Introduction: Head injuries are a commonly encountered presentation in emergency departments (ED) and the Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) campaign was released in June 2015 in an attempt to decrease imaging utilization for patients with minor head injuries. The impact of the CWC campaign on imaging utilization for head injuries has not been explored in the ED setting. In our study, we describe the characteristics of patients with head injuries presenting to a tertiary care academic ED and the impact of the CWC campaign on CT head utilization. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used linked databases from the province of Ontario, Canada to assess emergency department visits with a primary diagnosis of head injury made between June 1, 2014 and Aug 31, 2016 at the University Health Network in Toronto, Canada. We examined the number of visits during the study period, the proportion of patients that had a CT head performed before and after the release of the CWC campaign, as well as mode of arrival, and disposition. Results: There were 4,322 qualifying visits at our site during the study period. The median presenting age was 44.12 years (IQR 27.83,67.45), the median GCS was 15 (IQR 15,15) and the majority of patients presenting had intermediate acuity (CTAS 3). Overall, 43.17% of patients arrived via ambulance, 49.24 % of patients received a CT head and 10.46% of patients were admitted. Compared to patients presenting before the CWC campaign release, there was no significant difference in the rate of CT heads after the CWC (50.41% vs 47.68%, P=0.07). There were also no significant differences between the two groups in mode of arrival (ambulance vs ambulatory) (42.94% vs 43.48%, P=0.72) or admission rates (9.85% vs 11.26%, P=0.15). However, more patients belonged to the high acuity groups (CTAS 1 or 2) in the post CWC campaign release group (12.98% vs 8.11% P<0.001). Conclusion: Visits for head injuries make up a significant proportion of total ED visits and approximately half of these patients receive CT imaging in the ED. The CWC campaign did not seem to impact imaging utilization for head injuries in the 14 months following its launch. Further efforts, including local quality improvement initiatives, are likely needed to increase adherence to its recommendation and reduce imaging utilization for head injuries.

Introduction: High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential for patient survival. Typically, CPR quality is only measured during the first 10 minutes of resuscitation. There is limited research examining the quality of CPR over the entire duration of resuscitation.Objective: To examine the quality of CPR over the entire duration of resuscitation and correlate the quality of CPR to patient survival. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study using data from the Toronto RescuNET Epistry-Cardiac Arrest database. We included consecutive, adult (>18) OHCA treated by EMS between January 1, 2014 and September 30, 2015. High-quality CPR was defined, in accordance with 2015 AHA Guidelines, as a chest compression rate of 100-120/min, depth of 5.0-6.0 cm and chest compression fraction (ccf) of >0.80. We further categorized high-quality resuscitation as meeting benchmarks >80% of the time, moderate-quality between 50-80% and low-quality meeting benchmarks <50% of the resuscitation. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine association between variables of interest, including CPR quality metrics, and survival to hospital discharge. Results: A total of 5,208 OHCA met our inclusion criteria with a survival rate of 8%. The median (IQR) duration of resuscitation was 23.0 min (15.0,32.7). Overall CPR quality was considered high-quality for ccf in 81% of resuscitation episodes, 41% for rate, and 7% for depth. The percentage of resuscitations meeting the quality benchmarks differed between survivors and non-survivors for both depth (15% vs 6%) and ccf (61% vs 83%) (P value <0.001). After controlling for Utstein variables maintaining a chest compression depth within recommendations for >80% showed a trend towards improved survival (OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.96, 2.92). Other variables associated with survival were public location, initial CPR by EMS providers or bystanders, witnessed cardiac arrest (EMS or bystander), and initial shockable rhythm. Increasing age and longer duration of resuscitation were associated with decreased survival. Conclusion: Overall, EMS providers were not able to maintain rate or depth within guideline recommendations for the majority of the duration of resuscitation. Maintaining chest compression depth for greater than 80% of the resuscitation showed a trend towards increased survival from OHCA.

Introduction: With one person in Canada suffering an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) every 12 minutes and an estimated survival to hospital discharge with good neurologic function ranging from 3 to 16%, OHCA represents a major source of morbidity and mortality. An evolving adjunct for resuscitation of OHCA patients is the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-assisted CPR (ECPR). The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the survival to hospital discharge with good neurologic recovery in patients suffering from OHCA treated with ECPR compared to those who received standard advanced cardiac life support with conventional CPR (CCPR) alone. Methods: A systematic database search of both MEDLINE & EMBASE was performed up until September 2016 to identify studies with ≥5 patients reporting ECPR use in adults (age ≥16 years) with OHCA. Only studies reporting survival to hospital discharge were included. All identified studies were assessed independently using pre-determined inclusion criteria by two reviewers. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa regulations assessment scale. Results: Of the 1065 records identified, 54 studies met all inclusion criteria. Inter-rater reliability was high with a kappa statistic of 0.85. The majority of studies were comprised of case series (n=45) of ECPR with 5 to 83 patients/study. Out of the 45 case series, 37 presented neurologic data at hospital discharge and demonstrated a broad range of patients surviving with good neurologic outcome (0 to 71.4%). Only 9 cohort studies with relevant control group (CCPR) were identified (38 to 21750 patients/study). Preliminary analysis demonstrated that 6 cohort studies were sufficient quality to compare ECPR to CCPR. All 6 studies showed significantly increased survival to hospital discharge with good neurologic recovery (ECPR 10.6 to 41.6% vs CCPR 1.5 to 7.7%, respectively). Conclusion: Given the paucity of studies using appropriate comparators to evaluate the impact of ECMO, our confidence in a clinically relevant difference in outcomes compared to current standards of care for OHCA remains weak. Interestingly, a limited number of studies with suitable controls demonstrated a potential benefit associated with ECPR in the management of OHCA in selected patients. In this state of equipoise, high quality RCT data is urgently needed.

Introduction: Sleep deprivation negatively affects cognitive and behavioural performance. Emergency Medicine (EM) residents commonly work night shifts and are then expected to perform with competence. This study examines the impact of night shifts on EM resident performance in simulated resuscitation scenarios. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was completed at a single Canadian academic centre where residents participate in twice-annual simulation-based resuscitation objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). OSCE scores for all EM residents between 2010-2016 were collected, as well as post-graduate year (PGY1-5), gender, and shift schedules. OSCEs were scored using the Queen’s Simulation Assessment Tool (QSAT) evaluating four domains: primary assessment, diagnostic actions, therapeutic actions and communication, and an overall global assessment score (GAS). A night shift was defined as a late evening (beyond 23:00) or overnight shift within the three days before an OSCE. A mixed effects linear regression model was used to model the association between night shifts and OSCE scores while adjusting for gender and PGY. Results: A total of 136 OSCE scores were collected from 56 residents. PGY-5 residents had 37.1% (31.3 to 34.0%; p<0.01) higher OSCE scores than those in PGY-1 with an average increase of 8.8% (7.5 to 10.1%; p<0.01) per year. Working one or more night shifts in the three days before an OSCE reduced the total and communication scores by an average of 3.8% (p=0.04) and 4.5% (p=0.04) respectively. We observed a significant gender difference in the effects of acute shift work (p=0.03). Working a night shift one night prior to an OSCE was not associated with total score among male residents (p=0.33) but was associated with a 6.1% (-11.9 to -0.2; p=0.04) decrease in total score among female residents. This difference was consistent across PGY and was primarily due to an 8.5% (-15.5 to -1.6%; p=0.02) decrease in communication scores and a 6.7% (-13.1 to -0.3%; p=0.04) reduction in GAS. Conclusion: Proximity to night shifts significantly impaired the performance of EM trainees in simulated resuscitation scenarios, particularly in the domain of communication. For female residents, the magnitude of difference in total scores after working such shifts one night prior to a resuscitation OSCE was approximately equal to the difference seen between residents one year apart in training.

Introduction: Survival for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is typically 8-12%. Recent evidence has shown that public access automatic external defibrillators (AED) may improve survival. The objectives of this study were to determine whether AEDs improve rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), overall survival, and favourable neurological survival (FNS) in Canada. Methods: The BC Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium prospectively collected detailed prehospital and hospital data on consecutive non-traumatic OHCAs from 2011-2015 within BC’s four metropolitan areas. We included all EMS-treated adult patients. Data were collected in accordance with recognized Utstein criteria. We described frequencies with counts, means and medians where appropriate, and the Z-test was used to compare population proportions. Results: We examined 7577 OHCAs from 2011-2015. AEDs were deployed on 223 patients in this period (mean age 60.4 yrs [95% CI 45.7-75.1] and 83.9% male; non-AED OHCAs mean age 66.2 yrs [48.4-83.8] and 67.3% male). Seventy seven percent of AED deployments occurred in public locations, 69.1% were witnessed by bystanders and CPR was initiated in 98.7% of these cases. Fifteen percent of non-AED OHCAs occurred in public locations, 38.3% were bystander witnessed, and 45.4% received bystander CPR. AEDs delivered shocks to 61.4% of patients, and EMS crews found an initial shockable rhythm upon scene arrival in 60.5% of AED deployments (22.9% for non-AED cases). AED OHCA patients had higher rates of ROSC at any time (67.2% vs 47.6%; difference of 19.6% [12.9-26.2 p<0.01]), and ROSC at ED arrival (61% vs 35.4%; difference of 25.6% [19.2-32.0 p<0.01]). AED OHCA patients had higher rates of survival to hospital discharge (23.8% vs 8.5%; difference 15.3% [11.5-19.1 p<0.01]). Detailed neurologic outcome data was not available for all patients, yet for those which it was available AED OHCA patients had improved outcomes (modified Rankin score<2) compared to non-AED OHCA patients (9.0% vs 5.4%; difference 3.6% [0.6-6.6 p<0.02]. Conclusion: Automatic external defibrillators markedly improve rates of ROSC at any time, sustained ROSC at ED arrival, survival to hospital discharge, and FNS in Canada. Continued support for public access AED programs is essential to improve patient outcomes.

Introduction: Patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are frequently transported to the closest hospital after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often indicated as a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure following OHCA. This study aimed to determine the association between the type of destination hospital (PCI-capable or not) and survival to discharge for patients with OHCA and prehospital ROSC. We hypothesized that being transported to a PCI-capable hospital would be associated with a higher survival to discharge. Methods: The present study used a registry of adult OHCA between 2010 and 2015 in Montréal, Canada. We included adult patients with non-traumatic OHCA and prehospital ROSC. The association of interest was evaluated with a multivariate logistic regression model to control for demographic and clinical variables (age, gender, time of day, initial rhythm, witnessed arrest, bystander CPR, presence of first responders or advanced care paramedics, prehospital supraglottic airway placement, delay before paramedics’ arrival). Assuming a survival rate of 40% and 75% of the variability explained by other factors included in the model, more than 1200 patients needed to be included to detect an absolute difference of 10% in survival between both groups with a power of more than 90%. Results: A total of 1691 patients (1140 men and 551 women) with a mean age of 64 years (standard deviation 17) were included, of which 1071 (63%) were transported to a PCI-capable hospital. Among all patients, 704 patients (42%) survived to hospital discharge. We observed a significant independent association between survival to discharge and being transported to a PCI-capable hospital (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.46 [95% confidence interval 1.09-1.96]) after controlling for confounding variables. Having an initial shockable rhythm and presence of first responders also increased survival to discharge (AORs 3.67 [95% confidence interval 2.75-4.88] and 1.53 [95% confidence interval 1.12-2.09], respectively). Conclusion: Patients experiencing ROSC after OHCA could benefit from a direct transport to a PCI-capable hospital. This benefit might also be related to unmeasured interventions other than PCI these hospitals can provide (e.g. high-level intensive care or cardiovascular surgery).

Introduction: Most ambulance communication officers receive minimal education on agonal breathing, often leading to unrecognized out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We sought to evaluate the impact of an educational program on cardiac arrest recognition, and on bystander CPR and survival rates. Methods: Ambulance communication officers in Ottawa, Canada received additional training on agonal breathing, while the control site (Windsor, Canada) did not. Sites were compared to their pre-study performance (before-after design), and to each other (concurrent control). Trained investigators used a piloted-standardized data collection tool when reviewing the recordings for all potential OHCA cases submitted. OHCA was confirmed using our local OHCA registry, and we requested 9-1-1 recordings for OHCA cases not initially suspected. Two independent investigators reviewed medical records for non-OHCA cases receiving telephone-assisted CPR in Ottawa. We present descriptive and chi-square statistics. Results: There were 988 confirmed and suspected OHCA in the “before” (540 Ottawa; 448 Windsor), and 1,076 in the “after” group (689 Ottawa; 387 Windsor). Characteristics of “after” group OHCA patients were: mean age (68.1 Ottawa, 68.2 Windsor); Male (68.5% Ottawa, 64.8% Windsor); witnessed (45.0% Ottawa, 41.9% Windsor); and initial rhythm VF/VT (Ottawa 28.9, Windsor 22.5%). Before-after comparisons were: for cardiac arrest recognition (from 65.4% to 71.9% in Ottawa p=0.03; from 70.9% to 74.1% in Windsor p=0.37); for bystander CPR rates (from 23.0% to 35.9% in Ottawa p=0.0001; from 28.2% to 39.4% in Windsor p=0.001); and for survival to hospital discharge (from 4.1% to 12.5% in Ottawa p=0.001; from 3.9% to 6.9% in Windsor p=0.03). “After” group comparisons between Ottawa and Windsor (control) were not statistically different, except survival (p=0.02). Agonal breathing was common (25.6% Ottawa, 22.4% Windsor) and present in 18.5% of missed cases (15.8% Ottawa, 22.2% Windsor p=0.27). In Ottawa, 31 patients not in OHCA received chest compressions resulting from telephone-assisted CPR instructions. None suffered injury or adverse effects. Conclusion: While all OHCA outcomes improved over time, the educational intervention significantly improved OHCA recognition in Ottawa, and appeared to mitigate the impact of agonal breathing.

Introduction: This study aims to describe the long-term functional outcome and health-related quality of life of elderly (≥65 years old) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors in Victoria, Australia. Methods: Elderly OHCA patients who arrested between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2014 were identified from the Victorian Ambulance Cardiac Arrest Registry (VACAR). Living status, Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E), Euro-QoL (EQ-5D) and Twelve-item Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey were collected by telephone 12 months following the OHCA. Results: Emergency medical services attended on 14,678 elderly OHCA during the study period, 6,851 (46.7%) of which received a resuscitation attempt. Of these, 668 patients (9.8%) survived to hospital discharge. The mean age of the survivors was 75 (standard deviation (SD) 7.4) years and 504 (75.4%) were male. Eighty-five patients subsequently died within 12 months of their OHCA. A total of 483 patients were interviewed (response rate 82.9%). At 12 months, 313 responders (64.9%) were living at home without care. Most responders (n=324 (67.2%)) had a good long-term functional recovery with a GOS-E ≥7. The proportion of patients with a GOS-E≥7 progressively decreased with increasing age (65-74 years: 66.1%, 75-84 years: 53.0%,≥85 years: 27.3%). On the EQ-5D, the majority of survivors reported no problem with mobility (n=266 (55.1%)), self-care (n=403 (83.4%)), activity (n=293 (60.6%)), pain (n=335 (69.3%)) and anxiety (n=358 (74.1%)). On the SF-12, the mean mental component summary was 56.3 (SD 6.6) while the mean physical component summary was 44.7 (SD 11.4) (both measures range from 0-100). Among the 1,951 patients who arrested in a supported accommodation, 849 (43.5%) had a resuscitation attempt, and of these, 21 survived to hospital discharge (2.5%). Only eight (1.0%) of these patients were still alive 12 months after the OHCA and one survivor (0.12%) had a good functional outcome (GOS-E≥7). Conclusion: Most elderly OHCA survivors have an adequate long-term functional status and health-related quality of life. However, the likelihood of having a good functional recovery decreases with increasing age, and is rare for patients arresting in a supported accommodation.

Introduction: Sodium bicarbonate (SB) is still widely used for resuscitation in out-of- hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) despite limited clinical indications but the effect on neurological recovery is unclear. Methods: From 2006 to 2016, we prospectively conducted a province-wide population-based observational study of adult non-traumatic OHCA patients managed by EMS. According to provincial guidelines, paramedics administered SB to OHCA patients based on their clinical assessment. Outcome of interest was favorable neurological outcome at hospital discharge, defined as CPC of 1 and 2 or modified Rankin scale of 3 or less. We performed multivariable logistic regression, comparing the proportion of outcome between SB and non-SB groups, further stratified by the median of the length of resuscitation. We also applied propensity score matching technique adjusting for baseline characters to the same model to reduce potential selection bias. Results: Of 13,008 OHCA patients, 4,699 (36.1%) were managed with SB. In the SB treated group, 64 / 4,699 (1.3%) patients had favorable neurological outcomes, compared to 823 / 8,309 (9.9%) in the non-SB treated group (crude odds ratio [OR] 0.12, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.16). In logistic regression model, SB was associated with decreased probability of favorable outcomes (adjusted OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.89). Similarly, with stratification by length of resuscitation, the SB group had a lower probability of favorable outcomes (≦24 min: adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.02, >24 min: adjusted OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.97). In 1:1 propensity matched cohort including 5,126 OHCA patients, the adjusted association also persisted (adjusted OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.89). Conclusion: Prehospital administration of SB to OHCA patients was associated with worse neurological outcomes and the trend persisted even after stratification by resuscitation length.

Introduction: The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) is the standard used in all Canadian (and many international) emergency departments (EDs) for establishing the priority by which patients should be assessed. In addition to its clinical utility, CTAS has become an important administrative metric used by governments to estimate patient care requirements, ED funding and workload models. Despite its importance, the process by which CTAS scores are derived is highly variable. Emphasis on ED wait times has also drawn attention to the length of time the triage process takes. The primary objective of this study was to determine the interrater agreement of CTAS in current clinical practice. The secondary objective was to determine the time it takes to triage in a variety of ED settings. Methods: This was a prospective, observational study conducted in 7 hospital EDs, selected to represent a mix of triage processes (electronic vs. manual), documentation practices (electronic vs. paper), hospital types (rural, community and teaching) and patient volumes (annual ED census ranged from 38,000 to 136,000). An expert CTAS auditor observed on-duty triage nurses in the ED and assigned independent CTAS in real time. Research assistants not involved in the triage process independently recorded the triage time. Interrater agreement was estimated using unweighted and quadratic-weighted kappa statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: 738 consecutive patient CTAS assessments were audited over 21 seven-hour triage shifts. Exact modal agreement was achieved for 554 (75.0%) patients. Using the auditor’s CTAS score as the reference standard, on-duty triage nurses over-triaged 89 (12.1%) and under-triaged 95 (12.9%) patients. Interrater agreement was “good” with an unweighted kappa of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.67) and quadratic-weighted kappa of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.90). Research assistants captured triage time for 3808 patients over 69 shifts at 7 different EDs. Median (IQR) triage time was 5.2 (3.8, 7.3) minutes and ranged from 3.9 (3.1, 4.8) minutes to 7.5 (5.8, 10.8) minutes. Conclusion: Variability in the accuracy, and length of time taken to perform CTAS assessments suggest that a standardized approach to performing CTAS assessments would improve both clinical decision making, and administrative data accuracy.

Introduction: The use of procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for the performance of Emergency Department (ED) procedures has been reported to be safe and effective. However, few studies have evaluated the safety of PSA in the elderly, with conflicting results. Our primary objective was to determine if elderly patients undergoing PSA for the management of an orthopedic injury had an increased risk of adverse events (AEs) during the procedure. Methods: This retrospective review of prospectively recorded data between 2006 and 2016 included patients aged ≥16 years undergoing PSA at a single institution to facilitate treatment of a fracture or dislocation. Patients were separated into 3 age groups for analysis: young (18-40), middle-aged (41-64) and elderly (≥65). Elderly patients were divided into 3 subgroups. The primary AEs studied include hypoxia (SpO2<90 %) and hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg, or >15% reduction from baseline if initial <100 mmHg). Logistic regression (LR) models tested for associations between age and outcome measurements. Effect sizes were described as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. Results: 4171 patients were studied, including 1125 patients ≥65 years of age. More than 90% of the time, propofol was used as a single agent sedative. Fentanyl was given as an analgesic adjunct in 88% of patients. Medication dosing declined as patients aged. In the young group, the average total propofol dose was 2.34 mg/kg compared to 1.42 mg/kg in the elderly (≥85 years subgroup: 1.07 mg/kg). Despite this, hypoxia was more likely to occur in elderly patients (2.3%) compared to younger patients (0.4%). LR models demonstrated that hypoxia was more likely to occur in: the elderly [OR 4.29 (1.58,11.70)], patients with an ASA classification score of 3 or higher [OR 4.71 (1.89,11.70)], and higher dosing of fentanyl in the elderly [OR 2.35 (1.21,4.57)]. Oral or nasal airway, assisted ventilation, and suctioning were required in less than 1% of all patients. Endotracheal intubation was never required. Hypotension was more likely in elderly patients (11.6%) than younger patients (8.3%). Conclusion: When performing PSA, clinicians should be aware of the increased risk of AEs in the elderly, particularly hypoxia, and modify selection, dosing, and administration of the PSA medication(s) appropriately. Future study should examine the intermediate and long-term outcomes of elderly patients following ED PSA.

Introduction: The Geriatric Emergency Management (GEM) model has been developed to facilitate identification of older patients that are at higher risk of functional decline, repeat Emergency Department (ED) visits and future hospitalization. Those identified at risk, are referred for more in-depth evaluation and management in community-based specialized geriatric services. Our objective was to: 1) determine the compliance rate to outpatient evaluation following ED recommendation; and 2) identify barriers and facilitators to attendance. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study at two sites of an academic, tertiary level hospital ED between July and December 2016. We enrolled a convenience sample of ED patients, 65 years and older who were seen by a GEM nurse, referred to outpatient specialized geriatric services and consented to study participation. The GEM nurses conducted targeted geriatric assessments, identifying those who would benefit from further community management. We conducted a chart review and a structured telephone follow-up at 6 weeks. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: A total of 101 patients were prospectively enrolled, with 30.4% of eligible participants declining outpatient referral. Enrolled subjects had a mean age of 83.3 years, 58.4% female and 62.0% cognitively impaired. Reasons for referral to specialized geriatric services included: mobility (86.1%), cognition (57.4%), pain (38.6%), mood (34.7%), medication management (33.6%) and nutrition (30.7%). Outpatient referrals were to: geriatric day hospital (51.5%), geriatric outreach (22.7%), falls clinic (11.8%) and geriatric psychiatry (9.9%). Compliance with follow-up within 6 weeks was 64.4%. Barriers to attendance included: patient did not feel specialized geriatric services was needed (52.6%); admitted to hospital (10.5%); reported not called for appointment (15.8%); forgot appointment (5.3%) and transportation (5.3%). Family support with scheduling and transportation to appointments, reported by 68.6%, was the most common enabler to compliance. Conclusion: Over one third of older ED patients referred by GEM for further specialized geriatric services are non-compliant with their community-based evaluation, while one in four older ED patients decline referral to these evaluations while in the ED. Future work should focus on interventions that promote increased referral acceptance and address barriers to attendance.

Introduction: The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) has been validated internationally to predict adverse outcomes and mortality. Frailty assessments in the Emergency Departments (ED) are challenging to due to a lack of training and time. We studied the use of a tablet-based CFS that used graphics and short descriptors to assist choice of the 9 frailty categories. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of people >65 years seen in the ED of 3 Canadian academic centers. We excluded critically ill patients, and those with significant visual impairment or inability to communicate in English or French. We compared agreement on the tablet-based CFS between 4 categories of assessors: Patients, ED Physicians, trained Research Assistance and Caregivers using the kappa statistic. Results: We enrolled 274/380 eligible patients who provided complete data (72.1%). Their average age was 75.8 years, and 48.9% were female. Their median MOCA score was 23/30 (IQR=17-26) and their median OARS was 26/28 (IQR 22-28). Agreement between physicians and research assistants was good (κ=0.60, 95% CI 0.50-0.70), as was physician-caregiver agreement and patient-caregiver agreement (κ=0.66, 95% CI 0.40-0.93). Agreement between physicians and patients was only moderate (κ=0.47, 95% CI 0.36-0.58). Conclusion: There was less agreement between physicians and patient self-assessments for the CFS compared to physicians-research assistant agreement and care-giver patient assessments of frailty. Future research should validate whether MD, patient, or caregiver rated CFS have higher predictive validity.

Introduction: It remains unclear whether widespread use of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in acute strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) has tangible benefits for patient outcomes or management. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of CTA and patient-important outcomes (recurrent stroke, mortality, disability, and emergency department (ED) revisits) or changes in management in patients presenting with acute stroke or TIA. PROSPERO: 349590 Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Registry were searched through May 24, 2016 for eligible trials. We included observational cohort studies and RCTs evaluating use of CTA against a control group for outcomes of interest in patients presenting acutely with suspected stroke or TIA. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Data for mortality and stroke rate were pooled by the generic inverse variance method and expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Data for disability were reported as the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran’s Q statistic and quantified by the I2 statistic. Overall strength of the evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. Results: Three observational cohort studies involving 979 patients over an average of 1 year follow up met inclusion criteria; there were no eligible RCTs. CTA use in acute stroke or TIA patients was associated with a decreased mortality rate (RR=0.55, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.91, P=0.02; Phet=0.88, I2=0%). No changes were detected in stroke rate (RR=0.84, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.73, P=0.63; Phet=0.79, I2=0%). One study with data for disability showed no changes in mRS (MD=0.01, 95% CI -0.70 to 0.73, P=0.97). There were no eligible studies with data for ED revisits or changes in management. The strength of the evidence was assessed as very low quality due to imprecision for mortality, stroke rate, and disability. Conclusion: CTA use was associated with significantly reduced mortality in acute stroke and TIA patients, possibly due to confounding from poor baseline status of patients not receiving CTA. No significant changes were found for stroke rate or disability. There is a need for RCTs to confirm the effects of CTA use on patient outcomes and management.

Introduction: Most acute asthma presentations to the emergency department (ED) are uncomplicated and do not require chest radiographs (CXR). Evidence suggests that the proportion of acute asthma patients receiving CXRs in the ED is high and varies substantially within and across sites and studies. This study explored CXR ordering and variation in acute asthma presentations to Alberta’s EDs. Methods: Administrative health data for Alberta was obtained from the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) for all adult (>17 years) acute asthma (ICD-10-CA: J45) ED visits from 2011-2015. Patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of asthma were included, provided they had a Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale score of 2-5. NACRS data were linked with Alberta Health Services’ (AHS) diagnostic imaging database. Preliminary analysis on variation in imaging at the zone, ED site, and physician level was completed using SAS (v.9.4). Physicians who saw less than an average of 10 asthma patients per year were excluded. Results: Overall, 51,511 acute asthma ED presentations occurred (~10,000/year). The average proportion of CXRs among presentations was 39.5% (2011-2015) with an average annual increase of 6.7%. From 2011-2015, CXR ordering varied across the five AHS zones (variation [V]: 25%; range: 26.0%-51.0%). Substantial variation was observed across ED sites V: 60%; range: 5.9-66.4%) and physicians (V: 89%; range: 1.4-90.6%). The mean CXR ordering among physicians was 44%. Conclusion: From 2011-2015, CXR use among acute asthma ED presentations has increased. Substantial variation in CXR use suggests that evidence-based interventions are needed to improve imaging appropriateness.

Introduction: Diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) can be challenging because the signs and symptoms are often non-specific. Studies have shown that evidence-based diagnostic algorithms are not always adhered to in the Emergency Department (ED), which leads to unnecessary CT scanning. In 2013, the American College of Chest Physicians identified CT pulmonary angiography as one of the top five avoidable tests. One solution is to use a clinical prediction rule combined with the D-dimer, which safely reduces the use of CT scanning. The objective of this study was to compare the proportion of patients tested for PE in two emergency departments, who 1) had a CT-PE and 2) whose diagnosis of PE was missed. We compared these rates to those if the Wells rule and D-dimer had been applied as standard. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of ED patients investigated for PE at two hospitals from April 2013 to March 2015 (24 months). Inclusion criteria were the ED physician ordered CT-PE, Ventilation-Perfusion (VQ) scan or D-dimer for investigation of PE. Patients under the age of 18 were excluded. PE was defined as CT/VQ diagnosis of acute PE or acute PE/DVT in 30-day follow-up. Trained researchers extracted anonymized data. The rate of CT/VQ imaging and the false-negative rates were calculated. The false-negative rate was calculated as the number of patients diagnosed with PE within 30 days as a proportion of those patients who did not have a CT/VQ scan at initial presentation. Results: There were 1,189 patients included in this study. 55/1,189 patients (4.6%; 95%CI 3.6-6.0%) were ultimately diagnosed with PE within 30 days. 397/1,189 patients (33.4%; 95%CI 30.8-36.1%) had CT/VQ scans for PE. 3 out of 792 who were not scanned had a missed PE resulting in a false-negative rate of 0.4% (95% CI 0.1-1.1%). 80 patients had an elevated D-dimer or high Wells score but were not imaged. Furthermore, 75 patients who did not have an elevated D-dimer nor a high Wells score were imaged. Had Wells rule/D-dimer been adhered to, 402/1,189 patients (33.8%; 95%CI 31.9-36.6%) would have undergone imaging and the false negative rate would be 0/727, 0% (95%CI 0.0-0.5%). Conclusion: If the Wells rule and D-dimer was used in all patients tested for PE, a similar proportion would have a CT scan but fewer PEs would be missed.

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been suggested as an initial investigation in the management of renal colic. Our objectives were: 1) to determine the accuracy of POCUS for the diagnosis of nephrolithiasis, and 2) to assess its prognostic value in the management of renal colic (PROSPERO: 42016035331). Methods: An electronic database search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed was conducted utilizing subject headings, keywords, and synonyms that address our research question. Bibliographies of included studies and narrative reviews were manually examined. Studies of adult emergency department patients with renal colic symptoms were included. Any degree of hydronephrosis was considered a positive POCUS finding. Accepted criterion standards were CT evidence of renal stone or hydronephrosis, direct stone visualization, or surgical findings. Screening of abstracts, quality assessment with the QUADAS-2 instrument, and data extraction were performed by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by conference with a third reviewer.Test performance was assessed by pooled sensitivity and specificity, calculated likelihood ratios, and a summary receiver operator curve (SROC). The secondary outcome of prognostic value was reported as a narrative summary. Results: The electronic search yielded 627 unique titles. After relevance screening, 25 papers underwent full-text review, and 8 articles met all inclusion criteria. Of these, 5 high-quality studies (N=1773) were included in the meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy, and three yielded data on prognostic value. The pooled results for sensitivity and specificity were 70.2% (95% CI=67.1% to 73.2%) and 75.4% (95% CI=72.5% to 78.2%), respectively. The calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios were 2.85 and 0.39. The SROC generated did not show evidence of a threshold effect.Three studies examining prognostic value noted a higher likelihood of a large stone or surgical intervention with positive POCUS findings. The largest randomized trial showed lower cumulative radiation exposure and no increase in adverse events in those who received POCUS investigation as the initial renal colic investigation. Conclusion: Point-of-care ultrasound is of modest accuracy for the diagnosis of nephrolithiasis. While positive POCUS findings are associated with larger stones and greater likelihood for intervention, the clinical importance of this is unclear.

