Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:11:16.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Factors that Reduce the Reproductive Rate of Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) at High Adult Population Densities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. G. Wylie
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario

Abstract

Reproductive rate of the parasite Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) on pupae of the housefly, Musca domestica L., measured by the number of mature progeny produced per female in 18 hours, decreased with increasing parasite:host ratios. This decrease resulted partly because each female laid fewer eggs, and partly because of increased larval mortality caused by superparasitism. The average number of eggs laid per female was reduced because the parasites wasted relatively more time drilling into unsuitable (i.e. parasitized and previously drilled) hosts on which they subsequently laid few or no eggs; and because the females interfered more with each other while ovipositing. Incidence of superparasitism was greater at higher parasite:host ratios because, in spite of increased interference among the females, there were more simultaneous attacks by two or more females on each fly pupa.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burnett, T. 1956. Effects of natural temperatures on oviposition of various numbers of an insect parasite (Hymenoptera, Chalcididae, Tenthredinidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 49: 5559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, T. 1958. Effect of host distribution on the reproduction of Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Canad. Ent. 90: 179191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bach, P., and Sisojevic, P.. 1960. Some effects of temperature and competition on the distribution and relative abundance of Aphytis lingnanensis and A. chrysomphali (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Ecology 41: 153160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bach, P., and Smith, H. S.. 1947. Effects of parasite population density on rate of change of host and parasite populations. Ecology 28: 290298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, E. 1962. The effect of population density on the reproduction of Trichogramma japonicum Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Res. Popul. Ecol. 4: 4759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, W. P., and Pimentel, D.. 1963. Some ecological attributes of a pteromalid parasite and its house fly host. Canad. Ent. 95: 208213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohgushi, R. - i. 1959. (The longevity, egg laying capacity and the number of hosts parasitized by one female of Mormoniella vitripennis (Walk.) (Pteromalidae, Hymenoptera) reared in three species of fly puparia.) (In Japanese: English summary). Insect Ecol. 8: 4657.Google Scholar
Salt, G. 1932. Superparasitism by Collyria calcitrator, Grav. Bull. ent. Res. 23: 211216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, W. R. 1924. La théorie mathématique de l'action des parasites entomophages et la facteur du hasard. Ann. Fac. Sci. Marseille 2: 6989.Google Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. 1949a. Distribution of progeny by Chelonus texanus Cress. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Canad. Ent. 81: 2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. 1949b. Distribution of progeny by Cryptus inornatus Pratt (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Canad. Ent. 81: 285299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1962. An effect of host age on female longevity and fecundity in Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.). Canad. Ent. 94: 990993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1965a. Effects of superparasitism on Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) (Hymenoptcra: Pteromalidae). Canad. Ent. 97: 326331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, H. G. 1965b. Discrimination between parasitized and unparasitized house fly pupae by females of Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Canad. Ent. 97: 279286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar