Innovation Concept: Residents bear an enormous burden of responsibility for patient care which can lead to stress and mental exhaustion, especially in the face-paced and acute environment of emergency medicine (EM). In addition to numerous demands faced by EM residents, being a member of a geographically distributive residency program presents many unique challenges from a support and wellness perspective. To address these issues we sought to implement a video conferenced peer support network in hopes to foster wellness in the NOSM Family Medicine/EM program, where learners are commonly separated for training. Methods: Participants completed a pre-pilot questionnaire that strongly showed interest for this type of novel network. Furthermore residents conveyed that they are reluctant to access formal services and commonly rely on co-residents for support. This pilot program intends to decrease barriers that geography and stigma create that negatively hinder seeking support throughout medical training. Keeping the network small, consisting of only co-residents maintains a collegial and confidential environment that enables colleagues to provide relevant help to one another. Offering this outlet allows the opportunity to debrief and share unique experiences, which can lead to improved knowledge and wellbeing. Curriculum, Tool or Material: Informal, co-resident run and easy to access sessions are held twice monthly and average one hour in length. Discussion topics commonly include residency issues, difficult patient encounters and challenging situations. These sessions are conducted via video conferencing making them easily accessible from a distance and also from a comfortable and convenient environment of the participants choosing. Residents have commented that this is a helpful platform to discuss important issues while providing and safe and confidential resource to help cope with residency challenges. Conclusion: Further data analysis is underway as we are in the initial stages of implementing the program. In the final stages (April 2018) a pending post-pilot questionnaire will be interpreted to explore barriers, limitations and to determine the role of the network going forward. If found to be effective it is something that can be implemented and adapted for future residents. Other programs can use this feasible model to increase wellness and foster the same supportive environment among residents, especially those separated geographically from peers who may benefit most.

Introduction: The number of seniors presenting to emergency departments after a fall is increasing. Head injury concerns in this population often leads to a head CT scan. The CT rate among physicians is variable and the reasons for this are unknown. This study examined the role of patient characteristics and country of practice in the decision to order a CT. Methods: This study used a case-based survey of physicians across multiple countries. Each survey included 9 cases pertaining to an 82-year old man who falls. Each case varied in one aspect compared to a base case (aspirin, warfarin, or rivaroxaban use, occipital hematoma, amnesia, dementia, and fall with no head trauma). For each case, participants indicated how “likely” they were to order a head CT scan, measured on a 100-point scale. A response of 80 or more was defined a priori as ‘likely to order a CT scan’. The survey was piloted among emergency residents for feedback on design and comprehension, and was published in French and English. Recruitment was through the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, Twitter and CanadiEM. For each case we compared the proportion of physicians who were ‘likely to scan’ with relative to the base case. We also compared the proportion of participants who were ‘likely to scan’ each case in the USA, UK and Australia, relative to Canada. Results: Data was collected from 484 respondents (Canada-308, USA-64, UK-67, Australia-27, and 18 from other countries). Social media distribution limited our ability to estimate of the response rate. Physicians were most likely to scan in the anticoagulation cases (90% likely to order a scan compared to 36% for the base case (p = <0.001)). Other features associated with increased scans were occipital hematoma (48%), multiple falls (68%), and amnesia (68%) (all p < 0.005). Compared to Canada, US physicians were more likely to order CT scans for all cases (p = <0.05). Compared to Canada, UK physicians were significantly less likely to order CT for patients in every case except in the patient with amnesia. Finally, Australian physicians differed from Canada only for the occipital hematoma case where they were significantly more likely to order CT scan. Conclusion: Anticoagulation, amnesia and a history of multiple falls appear to drive the ordering a head CT scan in elderly patients who had fallen. We observed variations in practice between countries. Future clinical decision rules will likely have variable impact on head CT scan rates depending on baseline practice variation.

Introduction: Insufficient analgesia affects around 50% of emergency department patients. The use of a protocol helps to reduce the risk of oligoanalgesia in this context. Our objective was to describe the feasibility and efficacy of a multimodal analgesia protocol (combining paracetamol, oxycodone, and inhaled low-dose methoxyflurane) initiated by triage nurse. Methods: We performed a prospective, observational study in the emergency department at Grenoble Alpes University Hospital (Grenoble, France) between October 2017 and April 2018. Non severe adult trauma patients with a numerical pain rating scale (NRS) score ≥4 and receiving MEOF were included. The primary efficacy criterion was the proportion of patients with an NRS score ≤3 at 15min post-administration. Pain intensity was measured for 60 min as well as during radiography. Data on adverse events and satisfaction were also recorded. Data are presented as median [interquartile (IQR)] and were compared using non parametric tests. Results: A total of 200 adult patients were included (age: 32 [IQR: 23–49] years; 126 men (63%)). Patients presented at triage with a pain score of 7 [IQR: 6-8]. Sixty-six patients (33%) reported an NRS score ≤3 at 15 min post-administration. The time required to achieve a decrease of at least 2 points in the NRS score was 10 [IQR 5–20] min. The pain intensity was 4 [IQR: 2–5] before radiography and 4 [IQR: 2–6] during radiography. Adverse events were frequent (n = 128, 64%), mainly dizziness. No serious adverse events were reported and 89% of minor adverse events resolved at one hour. Both patients and health care providers reported good levels of satisfaction. Conclusion: The administration of a nurse-driven multimodal analgesia protocol combining paracetamol, oxycodone, and low-dose methoxyflurane was feasible on triage. It rapidly produced long-lasting analgesia in adult trauma patients.

Introduction: Health disparities between racial and ethnic groups have been well documented in Canada, the United States, and Australia. Despite evidence that differences in emergency department (ED) care based on patient race and ethnicity exist, there is a lack of scientific reviews in this important area. The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the literature on the impact of patient race and ethnicity on ED care. Methods: A scoping review guided by the framework described by Arksey and O'Malley was undertaken. This approach was taken because it was best suited to the goal of providing an overview of all of the literature, given the broad nature of the topic. All studies with primary outcomes considering the impact of patient race and ethnicity on “throughput” factors in the ED as defined by Asplin et al., were considered. Outcomes considered included triage scores, wait times, analgesia, diagnostic testing, treatment, leaving without being seen, and patient experiences. Literature from Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand was considered. A database search protocol was developed iteratively as familiarity with the literature developed. Inclusion and exclusion decisions were made using an established model. Results: The original search yielded 1157 citations, reduced to 453 after duplicate removal. 153 full texts were included for screening, of which 85 were included for final data extraction. Results indicate there is evidence that minority racial and ethnic groups experience disparities in triage scores, wait times, analgesia, treatment, diagnostic testing, leaving without being seen, and subjective experiences. Authors’ suggested explanations for these disparities can be placed in the following categories: (1) communication differences; (2) conscious or unconscious bias; (3) facility and resource factors in hospitals with higher minority presentation rates; and (4) differences in clinical presentations. Conclusion: This scoping review provides an overview of the literature on the impacts of race and ethnicity on ED care. As disparities have been shown to exist in numerous contexts, further research on the impact of race and ethnicity in ED care is warranted, especially in the Canadian literature. Such explorations could aid in the informing and creation of policy, and guide practice.

Introduction: Choosing Wisely Canada guidelines suggest that in the absence of red flags or clinical indicators suggestive of serious underlying conditions, physicians should not order radiological images for patients presenting with non-specific low back pain, and current recommendations do not endorse routine prescribing of opioids for this condition. The objective of this study was to determine how many patients presenting to the ED with non-traumatic low back pain have spinal imaging and how many are discharged home on opioids. Methods: We conducted a retrospective medical record review for adult (>17 years) patients presenting to an academic tertiary care ED with non-traumatic low back pain from April 1st 2014 to March 31st 2015 (pre-guideline) and April 1st 2017 to March 31st 2018 (post-guideline). Patients were excluded if they were >70 years old, were not discharged home, had a traumatic injury, features of cauda equina syndrome, weight loss, history of cancer, fever, night sweats, chronic use of systemic corticosteroids, chronic use of illicit intravenous drugs, first episode of low back pain over 50 years of age, abnormal reflexes, loss of motor strength or loss of sensation in the legs. Results: 1060 (545 pre-guideline, 515 post-guideline) were included. Mean (SD) age was 39.6 (12.3) years and 549 (51.8%) were female. Pre-guideline, 45 (8.3%) patients had spinal imaging, compared to 39 (7.6%) post-guideline (Δ 0.7%; 95% CI: −2.6% to 4.0%). Of the 84 (7.9%) patients who had spinal imaging, 4 (8.9%) had pathologic findings pre-guideline, compared to 10 (25.6%) patients post-guideline. The proportion of patients discharged home with a prescription for opioids was lower after the Choosing Wisely Canada guidelines (40.9% vs. 11.1%; Δ29.8%; 95% CI: 24.8% to 34.7%). Conclusion: Choosing Wisely Canada guidelines did not appear to alter the rate of imaging for patients presenting to the ED with non-traumatic low back pain. Overall the rate of spinal imaging was lower than expected. The proportion of patients who were discharged home with a prescription for opioids was lower after the Choosing Wisely Canada guidelines, however we don't know if this represents an overall trend in the reduction of opioid prescribing, or a specific change in practice related to the ED management of low back pain.

Introduction: Little is known about the variety of roles volunteers play in the emergency department (ED), and the potential impact they have on patient experience. The objective of this scoping review was to identify published and unpublished reports that described volunteer programs in EDs, and determine how these programs impacted patient experiences or outcomes. Methods: Electronic searches of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CINAHL were conducted and reference lists were hand-searched. A grey literature search was also conducted (Web of Science, ProQuest, Canadian Business and Current Affairs Database ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global). Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, reviewed full text articles, and extracted data. Results: The search strategy yielded 4,589 potentially relevant citations. After eliminating duplicate citations and articles that did not meet eligibility criteria, 87 reports were included in the review. Of the included reports, 18 were peer-reviewed articles, 6 were conference proceedings, 59 were magazine or newspaper articles, and 4 were graduate dissertations or theses. Volunteer activities were categorized as non-clinical tasks (e.g., provision of meals/snacks, comfort items and mobility assistance), navigation, emotional support/communication, and administrative duties. 52 (59.8%) programs had general volunteers in the ED and 35 (40.2%) had volunteers targeting a specific patient population, including pediatrics, geriatrics, patients with mental health and addiction issues and other vulnerable populations. 20 (23.0%) programs included an evaluative component describing how ED volunteers affected patient experiences and outcomes. Patient satisfaction, follow-up and referral rates, ED and hospital costs and length of stay, subsequent ED visits, medical complications, and malnutrition in the hospital were all reported to be positively affected by volunteers in the ED. Conclusion: This scoping review demonstrates the important role volunteers play in enhancing patient and caregiver experience in the ED. Future volunteer engagement programs implemented in the ED should be formally described and evaluated to share their success and experience with others interested in implementing similar programs in the ED.

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) care allows for the rapid assessment of patient concerns, but often leads to tests being performed that are not finalized or reviewed prior to patients leaving the ED. The follow-up for these tests pending at discharge (TPADs), most commonly final diagnostic imaging (DI) reports and microbiology cultures, is a major medico-legal concern for ED providers and significant safety concern for patients. We therefore performed a systematic review of the literature to identify existing ED quality assurance (QA) processes to address TPADs relating to final DI reports and microbiology cultures. Methods: Comprehensive literature searches were developed with a medical librarian and conducted in Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL from inception through May 8, 2018. Studies were included if they described an intervention or program designed to follow-up relevant ED TPADs, and excluded if they pertained to communication between departments or clinicians only rather than with patients. Study selection was performed independently by two reviewers in two steps (title and abstract review, then full-text review), with all discrepancies resolved by consensus with a senior reviewer. The primary outcome was the description of any QA process to follow-up on TPADs and secondary outcomes included quantifiable results of successful interventions or programs. Results: From the 11,685 articles identified, 58 were selected for full-text review, and 12 met eligibility criteria. In the included studies, the responsibility for following up on TPADs was owned by different members of the care team (e.g., ED physicians, nurses or radiologists) and recorded in a variety of ways (e.g., electronic medical record, paper chart, system designed for TPADs). Follow-up pathways with variable standardization were described, ranging from dedicated assignment for TPAD duties with protected/remunerated time to do so, to follow-up completion done by the first clinician to receive the TPAD result. Studies that evaluated their QA process implementation found that more patients were notified of abnormal test results, follow-up times decreased, and fewer unnecessary antibiotics were used. Conclusion: A variety of QA processes have been implemented to follow up on ED TPADs in terms of personnel involved, charting and logistics, and when evaluated, they have improved patient care.

Introduction: The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) identifies the level of urgency when patients arrive to the Emergency department (ED). Sepsis is challenging to recognize and is associated with significant mortality (30 to 50%). The integration of the COP criteria allows for earlier detection and management of sepsis.The CTAS's validity and reliability are debated. The NEWS score has been suggested to allow a timely recognition of sepsis.Objectives:To describe patient orientation at ED triage with the NEWS vs. the CTAS and COP criteria and to identify the NEWS's ability to detect patients who will require admission to critical care. Methods: Design: A retrospective cohort study of ED 225 patients (January-November 2018) is was constituted. Participants: Patients were included if they were aged ≥18, consulting to the ED, presented one of the 32 diagnoses included in the CMI-10. Measurements: Retained variables are sex, age, CTAS score and level of care. The NEWS score was calculated from triage vital signs. Main outcome was Patient orientation after ED triage using CTAS vs the NEWS score. Descriptive statistics to determine patient orientation based on the NEWS and CTAS were performed. Fisher tests (α = 0.05) were used to assess a possible association between both triage scales and identify the NEWS's ability to detect patients who will require admission to critical care during. Sample size was calculated in order to detect a 15% difference between actual orientation and theoretical orientation based on the NEWS. Results: The retained cohort (45% men) were aged 66 ± 21 years. 67% were admitted, 14% of which to a critical care unit. Average length of hospital stay was 6.3 ± 7.8 days. Primary objective: patient orientation after triage using CTAS vs the NEWS was: 29% vs. 18% for high risk patients; 2% vs. 67% for low risk patients (p < 0.0001), respectively. Secondary objective: Among patients with stable NEWS score, 53% were admitted to hospital among patients with medium NEWS score, 9% of patients were admitted to the critical care (p = 0.0003) Conclusion: Patient orientation after ED triage using CTAS vs the NEWS is significantly different. The NEWS alone does not seem to be able to detect patients who will require admission to critical care. Future studies exploring an aggregate scoring system combining the NEWS and CTAS could be performed to determine if sepsis recognition and patient orientation can be improved

Introduction: Effective communication to develop a shared understanding of patient/caregiver (P/C) expectations is critical during emergency department (ED) encounters. However, there is limited research examining the use of communication tools of P/C expectations to improve communication in the ED. The objective of this study was to examine satisfaction with a patient expectations questionnaire, known as the PrEPP tool, and its impact on communication and management of patients in the ED. Methods: The PrEPP tool collected P/C expectations over 3 phases of the study. In phase1, the PrEPP tool was distributed to all P/Cs (CTAS score of 2 to 5) in four EDs in Nova Scotia. In phase 2 the PrEPP tool was refined to a 5-item questionnaire. In phase 3 the PrEPP tool was re-implemented over a six-month period. Follow-up surveys were distributed to P/Cs via email (phase 1, 3) and HCPs on iPads in the ED (phase 3) to determine the impact of the tool on communication and management of patients. Entries were compiled on a REDCap database and descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses related to satisfaction.The PrEPP tool collected P/C expectations over 3 phases of the study. In phase1, the PrEPP tool was distributed to all P/Cs (CTAS score of 2 to 5) in four EDs in Nova Scotia. In phase 2 the PrEPP tool was refined to a 5-item questionnaire. In phase 3 the PrEPP tool was re-implemented over a six-month period. Follow-up surveys were distributed to P/Cs via email (phase 1, 3) and HCPs on iPads in the ED (phase 3) to determine the impact of the tool on communication and management of patients. Entries were compiled on a REDCap database and descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses related to satisfaction. Results: In Phase 1, 11418 PrEPP tools and 147 surveys (29% response rate) were collected from January-June 2016. The majority of P/Cs found the PrEPP questionnaire easy to complete (95.9%) and felt HCPs met their expectations (87.1%). In Phase 3, 951 P/C (31.1% response rate) and 128 HCP surveys were collected. Of P/C respondents 45.9% felt PrEPP helped to communicate expectations, while 49.7% said that they would like to use it on future ED visits. The majority of P/C respondents (75.4%) indicated their expectations were met during their visit to the ED. Of those whose expectations were not met, 69% felt their expectations were not discussed. The majority of HCP respondents (90.4%) indicated they used the PrEPP tool at least sometimes. Also, 78.4% said it influenced patient communication and 42% indicated the tool influenced management of patients at least sometimes. Conclusion: Obtaining expectations early in the patient encounter may provide opportunities for improved communication in the ED. P/Cs found the PrEPP tool easy to use to communicate their expectations and HCPs felt it influenced communication and management of patients in the ED. Further qualitative thematic analysis is needed to explore how the PrEPP tool impacted ED visits.

Introduction: The RAPID RIP clinical decision aid was developed to identify patients at high-risk for acute aortic syndrome (AAS) who require investigations. It stratifies patients into low (no further testing) intermediate (D-dimer if no alternative diagnosis) and High risk (Computed tomography (CT) aorta). Our objectives were to assess its impact on: a) Documentation of high risk features/pre test probability for AAS b) D-dimers ordered c) CT ordered and d) Emergency department length of stay. Methods: We conducted a prospective pilot before/after study at a single tertiary-care emergency department between August and September 2018. Consecutive alert adults with chest, abdominal, flank, back pain or stroke like symptoms were included. Patients with pain >14 days or secondary to trauma were excluded. Results: We enrolled 1,340 patients, 656 before and 684 after implementation, including 0 AAS. Documentation of pre test probability assessment increased (0% to 3%, p < 0.009) after implementation. The proportion who had D-dimer performed increased (5.8% to 9.2% (p < 0.2), while the number of CT to rule out AAS remained stable (0.59% versus 0.58%; p = 0.60). The mean length of ED stay was stable (2.31+/−2.0 to 2.28+/−1.5 hours; p = 0.45) and slightly decreased in those with pre test probability documented (2.1+/−1.4 p < 0.09). The specificity of the decision aid for CT was 100%( 95%CI 71.5- 100%). If it were applied to all patients with high-risk clinical features of AAS the specificity would be 92.6% (95%CI 90.1-94.6%). Conclusion: Implementation of the RAPID RIP increased documentation of important high-risk features for AAS. The RAPID RIP strategy increased use of D-dimer without increasing the number of CT and had a trend towards decreased length of stay.

Introduction: Patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) and opioid-use disorders make up a category of patients who present a challenge to emergency department (ED) providers and healthcare administrators. Their conditions predispose them to frequent ED utilization. This problem has been compounded by a worsening opioid epidemic that has rendered clinicians apprehensive about how they approach pain care. A systematic review has not yet been performed to inform the management of CNCP patients in the ED. As such, the purpose of this project was to identify and describe the effectiveness of interventions to reduce ED visits for high-utilizers with CNCP. Methods: Included participants were high-utilizers presenting with CNCP. All study designs were eligible for inclusion if they examined an intervention aimed at reducing ED utilization. The outcomes of interest were the number of ED visits as well as the amount and type of opioids prescribed in the ED and after discharge. We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the grey literature from inception to June 16, 2018. Two independent investigators assessed articles for inclusion following PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tools for non-randomized and randomized trials, respectively. Results: Following review, 14 of the 5,018 identified articles were included for analysis. These articles assessed a total of 1,670 patients from both urban and rural settings. Interventions included pain protocols or policies (n = 5), individualized care plans (n = 5), ED care coordination (n = 2), a chronic pain management pathway (n = 1), and a behavioural health intervention (n = 1). Intervention effects trended towards the reduction of both ED visits and opioid prescriptions. The meta-analysis is in progress. Conclusion: Preliminary results suggest that interventions aimed at high-utilizers with CNCP can reduce ED visits and ED opioid prescription. ED opioid-restriction policies that sought to disincentivize drug-related ED visits were most successful, especially when accompanied by an electronic medical record (EMR) alert to ensure consistent application of the policy by all clinicians and administrators involved in the care of these patients. This review was limited by inconsistencies in the definition of ‘high-utilizer’ and by the lack of high-powered randomized studies.

Introduction: Influenza is a preventable infectious disease that causes a yearly burden to Canada. While an influenza vaccine is available free of charge in most provinces, uptake is below target rates. 15% of Canadians who did not get the influenza vaccine reported that they “didn't get around to it”; this presents an opportunity to combine the task of influenza prevention with the logistical issue of another health system challenge: escalating emergency department (ED) wait times. At the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre (QEII) in Halifax, NS, average wait time is 4.6 hours. Offering the influenza vaccine during this time could increase convenient access to health services, and ultimately, improve vaccination rates. Methods: This observational, cross-sectional design study is currently in progress. It aims to gauge public interest, health care provider (HCP) support, perceived barriers and perceived facilitators to influenza vaccine availability at the QEII ED. Data is being collected via short, anonymous, close-ended questionnaires over a 7-week period, set to end Dec 14, 2018. Client participants are a convenience sample of low-acuity (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale score 4/5), adult clients who use the QEII ED during the study period, anticipated n = 150. Client questionnaires are completed, with the help of a research assistant, on an iPad that inputs data directly into a secure online data collection tool. The HCP group is a convenience sample of nurses, physicians and paramedics currently working in the QEII ED, anticipated n = 80. Questionnaires are available to HCPs either on paper outside the staff lounge, or online. Data is being collected via short, anonymous, close-ended questionnaires over a 7-week period, set to end Dec 14, 2018. Client participants are a convenience sample of low-acuity (Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale score 4/5), adult clients who use the QEII ED during the study period, anticipated n = 150. Client questionnaires are completed, with the help of a research assistant, on an iPad that inputs data directly into a secure online data collection tool. The HCP group is a convenience sample of nurses, physicians and paramedics currently working in the QEII ED, anticipated n = 80. Questionnaires are available to HCPs either on paper outside the staff lounge, or online. Results: Following completion of data collection, descriptive statistics, such as the frequency of support for ED influenza vaccination and the proportion of unvaccinated clients willing to receive the vaccine if available in the ED, will be calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics 25. This will provide meaningful data that can be used by the QEII to inform future program planning (i.e. should the influenza vaccine be made available in the ED). Conclusion: An ED vaccination program could add value to the hours clients spend waiting to be seen, and make ED care more cohesive. It is essential that clients and ED staff are approached prior to any new initiative; this study is one way we can lay the necessary groundwork for a public health program that would utilize patient “wait time” more effectively.

Introduction: Residency training takes place in a work-place learning environment. Residents may work with several supervisors over the course of their training and each will provide feedback and assessments to them. Each supervisor may have a different approach to the delivery of their feedback and may deliver different assessments for the same quality of performance. Research question: among residents who receive regular feedback how do different styles of feedback by supervisors impact the residents’ learning? Methods: A qualitative methodology was used. Participants were residents from residency programs that have routine one-on-one feedback and assessment. In depth, semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted by the primary investigator (PI). These were then transcribed, reviewed and coded. The participants were University of Toronto and McMaster University residents. Sample size will be determined by thematic saturation and data collection is ongoing. The interview guide was updated in an iterative fashion to further explore themes generated in the initial interviews. Interview transcripts will be reviewed and coded by the PI with assistance from collaborators with qualitative methodological expertise. Results: Analysis of the first six participants revealed five themes. Residents described remembering feedback that generated a strong emotional response, both positive and negative; reflection on feedback as a component of using it for learning was consistent; issues with reconciling feedback received that was in conflict with previously feedback; relationship with the individual providing the feedback impacted feedback interpretation; feedback was parsed by residents to determine the rationale of the assessor and whether to incorporate feedback into learning process. Conclusion: How residents use feedback to further their learning is variable. This study identifies that styles of feedback, emotional response and relationship with the provider are all contributors to the learning that occurs after a feedback encounter. It also identifies that residents reflect on feedback differently and make decisions about how to incorporate feedback into their learning and practice. The individuality of these responses to feedback are important for trainee self-reflection in furthering their learning as well as important in faculty development as they develop skills in assessment and feedback. It is also important for training programs that facilitate the trainee supervisor interactions.

Introduction: Efficient multidisciplinary team dynamics are crucial to the provision of optimal ED care. Physicians and nurses must use a collaborative approach to meet patient needs in this busy setting. This is especially important for high-acuity low-occurrence (HALO) procedures and clinical encounters. Simulation provides a safe environment where learning is enhanced through deliberate practice. Multidisciplinary participation in simulation-based education may augment team cohesiveness and performance. Methods: A web-based needs assessment survey was distributed to ED nurses, collecting information on demographics, opinions about simulation-based instruction and perceptions on the value of the proposed collaborative educational approach of the project. Experience and comfort with nursing roles in specific procedures (TV pacer, surgical airway, chest tube, central line, sedation) and clinical encounters (STEMI, CVA, sepsis, anaphylaxis, GI bleed) seen in the ED were also assessed. There were a number of suggestions for topics in addition to those listed. Responses will guide the collaborative development of simulation modules with nursing colleagues on desired topics. Results: 58/97 potential nurse participants from 2 urban ED's responded to the survey over an 8-week period, giving a response rate of 58.8%. 76% of respondents had less than 10 years of ED nursing experience, and 34.48% less than 5 years. Responses indicate limited familiarity with simulation-based education (SBE) on ED scenarios with 33.93% being not familiar; 55.36% somewhat familiar. Most prior simulation experience was with role-playing (82%) or low-fidelity setups (42%). Perceived benefit of SBE sessions was substantial (43.86%- very significant; 45.61%- significant). Most respondents had limited past exposure (22.81%- none; 64.91%- 1-5 sims). Similarly, there was little ongoing participation in SBE events with none in 43.64% and 40% just annually. For the 5 clinical scenarios, average responses were: Comfort with assisting 87.45%; Interest in further training 91.43%; Willingness to participate 94.13%. For the 5 procedures, averages were 36.35% (21.36% excluding sedation), 91.27%, 89.09%, respectively. Conclusion: Results indicate a low level of familiarity, experience and ongoing exposure with SBE relating to ED training and practice. Participants recognize the potential benefits of using simulation in a multidisciplinary educational setting and indicate a willingness to participate in collaborative teaching sessions.

Innovation Concept: Competence by Design (CBD) was implemented nationally for Emergency Medicine (EM) residents beginning training in 2018. One challenge is the need to introduce residents to Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) that are assessed across numerous clinical rotations. The Royal College's resources detail these requirements, but do not map them to specific rotations or present them in a succinct format. This is problematic as trainees are less likely to succeed when expectations are unclear. We identified a need to create practical resources that residents can use at the bedside. Methods: We followed an intervention mapping framework to design two practical, user-friendly, low-cost, aesthetically pleasing resources that could be used by residents and observers at the bedside to facilitate competency-based assessment. Curriculum, Tool or Material: First, we designed a set of rotation- and stage-specific EPA reference cards for the use of residents and observers at the bedside. These cards list EPAs and clinical presentations likely to be encountered during various stages of training and on certain rotations. Second, we developed a curriculum board to organize the EPA reference cards by stage based upon our program's curriculum map. The curriculum board allows residents to view the program's curriculum map and the EPAs associated with each clinical rotation at a glance. It also contains hooks to hang and store extra cards in an organized manner. Conclusion: We believe that these practical and inexpensive tools facilitated our residency program's transition to competency-based EPA assessments. Anecdotally, the residents are using the cards and completing the suggested rotation-specific EPAs. We hope that the reference cards and curriculum board will be successfully incorporated into other residency programs to facilitate the introduction of their EPA-based CBD assessment system.

Introduction: Intranasal ketamine (INK) has an emerging role for procedural sedation (PSA) in children in the emergency department (ED). While INK is less invasive and requires fewer personnel than IV ketamine, widespread adoption in the paediatric ED would require strong nursing acceptance. To inform INK implementation strategies, we explored nursing perspectives surrounding INK, including perceived barriers to its adoption. Methods: Nurses in the paediatric ED of London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario were recruited by email. Two, one-hour, in-person focus groups were conducted on January 26 and February 2, 2018 using a semi-structured interview format. Transcription was performed by a professional medical transcription service and analyzed using an inductive qualitative approach involving code words corresponding to recurring topics. Thematic analysis was used to group similar codes into themes. The analytic process was managed using the NVivo 11 software package. Results: Results: Eight nurses participated. All nurses were female and had a mean of 8.9 (range: 2.5 - 26) years of pediatric emergency nursing experience. Seven nurses had experience monitoring and administering INK to children for PSA. Five themes emerged: 1) attributes of INK, 2) INK effects on patients and families, 3) INK effects on health care providers, 4) INK effects on the ED environment, and 5) uncertainty regarding INK's effectiveness, predictability, and fit into institutional sedation protocols. Subthemes included 1) perceptions that INK produced a relatively shallower, slower-onset, and/or less titratable sedation, 2) the importance of patient cooperation (i.e. INK may be preferred by providers for older patients undergoing relatively painful or long procedures), 3) belief that INK was an effective anxiolytic and sedative with the potential to improve nursing resource utilization, and 4) belief that physician resistance to change and lack of personal familiarity were barriers to adoption. Conclusion: Conclusions: We identified clinical advantages to using INK in children, the importance of selecting appropriate patients, and barriers to widespread INK adoption. Importantly, our findings highlighted uncertainty about INK's effectiveness and incorporation into sedation protocols. Our findings will inform future knowledge translation strategies when implementing INK in the clinical setting.

Introduction: Timely access to definitive care has been associated with improved outcomes for injured patients. Air ambulance services have become an integral part of Canadian trauma systems to help provide earlier access to a lead trauma centre (LTC). Multiple factors can lead to non-optimal resource utilization resulting in potential transport delays. The goal of this study is to identify patient, institutional and paramedic risk factors for non-optimal resource utilization for interfacility transfers of injured adult patients transported by air ambulance to a LTC. Methods: Ornge is a paramedic-staffed organization that is the sole provider of air ambulance services from a non-trauma centre to a LTC for the province of Ontario, Canada. This is a retrospective cohort study of all Ornge adult emergent interfacility transports over a 5-year period. Data was collected on patient demographics and clinical status, sending facilities, transport details and paramedic qualifications. Optimal resource utilization was determined based on distance and historical times. A logistic regression model was used to explore patient, provider and institutional risk factors for non-optimal resource use. Results: Between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017 a total of 1777 injured patients underwent interfacility transport with Ornge. Of these 805 were identified as having non-optimal resource utilization. Patients who had an optimal resource use were found to be older and mechanically ventilated. Risk factors increasing odds of non-optimal transport included patients transported from a nursing station (OR 1.94), transport with primary or advanced care paramedics (OR 6.57 and 1.44, respectively) and transport between both 0800-1700 and 1700-0000 (OR 1.40 and 1.54, respectively). The median delay to arrival to receiving facility if a patient had a non-optimal resource use was 40 minutes Conclusion: We were able to identify several factors resulting in non-optimal resource utilization. We believe that nursing stations as a sending facility and type of paramedics crew transporting patients resulted in non-optimal resource utilization mainly due to these patients being of lower acuity and this affecting their triage. However the timing of day is more likely to be a resource availability issue and something that can be further studied and potentially improved.

