Article contents
Continuing on
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
Abstract
What goes wrong, from a rational point of view, when an agent’s beliefs change while her evidence remains constant? I canvass a number of answers to this question suggested by recent literature, then identify some desiderata I would like any potential answer to meet. Finally, I suggest that the rational problem results from the undermining of reasoning processes (and possibly other epistemic processes) that are necessarily extended in time.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 45 , Issue 5-6: Special Issue: Belief, Action, and Rationality over Time , December 2015 , pp. 670 - 691
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2015
References
- 7
- Cited by