Introduction: Unnecessary imaging of adult cervical spine (C-spine) injury patients in the Emergency Department (ED) is a concern. Guidance for C-spine image ordering exists; however, the effectiveness and safety of their implementation in the ED is not well studied. This review examines their implementation and effectiveness at reducing C-spine imaging in adults presenting to the ED with stable neck trauma. Methods: Six electronic databases and the grey literature were searched. Comparative studies examining interventions to reduce C-spine imaging were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers screened for study eligibility, assessed study quality, and extracted data. Data were analyzed using RevMan (Version 5.3) to explore the effectiveness of these interventions in safely reducing C-Spine radiography. Results: A total of 848 unique citations were screened of which six before-after studies and one randomized controlled trial were included. The study population varied with respect to injury severity (i.e., stability status). None of the studies were assessed as high quality. The interventions employed included locally developed guidelines and clinical decision rules, specifically the National X-radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria and the Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR). Various implementation strategies, such as teaching sessions, pocket reminder cards, posters and computerized decision support were used. Several studies used multi-faceted interventions. Overall, of the five study groups that examined change in x-ray ordering, three groups reported a significant reduction in c-spine radiography. The remaining two showed no change in imaging. A pooled estimate of the effectiveness of the interventions was prohibited by significant heterogeneity. Conclusion: The evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions to reduce C-spine imaging in adult ED patients with stable neck trauma is inconclusive. Given the national and international focus on improving appropriateness and reducing unnecessary imaging through campaigns such as Choosing Wisely®, additional interventional research in this field is warranted.

Introduction: Headaches are a common emergency department (ED) presentation. Evidence demonstrates that computed tomography (CT) imaging varies significantly within and across sites. This study explored CT ordering and variation among headache presentations across Alberta EDs. Methods: Administrative health data for Alberta were obtained from the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) for all adult (>17 years) headache (ICD-10-CA: G44, G43, R51) ED visits from 2011-2015. Patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis code of headache were included. Exclusions were: sites without CT scanners, Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale score of 1, patients with trauma or external mechanism of injury (e.g., ICD-10-CA S,T,V,W,X,Y), or enhanced/contrast CTs. NACRS data were linked with Alberta Health Services’ (AHS) diagnostic imaging data. Preliminary analysis on imaging variation at the zone, ED site, and physician level was completed using SAS (v.9.4). Physicians who saw less than an average of 10 headache patients per year were excluded. Results: Overall, 98,804 headache presentations were recorded (~20,000/year; 8.5% average annual increase) in 30 EDs. The average proportion of visits receiving CT was 25.1% with an average 6.2% increase per year. CT ordering varied across AHS zones (Variation [V]:23%; range:9.6-32.7%). Site ordering variation was more dramatic (V:45%; range:1.4-46.5%). The greatest variation was observed among physicians (V:84 %; range: 0.0-83.7%) with mean ordering proportion of 28.7%. Conclusion: From 2011-2015, headache presentations and CT imaging for these patients in the ED increased. Substantial variation in CT ordering exists at multiple levels in Alberta. Further exploration of CT appropriateness is urgently needed.

Introduction: Computerized tomography for pulmonary embolism (CTPE) has come under increased scrutiny with recommendations for evidence-based use found on Choosing Wisely lists in both Canada and the US. However practice variation in ordering patterns and diagnostic yield have not been well-reported for the Canadian context. Our objective was to investigate practice variation in CTPE ordering and rule-in rates within a large group of specialty-trained emergency physicians. Methods: We undertook an analysis of a computerized physician order entry database from four tertiary care EDs covering a 12-month period from August 1, 2016 to July 30, 2016 with 31 419 visits for potential pulmonary embolism (PE) as determined by a previously validated algorithm based on presenting complaints. CTPE utilization and diagnostic yield were determined for 149 physicians who ordered at least 10 studies over that time period. Outcomes of interest included CT utilization as determined by electronic order entry and a confirmed diagnosis of PE based on ICD-10 coding of the emergency visit. Descriptive statistics using medians, IQR and 95% confidence intervals are reported. This study is approved through REB14-0650 and is a component of a larger cluster RCT to improve CTPE utilization. Results: During the study period 2670 CTPE studies were ordered for potential PE patients representing 8.5% of the total with relevant complaints. We observed a 10-fold variation in CTPE ordering among physicians with rates as low as 2.7% and as high as 25%. The median rate of CTPE ordering for potential PE was 8.8% with an IQR of 6.0% to 11.7%. A total of 4146 CTPE studies were ordered during the study period with physicians ordering an average of 28 CTPE studies each; range 10-90. In terms of diagnostic yield, 591/4146 studies, or 14.3% (95% CI 13.2-15.3%) were associated with a diagnosis of PE. Diagnostic yield per physician ranged from 0 to 50%, with a median of 13.5% and an IQR of 7.6% to 21.4%. Conclusion: In this large, robust administrative dataset from four Canadian urban EDs, threshold for CTPE ordering varies widely among physicians as does diagnostic yield. Efforts to improve appropriate utilization are justified with an eye to reducing unnecessary radiation, costs and incidental findings.