion is an essential element of democracy's moral underpinnings. This study examines the debate using data from the Religion and State (RAS) dataset, which includes 62 variables in six broader categories measuring different aspects of SRAS for all 152 states with populations of one million or more, as well as data on democracy from the Polity and Freedom House datasets. It also develops seven operational definitions of SRAS that can be constructed using this data. Overall, the results show that a clear majority of democracies do not have SRAS even when evaluating multiple operational definitions of both democracy and SRAS. However, democracies tend to have lower average levels of government involvement in religion (GIR) than do non-democracies. This is because, while most democracies do not have SRAS, there is an upper limit to the amount of GIR that is found in any democracy that does not appear to apply to non-democracies. All this indicates that the proper question regarding religion and democracy is not one of SRAS but rather one of how much and what types of GIR can democracies tolerate.

Résumé. Alors que de nombreuses personnes prétendent que la séparation de la religion et de l'État est un élément essentiel de la démocratie, d'autres avancent que la religion est un élément essentiel des fondations morales de la démocratie. Cette étude analyse ce débat en utilisant des données provenant de la base de données Religion and State, qui comprend 62 variables regroupées en 6 grandes catégories et mesurant les différents aspects de la séparation de la religion et de l'État dans les 152 pays dont la population atteint un million d'habitants ou plus, ainsi que les données sur la démocratie fournies par la base de données Polity et l'indicateur de Freedom House. L'article met aussi au point sept définitions fonctionnelles de la séparation de la religion et de l'État, que l'on peut composer à partir de ces données. Dans l'ensemble, les résultats montrent que la grande majorité des démocraties ne pratiquent pas la séparation de la religion et de l'État, même lorsque l'on prend en compte plusieurs définitions fonctionnelles de la démocratie et de la séparation de la religion et de l'État. En revanche, le niveau moyen d'engagement religieux du gouvernement tend à être plus bas dans les démocraties que dans les pays qui ne sont pas des démocraties. Cela s'explique par le fait que, bien que la plupart des démocraties ne pratiquent pas la séparation de la religion et de l'État, elles observent un plafond d'engagement religieux qu'on ne retrouve pas dans les pays qui ne sont pas des démocraties. Tout ceci indique que la question la plus appropriée concernant la religion et la démocratie n'est pas celle de la séparation de la religion et de l'État, mais plutôt celle du degré et des modèles d'engagement religieux que les démocraties peuvent tolérer de la part de leurs gouvernements.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 1 - 25
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleby, R. Scott. 2000. The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bader, Veit. 1999. “Religious Pluralism: Secularism or Priority for Democracy.” Political Theory 27(5): 597–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, D.B., G.T. Kurian and T.M. Johnson. 2001. World Christian Encyclopedia, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barro, Robert J. and Rachel M. McCleary. 2003. “Religion and Economic Growth Across Countries.” American Sociological Review 68(5): 760–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 2002. God Is Dead: Secularization in the West. Blackwell.
Casanova, Jose. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chaves, Mark and David E. Cann. 1992. “Religion, Pluralism and Religious Market Structure.” Rationality and Society 4(3): 272–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalacoura, Katarina. 2000. “Unexceptional Politics? The Impact of Islam on International Relations.” Millennium 29(3): 879–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demerath, N.J._III. 2001. Crossing the Gods: World Religions and Worldly Politics. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Durham, W. Cole, Jr. 1996. “Perspectives on Religious Liberty: A Comparative Framework.” In Religious Human Rights in Global Perspective: Legal Perspectives, eds. John D. van der Vyver and John Witte, Jr. Boston: Martinus Njhoff.
Esposito, John L. and James P. Piscatori. 1991. “Democratization and Islam.” Middle East Journal 45(3): 427–40.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. and David D. Laitin. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97(1): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisch, M. Steven. 2002. “Islam and Authoritarianism.” World Politics 55(1): 4–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2002. Ethnoreligious Conflict in the Late 20th Century: A General Theory. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Fox, Jonathan. 2004. Religion, Civilization and Civil War: 1945 Through the New Millennium. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Fox, Jonathan. 2006. “World Separation of Religion and State into the 21st Century.” Comparative Political Studies 39(5): 537–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan and Shmuel Sandler. 2005. “Separation of Religion and State in the 21st Century: Comparing the Middle East and Western Democracies.” Comparative Politics 37(3): 317–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fradkin, Hillel. 2000. “Does Democracy Need Religion?” Journal of Democracy 11(1): 87–94.Google Scholar
Fuller, Graham E. 2002. “The Future of Political Islam.” Foreign Affairs 81(2): 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. 1988. Religious Convictions and Political Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hefner, Robert H. 2001. “Public Islam and the Problem of Democratization.” Sociology of Religion 62(4): 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Errol A. 1997. “Culture or Contiguity: Ethnic Conflict, the Similarity of States, and the Onset of War,1820–1989.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(5)(October): 649–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hurd, Elizabeth S. 2004. “The Political Authority of Secularism in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 10(2): 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggers, Keith and Ted R. Gurr. 1995. “Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data.” Journal of Peace Research 32(4): 469–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juergensmeyer, Mark. 1993. The New Cold War? Berkeley: University of California.
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2000. “Commitment Problems in Emerging Democracies: The Case of Religious Parties.” Comparative Politics 22(4): 379–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1998. “Democracy and Religious Politics: Evidence from Belgium.” Comparative Political Studies 31(3): 292–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Bernard. 1993. Islam and the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Linz, Juan J. 1978. Crisis, Breakdown, and Reequilibriation. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
Madeley, John TS. 2003a. “European Liberal Democracy and the Principle of State Religious Neutrality.” West European Politics 26(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Madeley, John TS. 2003b. “A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Church-State Relations in Europe.” West European Politics 26(1): 23–50.Google Scholar
Mazie, Steven V. 2004. “Rethinking Religious Establishment and Liberal Democracy: Lessons From Israel.” Brandywine Review of Faith and International Affairs 2(2): 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midlarsky, Manus I. 1998. “Democracy and Islam: Implications for Civilizational Conflict and the Democratic Peace.” International Studies Quarterly 42(3): 458–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John S. 1951. “Considerations on Representative Government.” In Utilitarianism, Liberty, and Representative Government, ed. John S. Mill. New York: E.P. Dutton.
Minkenberg, Michael. 2002. “Religion and Public Policy: Institutional, Cultural, and Political Impact on the Shaping of Abortion Policies in Western Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 35(2): 221–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsma, S. and C. Soper. 1997. The Challenge of Pluralism; Church and State in Five Democracies. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Norris, Pippa and Ronald Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Price, Daniel E. 1999. Islamic Political Culture, Democracy, and Human Rights. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Reynal-Querol, Marta. 2002. “Ethnicity, Political Systems, and Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(1): 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, Philip G. 2003. “Clash of Civilizations and Escalation of Domestic Ethnopolitical Conflicts.” Comparative Political Studies 36(5): 509–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rummel, Rudolph J. 1997. “Is Collective Violence Correlated with Social Pluralism?” Journal of Peace Research 34(2): 163–75.Google Scholar
Shah, Timothy S. 2000. “Making the Christian World Safe for Liberalism: From Grotius to Rawls.” The Political Quarterly 71: 121–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 2000. “The Sacred Dimension of Nationalism.” Millennium 29(3): 791–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Rodney and Laurence R. Iannaccone. 1994. “A Supply-Side Reinterpretation of the ‘Secularization’ of Europe.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 33: 230–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 2000. “Religion, Democracy, and the ‘Twin Tolerations.’” Journal of Democracy 11(4): 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Bryan R. 1982. Religion in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.