We have updated the migraine prevention guideline of the Canadian Headache Society from 2012, as there are new therapies available, and additionally, we have provided guidelines for the prevention of chronic migraine, which was not addressed in the previous iteration.

We undertook a systematic review to identify new studies since the last guideline. For studies identified, we performed data extraction and subsequent meta-analyses where possible. We composed a summary of the evidence found and undertook a modified Delphi recommendation process. We provide recommendations for treatments identified and additionally expert guidance on the use of the treatments available in important clinical situations.

We identified 61 studies that were included in this evidence update and identified 16 therapies we focused on. The anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) agents were approved by Health Canada between 2018 and 2024 and provide additional options for episodic and chronic migraine prevention. We also summarize evidence for the use of propranolol, topiramate and onabotulinumtoxinA in addition to anti-CGRP agents as treatments for chronic migraine. We have downgraded topiramate to a weak recommendation for use and gabapentin to a weak recommendation against its use in episodic migraine. We have weakly recommended the use of memantine, levetiracetam, enalapril and melatonin in episodic migraine.

Based on the evidence synthesis, we provide updated recommendations for the prevention of episodic and chronic migraine utilizing treatments available in Canada. We additionally provided expert guidance on their use in clinical situations.

Understanding sex differences among persons with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is critical to addressing the unique needs of both males and females from acute care through to rehabilitation. Epidemiological studies suggest that 7 of every 10 persons with moderate-to-severe TBI are male, with females representing about 30%–33%.

To examine the proportion of female and male individuals included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for moderate-to-severe TBI.

A systematic review was conducted in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines up to and including December 2022 using MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) human participants with a mean age ≥18 years, (2) ≥50% of the sample had moderate-to-severe TBI and (3) the study design was a RCT. Data extracted included author, year, country, sample size, number of female/male participants and time post-injury.

595 RCTs met the criteria for inclusion, published between 1978 and 2022, totaling 86,662 participants. The average proportion of female participants was 23.14%, and the percentage increased a small but significant amount over time. There was a significantly lower percentage of female participants in RCTs initiated in the acute phase (≤ 1 month) when compared with RCTs conducted in the chronic phase (≥ 6 months) post-injury (p < 0.001).

Female participants are underrepresented in RCTs of moderate-to-severe TBI. Addressing this underrepresentation is critical to establish effective treatments for all persons with TBI.

Many Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) graduates in neurosurgery face significant challenges in finding full-time employment. The current study describes the career outcomes of neurosurgery residents from Canadian programs.

All RCPSC neurosurgery graduates (n = 106) who completed their residency between 2015 and 2020 were included in this study. Baseline characteristics were determined for the entire cohort and then stratified by employment status. Several logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of full-time employment after residency.

Overall, 26.4% of neurosurgery graduates from 2015 to 2020 have been underemployed, defined as locum and clinical associate positions (6.6%), the pursuit of multiple fellowships (16%) and career change/nonsurgical career (3.8%). Only 52.0% of graduates were fully employed in Canada, with 30.2% appointed at academic institutions. Skull-base/open vascular (OR: 0.055, 95%CI [<0.01, 0.74]) and general neurosurgery (OR: 0.027, 95% CI [<0.01, 0.61]) fellowships were associated with underemployment. Advanced research degrees (master’s or Ph.D.) and sex were not associated with full-time employment.

Over one-quarter of recent Canadian neurosurgery graduates were underemployed, and nearly half do not find employment in Canada. These results reflect a concerning reality for current and prospective neurosurgery graduates in Canada and will hopefully serve as a call to action for the Canadian neurosurgery community.

Self-guided Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) for migraine interventions could improve access to care, but there is poor evidence of their efficacy.

A three-arm randomized controlled trial compared: iCBT focused on psychoeducation, self-monitoring and skills training (SPHERE), iCBT focused on identifying and managing personal headache triggers (PRISM) and a waitlist control. The primary treatment outcome was a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly headache days at 4 months post-randomization.

428 participants were randomized (mean age = 30.1). 240 participants (56.2%) provided outcome data at 4 months. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis with missing data imputed demonstrated that the proportion of responders with a ≥ 50% reduction was similar between combined iCBTs and waitlist (48.5/285, 17% vs. 16.6/143, 11.6%, p = 0.20), but analysis of completers showed both iCBT programs to be superior to the waitlist (24/108, 22.2% vs. 13/113, 11.5%, p = 0.047). ITT analysis with missing data imputed showed no difference between the two iCBTs (SPHERE: 24.8/143, 17.3% vs. PRISM: 23.7/142, 16.7%, p = 0.99). Uptake rates of the iCBTs were high (76.9% and 81.69% logged in at least once into SPHERE and PRISM, respectively), but adherence was low (out of those who logged in at least once, 19.01% [21/110] completed at least 50% modules in SPHERE and 7.76% [9/116] set a goal for trying out a given trigger-specific recommendation in PRISM). Acceptability ratings were intermediate.

