Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:38:31.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

French Quadri-Phonematic Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

G. L. Bursill-Hall
G. L. Bursill-Hall*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The structural linguist has recently begun to pay more and more attention not only to the sequences of the phonemes of a language but also to their capacity for combination. Trubetzkoy said: “La neutralisation des oppositions phonologiques est sûrement le phénomène le plus important, mais nullement le seul important dans le domaine de la théorie des combinaisons”. Much has been done on the distribution of these phonemic combinations and their functional yield, but little to determine and systematise the frequency of such occurrences, and to deduce from them some general principle. This is particularly true with reference to the consonantal clusters of the French language, though more has been done with other languages especially English.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Spring 1959 , pp. 35 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Trubetzkoy, N. S., Principes de Phonologie (trad. J. Cantineau), Paris, (1949): 262 Google Scholar.

2. Benveniste, E., “Répartition des Consonnes et Phonologie du Mot”, TCLP, VIII: 27–35 Google Scholar.

Fisher-Jorgensen, E., “On the definition of phoneme categories on a distribution basis,” Acta Linguistica, VII: 8–39 Google Scholar.

Harris, Z. S., Methods in Structural Linguistics, Chicago, 1951 Google Scholar.

Martinet, A., “Function Structure, and Sound Change,” Word, VIII: 1–32 Google Scholar.

Mathesius, V., “Zum Problem des Belastungs- und Kombinationsfähigkeit der Phoneme,” TCLP IV, 148–152 Google Scholar.

O’Connor, J. D., and Trim, J. L. M., “Vowel, Consonant, and Syllable a Phonological Definition,” Word, IX: 102–122 Google Scholar.

Trubetzkoy, N. S., Op. cit., 262–276 Google Scholar.

Whorf, B. L., “Linguistics as an exact science,” Technology Review 43:2. 3–8 Google Scholar.

3. Mathesius, V., “La Structure phonologique du lexique du tchèque moderne”, TCLP I,: 67–85 Google Scholar.

Saporta, S., “Frequency of Consonant Clusters,” Language, XXI: 25–30 Google Scholar.

Trnka, B., “Some remarks on the Phonological Structure of English,” Xenia Pragensia, (1929): 357–364 Google Scholar.

Trnka, B., “A Phonological Analysis of Present-Day Standard English,” Studies in English, Prague, V, (1935)Google Scholar.

Twaddell, W. F., “A Phonological Analysis of Intervocalic Consonant Clusters in Modern German,” Actes du IVe Congrès de Linguistes Copenhague, 1938 Google Scholar.

Twaddell, W. F., “Combinations of Consonants in Stressed Syllables in German,” Acta Ldnguistica, I,: 189–198: II, 31–50 Google Scholar.

4. Trnka, B., “General Laws of Phonemic Combinations,” TCLP VI,: 57–62 Google Scholar.

5 Trubetzkoy, N. S., Op. cit., 264 Google Scholar.

6 Trubetzkoy, N. S., Op. cit., 264–268 Google Scholar.

7 Trubetzkoy, N. S., Op. cit., 269 Google Scholar.

8. Damourette, J. et Pichon, E., Des Mots à la Pensée, Essai de Grammaire de la Langue Française (Tome I), Paris, (1927): 190–195 Google Scholar.

9. Hall, R. A. Jr., “French: Structural Sketch I,” Language Monographs 24, Baltimore, 1948 Google Scholar.

10. Gougenheim, G., Eléments de Phonologie Française, Strasbourg, 1935 Google Scholar.

11. Nouveau Petit Larousse Illustré, Dictionnaire Encyclopédique, Paris, 1938.

12. Vander Beke, G. B., French Word Book, New York, 1929 Google Scholar.

13. Malécot, A., The elision of the French mute-e within complex consonantal clusters, Lingua V. 1, 45–60 Google Scholar.

14. Malécot, A., Op. cit.Google Scholar

15. Martinet, A., La Prononciation du français contemporain, Paris, 1945, 46 Google Scholar.

16. Malécot, A., Op. cit., 45–46 Google Scholar.

17. Leray, F., “La Loi des trois consonnes”, Revue de philologie et de littérature, XLII, (1930): 183 Google Scholar.

18. Martinet, A., La Prononciation du français contemporain, Paris, 1845, 46–53 Google Scholar.

19. Malécot, A., Op. cit., 57–59 Google Scholar.

20. Martinet, A., Op. cit., 46 Google Scholar.