Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:32:04.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weakly Purely Finitely Additive Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Gottfried T. Rüttimann
Gottfried T. Rüttimann*
Affiliation:
University of Berne Berne, Switzerland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let L be an orthomodular poset. A positive measure ξ on L is said to be weakly purely finitely additive if the zero measure is the only completely additive measure majorized by ξ. It was shown in [15] that, in an arbitrary orthomodular poset L, every positive measures μ is the sum v + ξ of a positive completely additive measure v and a weakly purely finitely additive measure ξ. We give sufficient conditions for this Yosida-Hewitt-type decomposition to be unique.

A positive measure λ on L is said to be filtering if every non-zero element p in L majorizes a non-zero element q on which λ vanishes. A filtering measure is weakly purely finitely additive. Filtering measures play a mediator role throughout these investigations since some of the aforementioned conditions are given in terms of these.

The results obtained here are then viewed in the context of Boolean lattices and applied to lattices of idempotents of non-associative JBW-algebras.

Keywords

28A6006C1581P10orthomodular latticecompletely additive measureweakly purely finitely additive measurefiltering measuredecomposition of measures
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , 01 August 1994 , pp. 872 - 885
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1994

References

1. Alfsen, E. M., Compact Convex Sets and Boundary Integrals, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1971.Google Scholar
2. Battaglia, M., Annihilators in JB-Algebras, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philps. Soc. 108(1990), 317–323.Google Scholar
3. Birkhoff, G., Lattice Theory, Third edition, Amer. Math. Soc, Providence R.I., 1967.Google Scholar
4. Bunce, L. J. and Wright, J. D. M., Continuity and Linear Extensions of Quantum Measures on Jordan Operator Algebras, Math. Scand. 64(1989), 300ߝ306.Google Scholar
5. Edwards, C. M. and Riittimann, G. T., On the Facial Structure of the Unit Balls in a GL-Space and its Dual, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 98(1985), 305–322.Google Scholar
6. Greechie, R. J., Orthomodular Lattices Admitting No States, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 10(1971), 119–132.Google Scholar
7. Hanche-Olsen, H. and Størmer, E., Jordan Operator Algebras, Pitman, Boston, 1984.Google Scholar
8. Kalmbach, G., Orthomodular Lattices, Academic Press, London, 1983.Google Scholar
9. Navara, M. and Rüttimann, G. T., A Characterization of σ-State Spaces of Orthomodular Lattices, Exposition. Math. 9(1991), 275–284.Google Scholar
10. Rüttimann, G. T., Lecture Notes on Base Normed and Order Unit Normed Spaces, University of Denver, 1984.Google Scholar
11. Rüttimann, G. T., Facial Sets of Probability Measures, Probab. Math. Statist. (Wrocłav) 6(1985), 187–215.Google Scholar
12. Rüttimann, G. T. and Schindler, Chr., The Lebesgue Decomposition of Measures on Orthomodular Posets, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 37(1986), 321–345.Google Scholar
13. Rüttimann, G. T. and Schindler, Chr., On a-convex Sets of Probability Measures, Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Math. 35(1987), 583–595.Google Scholar
14. Rüttimann, G. T., The Approximate Jordan-Hahn Decomposition, Canad. J. Math. 41(1989), 1124–1146.Google Scholar
15. Rüttimann, G. T., Decomposition of Cones of Measures, Atti Sem. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena 38(1990), 267–269.Google Scholar
16. Takesaki, M., Theory of Operator Algebras I, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1979.Google Scholar
17. Yosida, K. and Hewitt, E., Finitely Additive Measures, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 72(1952), 46–66.Google Scholar