Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:08:21.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Morphology and Functions of the Reproductive Systems of Dendroctonus monticolae1 Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. F. Cerezke
H. F. Cerezke
Affiliation:
Forest Entomology and Pathology Laboratory, Calgary, Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The male and female reproductive organs of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus monticolae Hopk. are described, and interpretations given for functions of the parts on the basis of activity during mating, sperm transfer, egg formation and ovulation. Some morphological changes of the reproductive organs during the adult life cycle are also noted.

Three pairs of accessory glands associated with spermatophore production are evident in the male beetle. One of these was previously termed the seminal vesicles. A complex musculature operates the male genital organ during copulation. The female organs have four telotrophic ovarioles with a posterior calyx region that has a possible secretory function. Evidence indicates that organs previously termed "colleterial glands" have a digestive and reabsorbing function. The bursa copulatrix may be more closely allied with the function of the accessory glands than with the mating process. Parts of the spermatheca have been more precisely defined according to function.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 96 , Issue 3 , March 1964 , pp. 477 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. M. 1950. A cytological and cytochemical study of the male accessory gland in the Japanese beetle, Popillia japonica. Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole 49: 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslam, N. A. 1961. An assessment of some internal characters in the higher classification of the Curculionidae s.l. (Coleoptera). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 113: 417–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, M. D., and Chapman, J. A.. 1957. Studies on nervous system anatomy of the Douglas fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Scolytidae). Canad. Ent. 89: 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, M. D., and Farris, S. H.. 1962. A contribution to the knowledge of flight muscle changes in the Scolytidae (Coleoptera). Canad. Ent. 94: 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, E. C. 1956. Revision of the Nearctic species of Agrotes (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Canad. Ent. 88, Suppl. 1, 101 pp.Google Scholar
Bonhag, P. F. 1958. Ovarian structure and vitellogenesis in insects. Annu. Rev. Ent. 3: 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonhag, P. F. 1959. Histological and histochemical studies on the ovary of the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana (L.) Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent. 16: 81–124.Google Scholar
Bryan, J. H. D. 1954. Cytological and cytochemical studies of oogenesis Popilius disjunctus Illiger (Coleoptera-Polyphaga). Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole 107: 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchner, P. 1953. Endosymbiose der Tiere mit pflanzlichen Mikroorganismen. Verlag Birkhaüser, Basel, Switzerland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chararas, C. 1956. Anatomie et biologie des Coléoptères Curculionides xylophages comparées à celles des Coléoptères Scolytides. Rev. Path. Veg. 35: 113–187.Google Scholar
Davenport, H. A. 1960. Histological and histochemical technics. W. B. Saunders Co., London.Google Scholar
Escherich, K. 1894. Anatomische Studien über das männliche Genitalsystem der Coleopteren. Z. wiss. Zool. 57: 620–641.Google Scholar
Francke-Grosmann, H. 1948. Über den Kopulationsapparat des Riesenbastkäfers, Dendroctonus micans Kug. Verh. dtsch. Zool., Kiel, 1948: 219–225.Google Scholar
Francke-Grosmann, H. 1950. Über Kopulation, Eiablage und Gelbkörperbildung beim Riesenbastkäfer, Dendroctonus micans Kug. Verh. dtsch. Ges. angew. Ent. 1949: 142–153.Google Scholar
Heberdey, R. F. 1931. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte, vergleichenden Anatomie und Physiologie der weiblichen Geschlechtsausführwege der Insekten. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 22: 416–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, A. D. 1909. Contributions towards a monograph of the scolytid beetles. I. The genus Dendroctonus. Tech. Ser. U.S. Bur. Ent. 17, 67 pp.Google Scholar
Hopkins, A. D. 1915. Preliminary classification of the superfamily Scolytoidea. U.S.D.A. Tech. Ser. U.S. Bur. Ent. 17: 165–232.Google Scholar
Imms, A. D. 1957. A general textbook of entomology. Methuen and Co., London.Google Scholar
Karg, G. 1962. Die Bursa copulatrix und ihre Chitinbildungen bei einigen Elateridenarten (Col.) Dtsch. ent. Z. 9: 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, J. B. 1946. The structure of the gonads of the woodeating beetle, Passalus cornutus Fab. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 39: 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindroth, C. H., and Palmén, E.. 1956. Coleoptera, pp. 69–76. In Tuxen, S. L. (ed.). Taxonomist's glossary of genitalia in insects. Munksgaard, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, M. E. 1932. The structure and development of the reproductive system in the Coleoptera with notes on its homologies. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 75: 49–130.Google Scholar
Mulnard, J. 1954. Étude morphologique et cytochimique de l'oogenese chez Acanthoscelides obtectus Say (Bruchide-Coléoptère). Arch. Biol., Paris 65: 262–314.Google Scholar
Nüsslin, O. 1911. Phylogenie und System der Borkenkäfer. Z. wiss. InsektBiol. 7, Nos. 1–12.Google Scholar
Nüsslin, O. 1912. Phylogenie und System der Borkenkäfer. Z. wiss. InsektBiol. 8, Nos. 1–7.Google Scholar
Reid, R. W. 1958a. Internal changes in the female mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus monticolae Hopk., associated with egg laying and flight. Canad. Ent. 90: 464–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, R. W. 1958b. The behavior of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus monticolae Hopk., during mating, egg laying, and gallery construction. Canad. Ent. 90: 505–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, R. W. 1962. Biology of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus monticolae Hopkins, in the East Kootenay region of British Columbia. II. Behavior in the host, fecundity, and internal changes in the female. Canad. Ent. 94: 605–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, A. G., and Brooks, M. A.. 1958. Internal symbiosis in insects. Annu. Rev. Ent. 3: 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, H. A. 1935. A morphological study of the bark beetle, Dendroctonus monticolae Hopk. Unpub. thesis, Faculty of Graduate Studies, McGill University, Montreal. 66 pp.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. G. 1961. Ovariole numbers in Coleoptera. Canad. J. Zool. 39: 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. B. 1959. Termination of diapause in the Douglas fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), as an aid to continuous rearing. Canad. Ent. 91: 520–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlottman, L. L., and Bonhag, P. F.. 1956. Histology of the ovary of the adult mealworm Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent. 11: 351–394.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. and Muir, F.. 1912. The comparative anatomy of the male genital tube in Coleoptera. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 1912: 477–642.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1935. Principles of insect morphology. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Stein, F. 1847. Vergleichende Anatomie und Physiologie der Insekten. I. Die weiblichen Geschlechtsorgane der Käfer. Duncker und Humbolt, Berlin.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., and Rudinsky, J. A.. 1957. Contribution toward a study of Douglas fir beetle development. For. Sci. 3: 156–167.Google Scholar
Wieman, H. L. 1910. A study in the germ cells of Leptinotarsa signaticollis. J. Morph. 21: 135–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. 1953. The principles of insect physiology. Methuen and Co., London.Google Scholar
Williams, J. L. 1945. The anatomy of the internal genitalia of some Coleoptera. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 47: 73–87.Google Scholar
Zacharuk, R. Y. 1958. Structures and functions of the reproductive systems of the prairie grain wireworm, Ctenicera aeripennis destructor (Brown) (Coleoptera: Elateridae). Canad. J. Zool. 36: 725–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar