Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:32:18.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Noam Chomsky. 2015. The Minimalist Program, 20th anniversary edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. xiii + 393. US $30 (softcover). - Noam Chomsky. 2015. Aspects of the theory of syntax, 50th anniversary edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. xx + 270. US $28 (softcover).

Review products

Noam Chomsky. 2015. The Minimalist Program, 20th anniversary edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. xiii + 393. US $30 (softcover).

Noam Chomsky. 2015. Aspects of the theory of syntax, 50th anniversary edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. xx + 270. US $28 (softcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2018

Dennis Ott*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
© Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1995. In terms of Merge: Copy and head movement. In Papers on minimalist syntax, ed. Pensalfini, Rob and Ura, Hiroyuki, 4164. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1975. The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York: Plenum. Excerpted from 1956 revision of 1955 ms., Harvard University and MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, Volume 3, ed. Belletti, Adriana, 104131. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 122.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2006. Approaching UG from below. In Interfaces + recursion = language?, ed. Sauerland, Uli and Gärtner, Hans-Martin, 129. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 3349.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Gallego, Ángel J., and Ott, Dennis. To appear. Generative grammar and the Faculty of Language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Citko, Barbara. 2005. On the nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge, and Parallel Merge. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4): 475496.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 2017. Merge(X,Y) = {X,Y}. In Labels and roots, ed. Bauke, Leah and Blümel, Andreas, 4768. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gallego, Ángel J., and Ott, Dennis, ed. 2015. 50 years later: Reflections on Chomsky's Aspects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 77.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken, and Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The view from Building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Hale, Ken and Keyser, Samuel Jay, 53110. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ott, Dennis. 2017. Strong generative capacity and the empirical base of linguistic theory. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1617.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 2016. Contiguity theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1998. The rough guide to the Minimalist Program: Concordance of intratextual references in Chomsky's “Chapter Four”. Glot International 3: 2324. (http://bit.ly/2AIKwah)Google Scholar