Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:48:25.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Natalizumab for Treatment of MS: Do the Risks Still Outweigh the Gains?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Mark Freedman*
Affiliation:
The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2012

References

1.Goodin, DS, Reder, AT, Ebers, GC, et al.Survival in MS: a randomized cohort study 21 years after the start of the pivotal IFNbeta-1b trial. Neurology. 2012;78(17):131522.Google Scholar
2.O’Connor, P.Natalizumab risk stratification: role of a two-step anti-JCV antibody assay. Can J Neurol Sci. 2012;39(5):6705.Google Scholar
3.Miravalle, A, Jensen, R, Kinkel, RP.Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in patients with multiple sclerosis following cessation of natalizumab therapy. Arch Neurol. 2011; 68(2):18691.Google Scholar
4.Goodin, DS.Disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: update and clinical implications. Neurology. 2008;71(24 Suppl 3):S813.Google Scholar
5.Havrdova, E, Galetta, S, Hutchinson, M, et al.Effect of natalizumab on clinical and radiological disease activity in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of the Natalizumab Safety and Efficacy in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (AFFIRM) study. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(3):25460.Google Scholar
6.Freedman, MS.Multiple Sclerosis therapeutic strategies: use second line agents as first-line agents when time is of the essence.. Neurol Clin Prac. 2011;1(1):668.Google Scholar