Self-guided iCBTs were not found to be superior in our primary ITT analysis. Low adherence could explain the lack of effects as completer analysis showed effects for both interventions. Enhancement of adherence should be a focus of future research.

Our aim was to explore the experiences of individuals receiving emergency department (ED) care for acute headaches.

Patients with headache exacerbations commonly present to EDs. This study explored the experiences of adult patients during the exacerbation period, specifically using photovoice.

Recruited from two urban EDs in Alberta, Canada, participants with primary headaches took photographs over 3–4 weeks and subsequently completed a 60–90 minute, one-on-one, in-person photo-elicitation interview. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and thematically analyzed alongside photographs.

Eight participants (six women) completed the study. The average age was 42 years (standard deviation: 16). Five themes emerged: (1) the struggle for legitimacy in light of the invisibility of their condition; (2) the importance of hope, hopelessness and fear in the day-to-day life of participants; (3) the importance of agency and becoming “your own advocate”; (4) the struggle to be and be seen as themselves despite the encroachment of their headaches; and (5) the realities of “good” and “bad” care in the ED. Participants highlighted examples of good care, specifically when they felt seen and believed. Additionally, some expressed the acute care space itself being a beacon of hope in the midst of their crisis. Others felt dismissed because providers “know it’s not life or death.”

This study highlighted the substantial emotional impact that primary headaches have on the lives of participants, particularly during times of exacerbation and while seeking acute care. This provides insight for acute care settings and practitioners on how to effectively engage with this population.

We aimed to (1) report updated estimates of direct healthcare costs for people living with MS (pwMS), (2) contrast costs to a control population and (3) explore differences between disability levels among pwMS.

Administrative data were used to identify adult pwMS (MS cohort) and without (control cohort) in Alberta, Canada; disability level (based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale) among pwMS was estimated. One- and two-part generalized linear models with gamma distribution were used to estimate the incremental direct healthcare cost (2021 $CDN) of MS during a 1-year observation period.

Adjusting for confounders, the total healthcare cost ratio was higher in the MS cohort (n = 13,089) versus control (n = 150,080) (5.24 [95% CI: 5.08, 5.41]) with a predicted incremental cost of $15,016 (95% CI: $14,497, $15,535) per person-year. Among the MS cohort, total predicted direct healthcare costs were higher with greater disability, $14,430 (95% CI: $13,980, $14,880) to $58,697 ($51,514, $65,879) per person-year in mild and severe disability, respectively. The primary health resource cost component shifted from disease-modifying therapies in mild disability to supportive care in moderate and severe disability.

Adult pwMS had greater direct healthcare costs than those without. Extrapolating to the population level (where 14,485 adult pwMS were identified in the study), it is estimated that $218 million per year in healthcare costs may be attributable to MS in Alberta. The significantly larger economic impact associated with greater disability underscores the importance of preventing or delaying disease progression and functional impairment in MS.

Autoimmune encephalidities (AIE) are becoming an increasingly recognized cause of encephalitis. While diagnosis and acute management are well described, information on long-term management and outcomes is limited. Given this, we reviewed 5 years of AIE patients, reporting on chronic management, relapse incidence and possible relapse predictors.

We performed a chart review of all patients with non-paraneoplastic AIE presenting to Calgary Neuro-Immunology Clinic and Tom Baker Cancer Centre between 2015 and 2020. Severity of relapse was determined using the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE). Variables were assessed with descriptive analysis and/or t-test.

Patients were followed for a mean of 38.2 months. Outcome data were assessable in 37/38 patients. Relapse rate ranged from 0% (GFAP) to 67% (NMDA), with a mean of 46%. Most relapses (76%) occurred within 3 years. Time to treatment initiation at relapse was significantly shorter than initial presentation (p = 0.0015), and patients had less severe relapses compared to initial presentation (CASE score 5.18 vs 6.53; p = 0.040).

Use of chronic immunotherapy did not appear to impact overall relapse risk, although patients on any immunotherapy at relapse had milder relapses based on ΔCASE (p = 0.0035).

Relapse was not uncommon (46%) for various AIE subtypes in our cohort, particularly within the first 3 years. Our data enforce the importance of long-term follow-up, which in our study allowed for earlier treatment and less severe relapses compared to initial presentation, as well as the need to further explore which patients would benefit from chronic immunotherapy.