Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:43:54.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Public access defibrillation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Christian Vaillancourt*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital, – Civic Campus, Ottawa, Ont

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters • Courrier
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2002

References

1.Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians Public Access Defibrillation Working Group. Public access defibrillation programs [position statement]. CJEM 2001;3(4):2678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Communiqué submitted to The Standing Committee on Justice and Social Policy, Ottawa, Aug 30, 2001. Available: www.ontla.on.ca/hansard/committee_debates/37/parl/Session2/justice/J009.htm#P595_138991 (accessed 2001 Dec 14).Google Scholar
3.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Field, BJ, Spaite, DW, De Maio, VJ, Ward, R, et al. Improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival through the inexpensive optimization of an existing defibrillation program: OPALS study phase II. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support. JAMA 1999;281:117581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.De Maio, V, Stiell, I, Wells, G, Martin, MT, Doherty, J, Spaite, DW, et al. Potential impact of public access defibrillation based upon cardiac arrest locations [abstract]. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:4156.Google Scholar
5.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, DeMaio, VJ, et al. Modifiable factors associated with improved cardiac arrest survival in a multicenter basic life support/defibrillation system: OPALS Study Phase I results. Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:4450.Google Scholar
6.De Maio, VJ, Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Martin, MT, Spaite, DW, Nichols, G, et al, for the OPALS Study Group. The relationship between out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival and community bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation rates [abstract]. CJEM 2001;3(2):128.Google Scholar