Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T22:35:02.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revision of the Canadian species of Amauromyza Hendel (Diptera: Agromyzidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2012

Stéphanie Boucher*
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Macdonald Campus, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec H9X 3V9, Canada
*
Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

The Canadian fauna of the genus Amauromyza Hendel (Diptera: Agromyzidae) is revised and contains 11 species: Amauromyza abnormalis (Malloch), A. angulicornis Zlobin, A. flavifrons (Meigen), A. karli (Hendel), A. luteiceps (Hendel), A. nevadensis Spencer, A. pleuralis (Malloch), A. riparia Sehgal, A. scleritica Spencer, A. shepherdiae Sehgal, and A. subinfumata (Malloch). Among these, three species (A. luteiceps, A. nevadensis, and A. scleritica) are here newly recorded in Canada and A. angulicornis newly recorded in the United States of America. Other species are significantly more widespread in Canada than previously recorded. All species are redescribed and a new identification key to Canadian species is provided.

Résumé

La faune canadienne du genre Amauromyza Hendel (Diptera: Agromyzidae) est révisée et contient 11 espèces : Amauromyza abnormalis (Malloch), A. angulicornis Zlobin, A. flavifrons (Meigen), A. karli (Hendel), A. luteiceps (Hendel), A. nevadensis Spencer, A. pleuralis (Malloch), A. riparia Sehgal, A. scleritica Spencer, A. shepherdiae Sehgal et A. subinfumata (Malloch). Parmi celles-ci, trois espèces (A. luteiceps, A. nevadensis et A. scleritica) sont répertoriées pour la première fois au Canada et A. angulicornis est nouvellement répertoriée aux États-Unis. D'autres espèces se retrouvent beaucoup plus réparties à travers le Canada qu'elles ne l’étaient à l'origine. Toutes les espèces sont décrites à nouveau et une nouvelle clé d'identification des espèces canadiennes est donnée.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bautista-Martinez, N., Vejar-Cota, G., von Tschirnhaus, M. 1997. First record of the amaranth borer fly Amauromyza abnormalis (Malloch) (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in Mexico. Southwestern Entomologist, 22: 461463.Google Scholar
Benavent-Corai, J., Martinez, M., Jiménez Peydró, R. 2005. Catalogue of the hosts-plants of the world Agromyzidae (Diptera). Bollettino Di Zoologia Agraria E Di Bachicoltura. Serie II, 37 (Suppl), 197.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1910. The type-species of North American genera of Diptera. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 37: 499647.Google Scholar
Cumming, J.M., Wood, D.M. 2009. Adult morphology and terminology. In Manual of Central American Diptera, Vol.1. Edited by B.V. Brown, A. Borkent, J.M. Cumming, D.M. Wood, N.E. Woodley and M.A. Zumbado. National Research Council Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. pp. 950.Google Scholar
Czerny, L., Strobl, G. 1909. Spanische Dipteren III. Beitrag. Verhandlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft. Verzeichnis, 59: 121301.Google Scholar
de Meijere, J.C.H 1924. Verzeichnis der holländischen Agromyzinen. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie, 67: 119155.Google Scholar
Fallén, C.F. 1823. Agromyzides Sveciae. Litteris Berlingianis, Lundae (Lund), Sweden.Google Scholar
Frick, K.E. 1952. A generic revision of the family Agromyzidae (Diptera) with a catalogue of New World species. University of California Publications in Entomology, 8: 339452.Google Scholar
Frick, K.E. 1953. Some additions and corrections to the species list of North American Agromyzidae (Diptera). The Canadian Entomologist, 85: 6876.Google Scholar
Frick, K.E. 1959. Synopsis of the species of agromyzid leaf miners described from North America (Diptera). Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 108: 347465.Google Scholar
Hendel, F. 1920. Die paläarktischen Agromyziden (Prodromus einer Monographie). Archiv für Naturgeschichte, Abteilung A, 84: 109174.Google Scholar
Hendel, F. 1927. Beiträge zur systematic der Agromyziden. Zoologischer anzeiger, 69: 248271.Google Scholar
Hendel, F. 1931a. Agromyzidae. Die Fliegen der paläaearktischen Region. Lieferung, 52: 164.Google Scholar
Hendel, F. 1931b. Agromyzidae. Die Fliegen der paläaearktischen Region. Lieferung, 54: 65128.Google Scholar
Hering, E.M. 1960. Neue Blattminen-Studien (Dipt., Lep.). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift. Berlin (N.F.), 7: 119145.Google Scholar
Kaltenbach, J.H. 1858. Die deutschen Phytophagen aus der Klasse der Insekten. Fortsetzung. Alphabetisches Verzeichniss der deutschen Pflanzengattungen (Buchstabe B). Verhandlungen des naturhistorischen Vereins der preussischen Rheinlande und Westfalens, 15: 77161.Google Scholar
Lioy, P. 1864. I ditteri distribuiti secondo un nuovo metodo di classificazione naturale. I. Reale Istituto Veneto di Scienze. Lettere ed Arti, 9: 13111352.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1913. A revision of the species in Agromyza Fallén, and Cerodontha Rondani. (Diptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 6: 269336.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1914. Notes on North American Agromyzidae (Diptera). Entomological News, 25: 308314.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1915a. North American Diptera. The Canadian Entomologist, 47: 1216.Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1915b. Flies of the genus Agromyza, related to Agromyza virens. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 49: 103108.Google Scholar
Meigen, J.W. 1830. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten. Sechster Theil. Schulz, Hamm, Germany.Google Scholar
Nowakowski, J.T. 1960. Studies on mining flies (Diptera, Agromyzidae). 4. A new Palaearctic genus on Leguminosae. Annales Zoologici, 23: 421433.Google Scholar
Nowakowski, J.T. 1962. Introduction to a systematic revision of the family Agromyzidae (Diptera) with some remarks on host plant selection by these flies. Annales Zoologici, Warszawa, 20: 67183.Google Scholar
Papp, L. 1984. Family Agromyzidae. In Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera 9: Micropezidae-Agromyzidae. Edited by Á. Soós and L. Papp. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest. pp. 263343.Google Scholar
Rohdendorf-Holmanová, E.B. 1959. Zwei neue Agromyziden-Arten (Diptera) aus der Caragana arborescens Lam. Acta Societatis Entomologicae Cechosloveniae, Praha, 56: 150154.Google Scholar
Sasakawa, M., Matsumura, T. 1998. Agromyzidae (Diptera) in insect museum, National Institute of Agro-Environmental Sciences, with the description of seven new species. Bulletin of the National Institute of Agro-Environmental Sciences, 13: 117.Google Scholar
Sehgal, V.K. 1971. A taxonomic survey of the Agromyzidae (Diptera) of Alberta, Canada, with observations on host–plant relationships. Quaestiones Entomologicae, 7: 291405.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.A. 1966. Notes on European Agromyzidae (Diptera) – 1. Beiträge zur Entomologie, 16: 285309.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.A. 1969a. Notes on European Agromyzidae – 2. Beiträge zur Entomologie, 19: 526.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.A. 1969b. The Agromyzidae of Canada and Alaska. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 64: 1311.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.A. 1971a. Notes on European Agromyzidae – 3. Beiträge zur Entomologie, 21: 249265.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.A. 1971b. Notes on a revision of the British Agromyzidae, including the description of 14 new species. Entomologist's Gazette, 22: 141193.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.A. 1976. The Agromyzidae of Fennoscandia and Denmark, part 1. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica, 5: 1304.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.A. 1977. Notes on world Agromyzidae, with the description of 16 new species. Beiträge zur Entomologie, 27: 233253.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.A. 1981. A revisionary study of the leaf-mining flies (Agromyzidae) of California. Special Publication, 3273. University of California, Berkeley, California, Division of Agricultural Sciences. pp. 1–489.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.A. 1986. Agromyzidae (Diptera) in Thailand: new species, revisionary notes and new records. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Science (Animal Science), 95: 487507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, K.A. 1987. Agromyzidae. In Manual of Nearctic Diptera, Vol. 2 . Edited by J.F. McAlpine, B.V. Peterson, G.E. Shewell, H.J. Teskey, J.R. Vockeroth and D.M. Wood. Agriculture Canada Monograph No. 28. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. pp. 869879.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.A. 1990. Host specialization in the World Agromyzidae (Diptera). Series Entomologica, Vol. 45. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, K.A., Martinez, M. 1987. Additions and corrections to the Agromyzidae section of the catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera (Papp, 1984). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N.S.), 23: 253271.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.A., Stegmaier, C.E. 1973. Agromyzidae of Florida with a supplement on species from the Caribbean. Arthropods of Florida and Neighboring Land Areas, 7: 1205.Google Scholar
Spencer, K.A., Steyskal, G.C. 1986. Manual of the Agromyzidae (Diptera) of the United States. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook, 638: 1478.Google Scholar
Strobl, P.G. 1902. Novi prilosi fauni Diptera balkanskog poluostrva. Glasnik zemaljski Musej u Bosni I Hercegovini, 14: 461517.Google Scholar
Tschirnhaus, M.V. 1991. New results on the ecology, morphology, and systematics of Agromyzidae (Diptera). In Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Dipterology. Edited by L. Weismann, I. Országh and A.C. Pont. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands. pp. 285313.Google Scholar
Zlobin, V.V. 1996. The genus Amauromyza Hendel (Diptera: Agromyzidae): a clarification of species of the subgenus Annimyzella Spencer. International Journal of Dipterological Research, 7: 271280.Google Scholar
Zlobin, V.V. 1997. Fifteen new species of mining flies (Diptera: Agromyzidae) from North America. International Journal of Dipterological Research, 8: 87111.Google Scholar