Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:50:41.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SUPPRESSION OF CODLING MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA: OLETHREUTIDAE) BY SEX PHEROMONE TRAPPING OF MALES1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. R. MacLellan
C. R. MacLellan
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Kentville, Nova Scotia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The intensive use of sex pheromone traps in an insecticide-free apple orchard from 1972 to 1974 reduced the codling moth population and level of fruit damage. The sex ratio of bait-trapped adults indicated that the male population was being reduced by the pheromone traps. In commercial orchards pheromone trapping of males suppressed codling moth damage to fruit but the amount of damage was above acceptable economic levels.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 108 , Issue 10 , October 1976 , pp. 1037 - 1040
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collins, D. L. and Machado, W.. 1937. Effects of light traps on a codling moth infestation: a consideration of four years' data. J. econ. Ent. 30: 422–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D. L. and Machado, W.. 1943. Reactions of the codling moth to artificial light and the use of light traps in its control. J. econ. Ent. 36: 885–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, D. W. and Steiner, L. F.. 1939. Light traps and codling moth control. J. econ. Ent. 32: 867–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLellan, C. R. 1960. Cocooning behaviour of overwintering codling moth larvae. Can. Ent. 92: 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLellan, C. R. 1972. Sex ratio in three stages of field collected codling moth. Can. Ent. 104: 1661–1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLellan, C. R. 1974. Review of insect problems and control. A. Survey of insect injuries to fruit and use of pheromone traps, pp. 64–67. 111th Rep. N.S. Fruit Growers' Ass.Google Scholar
Parrott, P. J. and Collins, D. L.. 1935. Some further observations on the influence of artificial light upon codling moth infestations. J. econ. Ent. 28: 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proverbs, M. D., Logan, D. M., and Newton, J. R.. 1975. A study to suppress codling moth (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) with sex pheromone traps. Can. Ent. 107: 1265–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W. 1975. Manipulating sex pheromones for insect suppression. Environmental Letters 8: 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W., Comeau, A., Hill, A., and Milicevic, G.. 1971. Sex attractant of the codling moth: characterization with electroantennogram technique. Science 174: 297–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worthley, H. N. 1934. A second report on codling moth bands in Pennsylvania. J. econ. Ent. 27: 346–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthley, H. N. 1937. Tests with bait and light to trap codling moth. J. econ. Ent. 30: 417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yothers, M. A. 1930. Summary of results obtained with trap baits in capturing the codling moth in 1927. J. econ. Ent. 20: 576–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar