We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Anttila, Raimo1972An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo1977Analogy. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo1991Field Theory of Meaning and Semantic Change. Linguistic Agency University of Duisburg, Series A, Paper No. 301. Duisburg: LAUD.Google Scholar
Becker, Thomas1990Analogie und morphologische Theorie. Münchner Universitäts-Schriften — Philosophische Fakultät, Studien zur Theoretischen Lin guistik11.) Munich: Fink. [University of Munich dissertation.]Google Scholar
Fasold, Ralph W.1978Language Variation and Linguistic Competence. Pp. 85–95 in Lin guistic Variation: Models and Methods. Sankoff, David, ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R.1980Variation in the Group and the Individual: The Case of Final Stop Deletion. Pp. 1–54 in Locating Language in Time and Space. Labov, William, ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Holyoak, Keith J., and Thagard, Paul1989Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction. Cognitive Science13:295–355.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul1973Productivity in Phonology. Pp. 169–176 in Issues in Phonologi cal Theory: Proceedings of the Urbana Conference on Phonology. Kenstowicz, Michael J. and Kisseberth, Charles W., eds. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
KKTK = Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus [Research Centre for Domestic Languages] (n.d.) Microfiche of statistical analysis of approximately 610,000 words of text from 26 issues of Suomen Kuvalehti [1975:36 to 1976:11]. Helsinki: KKTK.Google Scholar
Laalo, Klaus1988Imperfektimuotojen ti ~ si-vaihtelu suomen kielessä. [ti ~ si Alternation of the Imperfect Forms in the Finnish language.]Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura. [University of Helsinki dissertation.]Google Scholar
Laalo, Klaus1991Riittääkö analogia yksin – eikö sääntöjä tarvita? [Does Analogy Alone Suffice — Or Does One not Need Rules?]Virittäjä95:85–88 [Review of Skousen, 1989.]Google Scholar
Labov, William1973The Boundaries of Words and Their Meanings. Pp. 340–373 in New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English. Bailey, Charles-James N. and Shuy, Roger, eds. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, James L., and Rumelhart, David E.1980An Interactive Activation Model of the Effect of Context in Perception. Center for Human Information Processing (CHIP) 91. La Jolla: Center for Human Information Processing, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar