Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:43:51.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESPONSE OF IPS GRANDICOLLIS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE) TO THE ATTRACTANT PRODUCED BY ATTACKING MALE BEETLES1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. D. Hertel ,
F. P. Hain  and
R. F. Anderson
G. D. Hertel
Affiliation:
School of Forestry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
F. P. Hain
Affiliation:
School of Forestry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
R. F. Anderson
Affiliation:
School of Forestry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The odor produced by male Ips grandicollis attacking caged loblolly pine bolts was not very effective in attracting marked beetles. Only 2.4% of the 9,417 beetles released around the attracting attacks were recaptured.Unscreened infested bolts lost their attractiveness to responding beetles when about 27 attacks per square foot of bark surface had been reached. More beetles attacked bolts placed outside of a beetle producing area than those within. The latter indicates that a dispersal flight may be needed before response takes place.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 101 , Issue 10 , October 1969 , pp. 1084 - 1091
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. F. 1948. Host selection by the pine engraver. J. econ. Ent. 41: 596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, M. D., 1968. Scolytid pheromones — ready or not. Can. Ent. 100: 1116–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J. H. 1967. Factors influencing the response of Ips confusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to male attractant. Can. Ent. 99: 1164–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1966. The effect of attack by the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Oliver) on log attractiveness. Can. Ent. 98: 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1967. Response behaviour of scolytid beetles and odour meteorology. Can. Ent. 99: 1132–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. W., and Osgood, E. A. Jr. 1964. An emergence container for recovering southern pine beetles from infested bolts. J. econ. Ent. 57: 783–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gara, R. I. 1963. Studies on the flight behavior of Ips confusus (LeC.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in response to attractive material. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 22: 51–66.Google Scholar
Gara, R. I. 1964. Studies on the behavior of Ips confusus (LeC.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in response to host attractants. Ph.D. Thesis, Ore. State Univ., Corvallis.Google Scholar
Gara, R. I., and Vité, J. P.. 1962. Studies on the flight pattern of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in second growth ponderosa pine forests. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 21: 275–289.Google Scholar
Goeden, R. D., and Norris, D. M. Jr. 1964. Attraction of Scolytus quadrispinosus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to Carya spp. for oviposition. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57: 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R. P. 1965. Populations of Ips engraver beetles following summer thinning in a loblolly pine plantation. Hiwassee Land Co., Calhoun, Tenn., Forest Res. Note 14.Google Scholar
McMullen, L. H., and Atkins, M. D.. 1962. On the flight and host selection of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 94: 1309–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, F. D. 1967. Ips grandicollis in south Australia. Austral. Forest 31: 134–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A. 1963. Response of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins to volatile attractants. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 22: 23–38.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., and Gara, R. I.. 1962. Volatile attractants from ponderosa pine attacked by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 21: 251–273.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., Gara, R. I., and Kliefoth, R. A.. 1963. Collection and bioassay of a volatile fraction attractive to Ips confusus (LeC.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 22: 39–50.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., Gara, R. I., and von Scheller, H. D.. 1964. Field observations on the response to attractants of bark beetles infesting southern pines. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 22: 461–470.Google Scholar
Ward, J. G. D. 1967. Investigations dealing with species attractant of Ips grandicollis (Eichh.) and the dispersal in different types of vegetation. A problem. Duke Univ., School of Forestry, Durham, N.C.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. C. 1962. Stridulating organs in three southeastern Ips bark beetles. Fla Ent. 45: 43–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, R. C. 1964. Attraction and development of Ips bark beetle populations in artificially infested pine bolts exposed on firetowers and turntables in Florida. Fla Ent. 47: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, R. C., McClelland, W. J., Murillo, Ruth M., and Ostmark, E. O.. 1967. Stridulation and behavior in two southeastern Ips bark beetles. Fla Ent. 50: 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. L. 1961. Stridulation in the genus Ips DeGeer. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 37: 187–188.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L. 1962. The attraction created by males of the bark beetle Ips confusus (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacking ponderosa pine. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 38: 141–145.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L., and Vité, J. P.. 1961. Studies on the host selection behavior of Ips confusus (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacking Pinus ponderosa. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 21: 79–95.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L., and Bushing, R. W.. 1963. The olfactory response of Ips confusus (LeConte)(Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to the secondary attraction in the laboratory. Can. Ent. 95: 1066–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar