No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2020
1 Geach, Peter T. Reference and Generality (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 1968)Google Scholar
2 I take this sketch from: Gottlieb, Dale ‘No Entity Without Identity,’ in Shahan, R.W. and Swoyer, C. eds., Essays on the Philosophy of W. V. Quine (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press 1979) 79–96.Google Scholar
3 This story from Sydney Shoemaker is discussed by Perry, John in ‘Can the Self Divide?', Journal of Philosophy, 69 (1972) 463-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Perry, 468
5 Which is discussed as such by Brody on pp. 105-6.
6 Frege, Gottlob ‘On Sense and Reference,’ in Geach, P.T. and Black, M. Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1970) 56Google Scholar
7 Davidson, Donald ‘The Individuation of Events.’ in Rescher, N. ed., Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel (Dordrecht: Reidel 1969)Google Scholar
8 Coburn, Robert C. ‘Identity and Spatiotemporal Continuity,’ in Munitz, M. ed., Identity and Individuation (New York: New York University Press 1971) 51–102Google Scholar
9 See the preface to Kripke, Saul Naming and Necessity (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1980).Google Scholar
10 He takes such empirical evidence to be evidence against the adequacy of the I of I (p. 145).
11 Kaplan, David ‘Quantifying In,’ in Davidson, D. and Hintikka, J. eds., Words and Objections (Dordrecht: Reidel 1969) 206-42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 I discuss Brody's arguments further in ‘Is Transmutation Possible?', forthcoming in Philosophical Studies.
13 Wiggins, David Sameness and Substance (Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1980)Google Scholar