Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:05:58.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVISION OF THE NEW WORLD CHRYSOLAMPINAE (HYMENOPTERA: CHALCIDOIDEA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. Christopher Darling
D. Christopher Darling
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen's Park, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2C6 and Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1Al
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The taxonomy and biology of New World species of Chrysolampinae are reviewed with diagnoses given for the subfamily, genera, and species. A key to the species of Chrysolampus and a summary of geographic distribution and information on host and floral associations are presented. Three new species are described from North America (Chrysolampus improcerus, C. luridus and C. elegans); Chrysolampus lycti Crawford is transferred to Perilampus and synonymized with the European species P. micans Dalman. The genus Chrysomalla is recorded in the New World for the first time based on the new species Chrysomalla hesperis. An explanation of the historical biogeography of the genera is proposed that is consistent with Late Cretaceous and Tertiary geological, botanical, and climatic information. It is suggested that the extant species are descendents of elements of a widely distributed arid biota.

Résumé

On a révisé la taxonomie et la biologie des espèces de Chrysolampinae du Nouveau-Monde, en établissant le diagnostic de la sous-famille, des genres et des espèces. On fournit une clé à l’espèce des Chrysolampus, ainsi qu’un résumé de leur répartition géographique et des informations connues sur les hôtes et les fleurs auxquels ils s’associent. On décrit trois nouvelles espèces pour l’Amérique du Nord (Chrysolampus improcerus, C. luridus, et C. elegans); Chrysolampus lycti Crawford est transféré chez Perilampus et mis en synonymie avec l’espèce européenne P. micans Dalman. On mentionne le genre Chrysomalla pour la première fois au Nouveau-Monde, sur la base de l’espèce nouvelle Chrysomalla hesperis. On propose une interprétation de la biogéographie des genres qui est appuyée par les données géologiques, botaniques et climatiques du Crétacé avancé et du Tertiaire. On suggère que les espèces existantes descendent de certains des éléments d’une faune aride largement répartie.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 118 , Issue 9 , September 1986 , pp. 913 - 940
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, R.T. 1983. Distribution patterns among arthropods of the north temperate deciduous forest biota. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 70: 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1896. Description of new parasitic Hymenoptera. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 23: 179–234.Google Scholar
Askew, R.R. 1980 (1979). The biology and larval morphology of Chrysolampus thenae (Walker) (Hym., Pteromalidae). Ent. mon. Mag. 115: 155–159.Google Scholar
Axelrod, D.I. 1973. History of the Mediterranean ecosystem in California. pp. 225–277 in di Castri, F., and Mooney, H.A. (Eds.), Mediterranean Type Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, New York. 405 pp.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1972 (1971). Mediterranean Perilampinae: Euperilampus and genera allied to Chrysomalla. Mitt. Münch. ent. Ges. 61: 90–107.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1974. The pteromalid subfamily Eutrichosomatinae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). J. Ent. (B) 43: 129–138.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1978. A generic key to Perilampinae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea), with a revision of Krombeinius n. gen. and Euperilampus Walker. Ent. scand. 9: 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1983. Perilampidae (Hymenoptera) of Mongolia, from Dr. Kaszab's expeditions. Acta Zool. Acad. sci. Hung. 29: 107–121.Google Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1979. Family Pteromalidae. pp. 768–835 in Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D. Jr., Smith, D.R., and Burks, B.D., Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico, Vol. 1. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. 1198 pp.Google Scholar
Clark, W.E. 1971. A taxonomic revision of the weevil genus Tychius Germar in America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Brigham Young Univ. Sci. Bull., Biol. Ser. 13. 39 pp.Google Scholar
Clark, W.E. 1977. North American Tychius: new synonymy and observations on phylogeny and zoogeography (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ent. scand. 8: 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, W.E., and Burke, H.R.. 1977. The curculionid genus Tychius Germar: natural history and coevolution with leguminous host plants. Southwest. Ent. 2: 106–126.Google Scholar
Crawford, J.C. 1914. The species of Perilampidae of America north of Mexico. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 16: 69–76.Google Scholar
Dahms, E.C. 1984 a. Revision of the genus Melittobia (Chalcidoidea: Eulophidae) with the description of seven new species. Mem. Qd. Mus. 21: 271–336.Google Scholar
Dahms, E.C. 1984 b. A review of the biology of species in the genus Melittobia (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) with interpretations and additions using observations on Melittobia australica. Mem. Qd. Mus. 21: 337–360.Google Scholar
