Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:53:22.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Laboratory Test of Three Systemic Insecticides Against the Spruce Budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. P. Randall
Affiliation:
Chemical Control Section, Ottawa, Ontario
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The control of bud infesting insects presents a problem to which the systemic insecticides theoretically offer a promise of solution. The systemic action of some organophosphorus insecticides has been well demonstrated on many agricultural crops. An excellent bibliography on these and other systemic insecticides has been compiled bv Giang (1954). Anderson (1955), reported mortality of eastern tent caterpillars, Malacosoma americanum (F.) when fed on leaves from wild cherry seedlings grown in soil treated with parathion. Recently, Norris (1960) and coppel and Norris (1960, 1961), reported that some of the newer organophosphorus insecticides show a high degree of insecticidal action in both elm and white pine. In 1960 Dever and Davis reported success of phosphamidon against gypsy moth larvae feeding on white pine. This gave further indication that a systemic insecticide might be effective to defoliators on other conifers. Other investigators have shown that the absorption characteristics of systemic insecticides vary greatly with the soil type, absorption being greatest in sandy soils (Getzin and Chapman 1959, 1960), Zaki and Reynolds (1961)). These findings may be of practical importance in forest insect control since many forest sites are either rocky, sandy, or submarginal agricultural lands, and hence insecticide spray residues of this type may be reabsorbed into the tree.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1962

References

Anderson, R. F. 1961. Internal medication of plants for the control of insects. Jour. Econ. Ent. 48 (6): 187190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppel, H. C., and Norris, D. M. Jr., 1960. Systemic insecticides for control of the introduced pine sawfly, Diprion similis, with notes on parasite survival. Jour. Econ. Ent. 53(4): 648–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppel, H. C., and Norris, D. M. Jr., 1961. Systemic insecticidal action of certain phosphates in Pinus strobus against Diprion similis. Jour. Econ. Ent. 54(5): 1061–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dever, D. A., and Davis, D. L.. 1960. Aerial applications of phosphamidon to forested areas. California Chemical Company, Ortho Division, Moorestown, N.J. Research Report. File No. 721: 110. Nov. 10, 1960.Google Scholar
Getzin, L. W., and Chapman, R. K.. 1959. Effect of soils upon the uptake of systemic insecticides by plants. Jour. Econ. Ent. 52(6): 1160–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getzin, L. W., and Chapman, R. K.. 1960. The fate of phorate in soils. Jour. Econ. Ent. 53(1): 4751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giang, P. A. 1954. A bibliography of systemic insecticides. U.S. Dept. Agric., Bur. Ent. Res. Branch E-874.Google Scholar
Norris, D. M. Jr., 1960. Systemic insecticidal action in the cortical tissues of elm twigs. Jour. Econ. Ent. 53(6): 1034–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaki, M., and Reynolds, H. T.. 1961. Effects of various soil types and methods of application upon uptake of three systemic insecticides by cotton plants in the greenhouse. Jour. Econ. Ent. 54(3): 568572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar