No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2014
1. See Twight, C., America's Emerging Fascist Economy (New York: Arlington House Publishers, 1975)Google Scholar.
2. Pharr, S. and Badaracco, J., “Coping with Crisis: Environmental Regulation,” in America versus Japan (McGraw, T. K., ed., Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1986), 229Google Scholar.
3. Ibid., 235–237.
4. In re ‘Agent Orange’ Product Liability Litigation, 597 F. Supp. 740 (E.D.N.Y. 1984), 611 F. Supp. 1223 (E.D.N.Y. 1985), 611 F. Supp. 1396 (E.D.N.Y. 1984).
5. Wall Street Journal, January 13, 1987, 1, column 1.
6. Schuck, Peter H., Agent Orange on Trial: Mass Toxic Disasters in the Courts (Cambridge, Mass.: Press of the Harvard University Press, 1986), 73Google Scholar.
7. Ibid., 80.
8. Ibid., 267.
9. Ibid., 234.
10. 597 F. Supp. 740, 833-834.
11. Allen v. United States, 588 F. Supp. 247, 412–415 (D. Utah 1984).
12. Schuck, , Agent Orange on Trial, 118Google Scholar.
13. Ibid., 112.
14. The settlement approval was appealed after Schuck's book was published. See Orloff, N., “Theories of Cancer and Rules of Causation,” Jurimetrics 27 (1987), 255, 258Google Scholar.
15. Schuck, , Agent Orange on Trial, 196Google Scholar.
16. Ibid., 197.
17. Ibid., 223.
18. Rosenberg, D., “The Causal Connection in Mass Exposure Cases: A ‘Public Law’ Vision of the Tort System,” Harvard Law Review 97 (1984), 851CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
19. Huber, P., “Safety and the Second Best: The Hazards of Public Risk Management in the Courts,” Columbia Law Review 85 (1985), 277CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20. Schuck, , Agent Orange on Trial, 290Google Scholar.