Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:26:46.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Certain Classes of Unitary Representations for Split Classical Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Goran Muić
Goran Muić*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Zagreb, Bijenicka 30, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we prove the unitarity of duals of tempered representations supported on minimal parabolic subgroups for split classical $p$-adic groups. We also construct a family of unitary spherical representations for real and complex classical groups.

Keywords

22E3522E5011F70
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , 01 February 2007 , pp. 148 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2007

References

[A] Aubert, A. M., Dualité dans le groupe de Grothendieck de la catégorie des représentations lisses de longueur finie d’un groupe réductif p-adique. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 347(1995), 2179–2189 (and Erratum, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc 348(1996), 4687–4690).Google Scholar
[B] Ban, D., Parabolic inducition and Jacquet modules of representations of O(2n, F). Glas. Mat. Ser. III 34(54)(1999), 147–185.Google Scholar
[Ba] Barbasch, D., The unitary dual for complex classical Lie groups. Invent. Math. 96(1989), 103–176.Google Scholar
[BM1] Barbasch, D. and Moy, A., A unitary criterion for p-adic groups. Invent. Math. 98(1989), 19–37.Google Scholar
[BM2] Barbasch, D. and Moy, A., Reduction to real infinitesimal character in affine Hecke algebras. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 6(1993), 611–635.Google Scholar
[Car] Cartier, P. Representations of p-adic groups: a survey. In: Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 33, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1979, pp. 111–155.Google Scholar
[Jan1] Jantzen, C. Duality and supports for induced representations of orthogonal groups. Canad. J. Math. 57(2005), no. 1, 159–179.Google Scholar
[Jan2] Jantzen, C., Jacquet modules of p-adic general linear groups. Preprint http://personal.ecu.edu/jantzenc/driverGL.pdf Google Scholar
[JK] Jantzen, C. and Kim, H., Parametrization of the image of normalized intertwining operators. Pacific J. Math. 199(2001), 367–415.Google Scholar
[K1] Kim, H., The residual spectrum of G2 . Canad. J. Math. 48(1996), 1245–1272.Google Scholar
[K2] Kim, H., Residual spectrum of odd orthogonal groups. Internat. Math. Res. Notices 17(2001), 873–906.Google Scholar
[KR] Kudla, S. S. and Rallis, S., Ramified degenerate principal series representations for Sp(n). Israel J. Math. 78(1992), 209–256.Google Scholar
[KSh] Keys, K. and Shahidi, F., Artin L-functions and normalization of intertwining operators. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 21(1988), 67–89.Google Scholar
[La] Langlands, R. P., On the notion of an automorphic representation. In: Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 33, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1979, pp. 203–207. (This is a supplement to: Borel, A. and Jacquet, H., Automorphic forms and automorphic representations. pp. 189–202.)Google Scholar
[LMT] Lapid, E., Muić, G., and Tadić, M., On the generic unitary dual of quasisplit classical groups. Intnat. Math. Res. Notices (2004), no. 26, 1335–1354.Google Scholar
[Mœ1] Mœglin, C., Orbites unipotentes et spectre discret non ramifié: le cas des groupes classiques déployés. Compositio Math. 77(1991), 1–54.Google Scholar
[Mœ2] Lapid, E., Muić, G., and Tadić, M., Représentations unipotentes et formes automorphes de carré intégrable. Forum Math. 6(1994), 651–744.Google Scholar
[Mœ3] Lapid, E., Muić, G., and Tadić, M., Sur la classification des séries discrètes des groupes classiques p-adiques: paramètres de Langlands et exhaustivité. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 4(2002), 143–200.Google Scholar
[MT] Mœglin, C. and Tadić, M., Construction of discrete series for classical p-adic groups. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15(2002), 715–786.Google Scholar
[MW1] Mœglin, C. and Waldspurger, J.-L., Sur l’ involution de Zelevinski. J. Reine Angew. Math. 372(1986), 136–177.Google Scholar
[MW2] Mœglin, C. and Waldspurger, J.-L., Le spectre résiduel de GL(n). Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 22(1989), 605–674.Google Scholar
[MW3] Mœglin, C. and Waldspurger, J.-L., Spectral Decomposition and Eisenstein Series. Une paraphrase de l’criture. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 113, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.Google Scholar
[MVW] Moeglin, C., Vignéras, M.-F., and Waldspurger, J.-L., Correspondence de Howe sur un corps p-adique. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1291, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.Google Scholar
[M1] Muić, G., The unitary dual of p-adic G 2 . Duke Math. J. 90(1997), 465–493.Google Scholar
[M2] Muić, G., Some results on square integrable representations; Irreducibility of standard representations. Internat. Math. Res. Notices (1998), no. 14, 705–726.Google Scholar
[M3] Muić, G., Reducibility of generalized principal series. Canad. J. Math. 57(2005), 616–647.Google Scholar
[M4] Muić, G., On the non-unitary unramified dual for classical p-adic groups. Trans. Amer.Math. Soc 350(2006), 4653–4687.Google Scholar
[SS] Schneider, P. and Stuhler, U., Representation theory and sheaves on the Bruhat–Tits building. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 85(1997), 97–191.Google Scholar
[Sh1] Shahidi, F., Fourier transforms of intertwining operators and Plancherel measures for GL(n). Amer. J. Math. 106(1984), 67–111.Google Scholar
[Sh2] Shahidi, F., A proof of Langland's conjecture on Plancherel measures; complementary series for p-adic groups. Ann. of Math. 132(1990), 273–330.Google Scholar
[Sh3] Shahidi, F., Twisted endoscopy and reducibility of induced representations for p-adic groups. Duke Math. J. 66(1992), 1–41.Google Scholar
[Sp] Speh, B., Unitary representations of GL(n, ℝ) with nontrivial (g, K)-cohomology. Invent. Math. 71(1983), 443–465.Google Scholar
[T1] Tadić, M., Classification of unitary representations in irreducible representations of general linear group (non-Archimedean case). Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 19(1986), 335–382.Google Scholar
[T2] Tadić, M., An external approach to unitary representations. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 28(1993), 215–252.Google Scholar
[T3] Tadić, M., Structure arising from induction and Jacquet modules of representations of classical p–adic groups. J. Algebra 177(1995), 1–33.Google Scholar
[Ta] Tate, J., Number theoretic background. In: Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 33, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1979, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
[W] Waldspurger, J.-L., La formule de Plancherel pour les groupes p-adiques, d’après Harish-Chandra. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 2(2003), 235–333.Google Scholar
[Ža] Žampera, S., The residual spectrum of the group of type G 2 . J. Math. Pures Appl. 76(1997), 805–835.Google Scholar
[Ze] Zelevinsky, A. V., Induced representations of reductive p-adic groups. II. On irreducible representations of GL(n). Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 13(1980), 165–210.Google Scholar