Darling, D.C. 1983 a. A review of the New World species of Euperilampus (Hymenoptera; Chalcidoidea), with notes about host associations and phylogenetic relationships. Quaest. Ent. 19: 1–40.Google Scholar
Darling, D.C. 1983 b. Systematic studies of the Perilampidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. 278 pp.Google Scholar
Darling, D.C., and Hanson, P.E.. 1986. Two new species of Spalangiopelta from Oregon (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) with a discussion of wing length variation. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 62: 153–164.Google Scholar
De Santis, L. 1980. Catálogo de los himenópteros brasileños de la serie Parasitica incluyendo Bethyloidea. Editora da Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba. 395 pp.Google Scholar
Ferrière, C., and Kerrich, G.J.. 1958. Hymenoptera. Chalcidoidea. Handbk. Ident. Br. Insects, Vol. 6, Pt. 2 (a). Royal Ent. Soc. London, London. 40 pp.Google Scholar
Gerberg, E.J. 1957. A revision of the New World species of powder post beetles belonging to the family Lyctidae. U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull. 1157. 55 pp.Google Scholar
Gibson, G.A.P. 1985. Some pro- and mesothoracic structures important for phylogenetic analysis of Hymenoptera, with a review of terms used for the structures. Can. Ent. 117: 1395–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodpasture, C. 1975. Comparative courtship behavior and karyology in Monodontomerus (Hymenoptera: Torymidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. 1969. The Pteromalidae of north-western Europe (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Ent. Suppl. 16. 908 pp.Google Scholar
Grissell, E.E. 1981. The identity of nearctic Cerocephala Westwood (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 83: 620–624.Google Scholar
Grissell, E.E., and Goodpasture, C.E.. 1981. A review of the Nearctic Podagrionini, with description of sexual behavior of Podagrion mantis (Hymenoptera: Torymidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 74: 226–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R.A. 1979. A glossary of surface sculpturing. Occas. Pap. Ent., State Calif., Dep. Food Agric. 28. 31 pp.Google Scholar
Hedqvist, K.-J. 1968. Some Chalcidoidea (Hym.) collected in the Philippines, Bismark and Solomon Islands. 1. Leucospidae, Perilampidae and Ormyridae. Ent. Medd. 36: 153–167.Google Scholar
Hedqvist, K.-J. 1975. Notes on Chalcidoidea. VIII. The Swedish Chrysolampini with description of a new genus and species (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Pteromalidae). Ent. Tidskr. 96: 133–136.Google Scholar
Heraty, J.M., and Darling, D.C.. 1984. Comparative morphology of the planidial larvae of Eucharitidae and Perilampidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Syst. Ent. 9: 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, J.V. Jr. 1979. Tertiary and Quaternary environments: historical background for an analysis of the Canadian insect fauna. pp. 31–86 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and Its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108. 573 pp.Google Scholar
Matthews, R.W. 1975. Courtship in parasitic wasps. p. 66–68 in Price, P.W. (Ed.), Evolutionary Strategies in Parasitic Insects and Mites. Plenum Press, New York. 224 pp.Google Scholar
Munz, P.A. 1959. A California Flora. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles. 1681 pp.Google Scholar
Nason, W.A. 1906. Parasitic Hymenoptera of Algonquin, Illinois. N. Ent. News 17: 151–154.Google Scholar
Peck, O. 1951. Superfamily Chalcidoidea. pp. 410–594 in Muesebeck, C.F.W., Krombein, K.V., and Townes, H.K., Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog. U.S. D. Agric. Monograph. 2. 1420 pp.Google Scholar
Peck, O. 1963. A catalogue of the Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Can. Ent. Suppl. 30. 1092 pp.Google Scholar
Peck, O., Bouček, Z., and Hoffer, A.. 1964. Keys to the Chalcidoidea of Czechoslovakia (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 34. 120 pp.Google Scholar
Raven, P.H. 1973. The evolution of Mediterranean floras. pp. 213–224 in di Castri, F., and Mooney, H.A. (Eds.), Mediterranean Type Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, New York. 405 pp.Google Scholar
Riek, E.F. 1966. Australian Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea, Family Pteromalidae, Subfamily Perilampinae. Aust. J. Zool. 14: 1207–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, O.W. 1977. Hymenoptera. Introduction and Key to Families, 2nd ed. Handbk. Ident. Br. Insects, Vol. 6, Pt. 1. Royal Ent. Soc. London, London. 100 pp.Google Scholar
Schauff, M.E. 1985. Taxonomic study of the Nearctic species of Elachertus Spinola (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 87: 843–858.Google Scholar
Takahaski, S., and Sugai, T.. 1982. Mating behavior of the parasitoid wasp Tetrastichus hangenowii (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Ent. Gen. 7: 287–293.Google Scholar
Van den Assem, J., Gijswijt, M.J.G., and Nuhel, B.K.. 1982. Characteristics of courtship and mating behavior used as classificatory criteria in the Eulophidae-Tetrastichinae (Hymenoptera), with special reference to the genus Tetrastichus s.l. Tijd. Ent. 125: 205–220.Google Scholar
Yoshimoto, C.M. 1984. The Insects and Arachnids of Canada. Part. 12. The Families and Subfamilies of Canadian Chalcidoid Wasps. Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea. Agric. Can. Publ. 1760. 149 pp.Google Scholar