Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:30:13.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management and outcomes of pediatric patients transported by emergency medical services in a Canadian prehospital system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Julie Richard ,
Martin H. Osmond ,
Lisa Nesbitt  and
Ian G. Stiell
Julie Richard
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Martin H. Osmond*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
Lisa Nesbitt
Affiliation:
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.
Ian G. Stiell
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont. Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ont.
*
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Rd., Ottawa ON K1H 8L1

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives:

There is uncertainty around the types of interventions that are provided by emergency medical services (EMS) to children during prehospital transport. We describe the patient characteristics, events, interventions provided and outcomes of a cohort of children transported by EMS.

Methods:

This prospective cohort study was conducted in a city of 750 000 people with a 2-tiered EMS system. All children <16 years of age who were attended by EMS during a 6-month period were enrolled. Data were extracted from ambulance call reports and hospital charts, and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results:

During the study period there were 1377 pediatric EMS calls. Mean age was 8.2 years (standard deviation 5.4), and the most common diagnoses were trauma (44.9%), seizure (11.8%) and respiratory distress (8.8%). The ambulance return code was Urgent in 7%, Prompt in 57%, Deferrable in 8% and Not Transported in 28%. Fifty-six percent received either an Advanced Life Support or Basic Life Support prehospital intervention. Common procedures included cardiac monitoring (20.0%), oxygen administration (19.8%), blood glucose monitoring (16.3%), spine board (12.2%), limb immobilization (11.1%) and cervical collar (10.0%). Uncommon procedures included administering medications intravenously (IV) (1.4%), bag-valve-mask ventilation (0.3%) and endotracheal intubation (0.1%). Seventy-eight percent of attempted IV lines were successful. Only 9.0% of EMS-transported children were admitted to hospital, and 2.2% were admitted to the intensive care unit.

Conclusions:

This first study of Canadian pediatric prehospital interventions shows a high rate of non-transport, and a low rate of Urgent transports and hospital admissions for children. Very few children receive prehospital airway management, ventilation or IV medications; consequently EMS personnel have little opportunity to maintain these pediatric skills in the field.

Keywords

childrenemergency medical servicesadvanced life support interventionsbasic life support interventions
Type
Original Research • Recherche originale
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 6 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2006

References

1.Seidel, JS, Hornbein, M, Yoshiyama, K, et al. Emergency medical services and the pediatric patient: Are the needs being met? Pediatrics 1984;73:769–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Tsai, A, Kallsen, G.Epidemiology of pediatric prehospital care. Ann Emerg Med 1987;16:284–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.McCaig, LF, Ly, N.National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2000 Emergency Department Summary. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics; no. 326. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2002.Google Scholar
4.Joyce, SM, Brown, DE, Nelson, EA.Epidemiology of pediatric EMS practice: a multistate analysis. Prehospital Disaster Med 1996;11:180–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Yamamoto, LG, Wiebe, RA, Maiava, DM, et al. A one-year series of pediatric prehospital care: I. Ambulance runs; II. Prehospital communication; III. Interhospital transport services. Pediatr Emerg Care 1991;7:206–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Seidel, JS, Henderson, DP, Ward, P, et al. Pediatric prehospital care in urban and rural areas. Pediatrics 1991;88:681–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Svenson, JE, Nypaver, M, Calhoun, R.Pediatric prehospital care: epidemiology of use in a predominantly rural state. Pediatr Emerg Care 1996;12:173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Reisdorff, EJ, Howell, KA, Saul, J, et al. Prehospital interventions in children. Prehosp Emerg Care 1998;2:180–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Murdock, TC, Knapp, JF, Dowd, MD, et al. Bridging the emergency medical services for children information gap. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:281–5.Google Scholar
10.Sapien, RE, Fullerton, L, Olson, LM, et al. Disturbing trends: the epidemiology of pediatric emergency medical services use. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6:232–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Suruda, A, Vernon, DD, Reading, J, et al. Pre-hospital emergency medical services: a population based study of pediatric utilization. Inj Prev 1999;5:294–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Rosenberg, N, Knazik, S, Cohen, S, et al. Use of Emergency Medical Service transport system in medical patients up to 36 months of age. Pediatr Emerg Care 1998;14:191–3.Google ScholarPubMed
13.Brady, WJ, Hennes, H, Wolf, A, et al. Pattern of basic life support ambulance use in an urban pediatric population. Am J Emerg Med 1996;14:250–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Kost, S, Arruda, J.Appropriateness of ambulance transportation to a suburban emergency department. Prehosp Emerg Care 1999;3:187–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Camasso-Richardson, K, Wilde, JA, Petrack, EM.Medically unnecessary pediatric ambulance transports: A medical taxi service? Acad Emerg Med 1997;4:1137–41.Google Scholar
16.Scribano, PV, Baker, MD, Holmes, J, et al. Use of out-of-hospital interventions for the pediatric patient in an urban emergency medical services system. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:745–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Sapien, RE.Lapidus, J.Coors, L.Murphy, SJ.Prehospital EMS treatment of pediatric asthma and what happens before help arrives? J Asthma 1997;34:477–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Kost, S, Cronan, K, Gorelick, M, et al. Ambulance use by high-acuity patients in a pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18:679–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Spaite, DW, et al. The Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support (OPALS) Study: rationale and methodology for cardiac arrest patients. Ann Emerg Med 1998;32:180–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Field, BJ, et al.; OPALS Study Group. Improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival through the inexpensive optimization of an existing defibrillation program (OPALS Study Phase II). JAMA 1999;281:1175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Field, B, et al.; OPALS Study Group. Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. N Engl J Med 2004;351:647–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Gausche, M, Seidel, JS.Out-of hospital care of pediatric patients. Pediatr Clin North Am 1999;46:1305–27.Google Scholar
23.Goldberg, RJ, Zautcke, Jl, Koenigsberg, MD, et al. A review of prehospital care litigation in a large metropolitan EMS system. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:557–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Soler, JM, Montes, MF, Egol, AB, et al. The 10-year malpractice experience of a large urban EMS system. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:982–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Babl, FE, Vinci, RJ, Bauchner, H, et al. Pediatric pre-hospital advanced life support care in an urban setting. Pediatr Emerg Care 2001;17:5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar