Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:43:48.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Local Convexity of Intersection Bodies of Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

M. Angeles Alfonseca  and
Jaegil Kim
M. Angeles Alfonseca
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, North Dakota State University, Fargo ND 58018, USA. e-mail: [email protected]
Jaegil Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB. e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One of the fundamental results in convex geometry is Busemann's theorem, which states that the intersection body of a symmetric convex body is convex. Thus, it is only natural to ask if there is a quantitative version of Busemann's theorem, i.e., if the intersection body operation actually improves convexity. In this paper we concentrate on the symmetric bodies of revolution to provide several results on the (strict) improvement of convexity under the intersection body operation. It is shown that the intersection body of a symmetric convex body of revolution has the same asymptotic behavior near the equator as the Euclidean ball. We apply this result to show that in sufficiently high dimension the double intersection body of a symmetric convex body of revolution is very close to an ellipsoid in the Banach–Mazur distance. We also prove results on the local convexity at the equator of intersection bodies in the class of star bodies of revolution.

Keywords

52A2052A3844A12convex bodiesintersection bodies of star bodiesBusemann's theoremlocal convexity
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , 01 February 2015 , pp. 3 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2015

References

[1] Alfonseca, M. A., An extension of a result by Lonke to intersection bodies. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 371(2010), no. 1, 146–157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.04.073 Google Scholar
[2] Busemann, H., A theorem of convex bodies of the Brunn-Minkowski type. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 35(1949), 27–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.35.1.27 Google Scholar
[3] Fish, A., Nazarov, F., Ryabogin, D., and Zvavitch, A., The unit ball is an attractor of the intersection body operator. Adv. Math. 226(2011), no. 3, 2629–2642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2010.07.018 Google Scholar
[4] Gardner, R. J., Geometric tomography. Second ed. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 58, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.Google Scholar
[5] Grinberg, E. and Zhang, G., Convolutions, transforms, and convexl bodies. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 78(1999), no. 1, 77–115.http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/S0024611599001653 Google Scholar
[6] Hensley, D., Slicing convex bodies—bounds for slice area in terms of the body's covariance. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 79(1980), no. 4, 619–625.Google Scholar
[7] Kim, J., Yaskin, V., and Zvavitch, A., The geometry of p–convex intersection bodies. Adv. Math. 226(2011), no. 6, 5320–5337.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2011.01.011 Google Scholar
[8] Koldobsky, A., Fourier analysis in convex geometry. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 116, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005.Google Scholar
[9] Koldobsky, A. and Yaskin, V., The interface between convex geometry and harmonic analysis. CBMS Regional Conference Series, 108, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008.Google Scholar
[10] Lutwak, E., Intersection bodies and dual mixed volumes. Adv. in Math. 71(1988), no. 2, 232–261.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(88)90077-1 Google Scholar
[11] Lutwak, E., Selected affine isoperimetric inequalities. In: Handbook of convex geometry, Vol. A, B, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 151–176.Google Scholar