Introduction: Trauma is a common cause of mortality across all age groups and is projected to become the third greatest contributor to global disease burden. Recent studies have demonstrated that survival from traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is more favourable than once believed and further research on this population is being encouraged. Currently, it is unclear whether existing databases, such as the National Ambulatory Care Reporting system (NACRS), which includes all emergency department visits, could be used to identify TCAs for population-based studies. We aimed to determine the accuracy of NACRS administrative codes in identifying TCA patients. Methods: This retrospective validation study used data acquired from NACRS and our institutional Patient Care System. We identified a number of International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD-10) diagnostic, procedural and cause of injury codes that we hypothesized would be consistent with TCA. NACRS was subsequently searched for patients meeting the diagnostic code criteria (January 1 - December 31, 2015). The following inclusion criteria were: an eligible ICD-10 diagnostic code or a qualifying Canadian Classification of Health Interventions (CCI) procedure code and an eligible ICD-10 external cause of injury code. Electronic medical records for these patients were then reviewed to determine whether true TCAs had occurred. Results: Eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria and one was excluded from analysis due to inaccessible health records, leaving 84 patients eligible for chart review. Overall, 55% (n = 46) of patients were found to have true TCA, 35% (n = 29) sustained a cardiac arrest of non-traumatic etiology and 11% (n = 9) were considered “unclear” (i.e. could not determine whether it was a true TCA based on the medical records). We found that true TCA patients were most accurately identified using a combination of ICD-10 CA cardiac arrest and external cause of injury codes (Positive predictive value: 70.6%, 95% CI 46.9-86.7). Conclusion: TCA patients were identified with moderate accuracy using the NACRS database. Further efforts to integrate specific data fields for TCA cases within existing population databases and trauma registries is necessary to facilitate future studies focused on this patient population.

Introduction: The literature reveals that residents spend significant amounts of time working with and charting in electronic medical records (EMR). As adoption of EMRs accelerates among emergency medicine (EM) departments, postgraduate programs will need to adapt curricula related to communication in the patient record. In order to make targeted changes, clinician-educators need a better understanding of how the documentation practices of trainees develop and change over residency, as well as the challenges they face in effectively charting. We gathered the perspectives of EM residents on data entry in the EMR to identify opportunities for such change. Methods: We recruited residents from all five years of the Royal College EM residency program at Queen's University and conducted focus groups from August to October 2018. Data collection was audio recorded and later transcribed. Line-by-line coding was performed independently by both AR and NP. A final codebook was validated by ZH. The codebook was then thematically analyzed to identify and characterize themes from the data. The study was approved by the Queen's University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board. Results: 15 EM residents participated. Groups discussed similar challenges with charting, including time constraints, ensuring sufficient, but appropriate detail, variable preceptor expectations, and an inability to draw diagrams. All residents noted formal teaching of the SOAP note framework during medical school and reported receiving an introductory EMR session. Groups highlighted the importance of feedback, especially from physicians with medicolegal experience. They also described more informal learning strategies, including receiving tips from preceptors during shifts and reading the notes of others. They also reported that changes in their documentation practices as junior and senior residents were largely due to a graduation of responsibility and medicolegal considerations. Conclusion: Our results suggest there is a lack of formal postgraduate training for EM residents with respect to documentation in the EMR with reliance on informal teaching and feedback. Future work should explore opportunities to address this gap with various educational strategies, including the development of specific objectives, application of consistent expectations, modelling of excellent chart notes in teaching, and instruction by preceptors with medicolegal experience.

Introduction: Dizziness is a common presentation in emergency departments (ED), accounting for 2-3% of all visits. The HINTS (Head impulse test, Nystagmus, Test of skew) exam has been proposed as a accurate test to help differentiate central from peripheral causes of vertigo. It is only applicable to patients presenting with acute vestibular syndrome (acute onset dizziness or vertigo, ataxia, nystagmus, nausea and/or vomiting, and head motion intolerance). We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of HINTS in detecting central causes of dizziness and vertigo in adult patients presenting with AVS. Methods: We performed a medical records review of all patients with a presenting complaint of dizziness to a tertiary care ED between Sep 2014 and Mar 2018. We excluding those with symptoms >14days, recent trauma, GCS <15, hypotensive, or syncope/loss of consciousness. Data were extracted by 5 trained reviewers using a standardized data collection sheet. Individual patient data were linked with the Institute of Clinical Evaluation Science (ICES) database to assess for any patients with a missed central cause. The primary outcome measure was a central cause of dizziness; cardiovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), brain tumour (BT) or multiple sclerosis (MS) as diagnosed on either computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, neurology consult or diagnostic codes within ICES. Results: 3109 patients were identified and 2309 patients met the inclusion criteria, of those 450 patients (44% male) were assessed using HINTS exam. Of those examined with HINTS, 7 patients (1.6% - 4 CVA 2 TIA 1 MS) were determined to have a central cause for their dizziness. HINTS had a sensitivity of 28.6% (95%CI 3.7 – 71%), specificity 95% (95%CI 92.6-96.9%). Of the individuals assessed with HINTS, only 16 presented with AVS (3.6%), of which three patients were found to have a central cause (CVA 2, TIA 1). HINTS in AVS for all central causes is 66.7% (95%CI 9.4-99.2%)sensitive but is 100%(95%CI 15.8-100%) for CVA alone (excluding TIA). Only 38%(16/42) of patients presenting with AVS were assessed using the HINTS exam. Conclusion: The current use of HINTS is inaccurate and it is used inappropriately in a large number of patients. Future studies should focus on the correct implementation of HINTS in the ED only in patients presenting with AVS.