Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Piccinini, Gualtiero
and
Scott, Sam
2010.
Recovering What Is Said With Empty Names.
Canadian Journal of Philosophy,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 2,
p.
239.
MOUSAVIAN, SEYED N.
2010.
NEO-MEINONGIAN NEO-RUSSELLIANS.
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly,
Vol. 91,
Issue. 2,
p.
229.
Piccinini, Gualtiero
and
Scott, Sam N.
2010.
Recovering What is Said with Empty Names.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Mousavian, Seyed N.
2011.
Gappy Propositions?.
Canadian Journal of Philosophy,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 1,
p.
125.
Mousavian, Seyed N.
2014.
Empty Names and Pragmatic Millianism.
Thought: A Journal of Philosophy,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
49.
Mousavian, Seyed N.
2015.
Pragmatics of No Reference.
Mind & Language,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 1,
p.
95.
Hodgson, Thomas
2018.
Russellians can have a no proposition view of empty names.
Inquiry,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 7,
p.
670.
Hodgson, Thomas
2020.
Russellians can solve the problem of empty names with nonsingular propositions.
Synthese,
Vol. 197,
Issue. 12,
p.
5411.
Puczyłowski, Tomasz
2021.
Fictional names, their use and pragmatic interpretations.
Semiotica,
Vol. 2021,
Issue. 240,
p.
165.
Mousavian, Seyed N.
2021.
Plenitudinous Russellianism, ‘That’-Clauses, and the Principle of Substitutivity.
Dialogue,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 1,
p.
121.
POLAT, Mustafa
2023.
Millianism, Empty Names and The No-Proposition View.
Temaşa Erciyes Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü Dergisi,
p.
136.
Kosterec, Miloš
2023.
A Hyperintensional Theory of (Empty) Names.
Erkenntnis,
Vol. 88,
Issue. 2,
p.
511.
Puczyłowski, Tomasz
2024.
Why a Gricean-style defense of the vacuous truth of counterpossibles won’t work, but a defense based on heuristics just might.
Synthese,
Vol. 203,
Issue. 1,
Puczyłowski, Tomasz
2024.
How Broad Modal Fictionalism Can Survive Rosen’s Challenge.
Analiza i Egzystencja,
Vol. 65,
Issue. ,
p.
5.