Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:27:26.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INSECT AND MITE ASSOCIATES OF SCOLYTUS MULTISTRIATUS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE) IN CALIFORNIA1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Ann E. Hajek
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley 94720
Donald L. Dahlsten
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley 94720

Abstract

Thirty-four species of insects associated with Scolytus multistriatus (Marsham) were reared or collected from several species of elm collected throughout California. Few of these species occurred in large numbers and many of their ecological roles in this subcortical habitat are unknown. Predators were uncommon; only 6 species of parasitic Hymenoptera were reared, 3 of which were not previously known from California. One, Dendrosoter protuberans (Nees), had previously been released for biological control of S. multistriatus only as far west as Colorado. The most abundant insect associate reared from northern California, Cheiropachus quadrum (F.), exhibited a maximum percentage parasitism of 2%. Seven species of mites, including 2 new species, were also collected in association with S. multistriatus.

Résumé

Trente-quatre espèces d'insectes associés au Scolytus multistriatus (Marsham) ont été élevées ou collectionnées sur plusieurs espèces d'ormes partout en Californie. Peu de ces espèces étaient nombreuses et pour plusieurs, leur rôle écologique dans cet habitat sous-cortical est inconnu. Les prédateurs étaient peu communs; seulement 6 espèces d'hyménoptères parasitiques ont été élevées, dont 3 sont nouvelles pour la Californie. L'une d'entre elles, Dendrosoter protuberans (Nees), avait antérieurement été relâchée comme auxiliaire de lutte contre le S. multistriatus, mais pas à l'ouest du Colorado. L'associé le plus abondant du scolyte au nord de la Californie, Cheiropachus quadrum (F.), a montré un pourcentage maximum de parasitisme de 2%. Sept espèces d'acariens dont 2 nouvelles ont été collectionnées en association avec le S. multistriatus.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armitage, H. 1951. Current insect notes. Bull. Calif. Dep. Agric. 40: 111118.Google Scholar
Arnett, R.H. 1968. The Beetles of the United States. Am. Ent. Inst., Michigan. 1112 pp.Google Scholar
Bailey, S.F. 1957. The Thrips of California. Part I: Suborder Terebrantia. Bull. Calif. Insect Surv. 4(5). 22 pp.Google Scholar
Balduf, W.V. 1935. The Bionomics of Entomophagous Coleoptera. E.W. Classey, Britain. 220 pp.Google Scholar
Ball, J.C. and Dahlsten, D.L.. 1973. Hymenopterous parasites of Ips paraconfusus Lanier and their contribution to mortality. I. Influence of host tree and tree diameter on parasitization. Can. Ent. 105: 14531464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaver, R.A. 1966. The biology and immature stages of Entedon leucogramma (Ratzeburg) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a parasite of bark beetles. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. A 41(1–3): 3741.Google Scholar
Beaver, R.A. 1967 a. Hymenoptera associated with elm bark beetles in Wytham Wood, Berks. Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 17: 141150.Google Scholar
Beaver, R.A. 1967 b. Notes on the biology of the parasitic mite Pyemotes scolyti Oud. (Acari: Pyemotidae). Entomologist 100: 912.Google Scholar
Berryman, A.A. 1968. Development of sampling techniques and life tables for the fir engraver Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 100: 11381147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, J.R. and Moser, J.C.. 1983. Role of two phoretic mites in transmission of bluestain fungus, Ceratocystis minor. Ecol. Ent. 8: 912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, D.E. and Stark, J.W.. 1973. The bark and ambrosia beetles of California. Bull. Calif. Insect Surv. 16: 1920.Google Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1979 a. Eulophidae. pp. 967–1022 in Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D., Smith, D.R., and Burks, B.D. (Eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico. Smithsonian Institute Press. 3 vols. 2735 pp.Google Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1979 b. Pteromalidae. pp. 768–835 in Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D., Smith, D.R., and Burks, B.D. (Eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico. Smithsonian Institute Press. 3 vols. 2735 pp.Google Scholar
Clark, W.E. 1978. The weevil genus Sibinia Germer: Natural history, taxonomy, phylogeny and zoogeography, with revision of the New World species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Quaest. ent. 14: 91387.Google Scholar
Cole, F.R. 1969. The Flies of Western North America. Univ. California Press. 693 pp.Google Scholar
Dahlsten, D.L. 1982. Relationships between bark beetles and their natural enemies. pp. 140–182 in Mitton, J.B. and Sturgeon, K.B. (Eds.), Bark Beetles in North American Conifers. Univ. Texas Press, Austin. 527 pp.Google Scholar
Deyrup, M.A. and Gara, R.I.. 1978. Insects associated with Scolytidae (Coleoptera) in western Washington. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 54: 270282.Google Scholar
Furniss, R.L. and Carolin, V.M.. 1977. Western Forest Insects. Misc. Publ. U.S. Dep. Agric. Forest Serv. 1339. 654 pp.Google Scholar
Grissell, E.E. 1981. The identity of Nearctic Cerocephala Westwood (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 83(4): 620624.Google Scholar
Hajek, A.E. and Dahlsten, D.L.. 1981. First California record for Dendrosoter protuberans (Nees) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 57: 504505.Google Scholar
Harlow, W.M. and Harrar, E. S.. 1950. Textbook of Dendrology. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, N.Y.555 pp.Google Scholar
Hatch, M.H. 1957. The Beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Part II. Staphyliniformia. Univ. Wash. Press. 384 PP.Google Scholar
Hatch, M.H. 1961. The Beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Part III. Pselaphidae and Diversicornia I. Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 16. 503 pp.Google Scholar
Hatch, M.H. 1971. The Beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Part V. Rhipiceroidea, Sternoxi, Phytophaga, Rhynchophora and Lamellicornia. Univ. Wash. Publ. Ent. 16. 662 pp.Google Scholar
Herting, B. 1973. A Catalogue of Parasites and Predators of Terrestrial Arthropods. Section A: Host or Prey/Enemy. Vol. III. Coleoptera to Strepsiptera. Commonw. Inst. Biol. Control. 185 pp.Google Scholar
Hodges, R.W. 1978. The Moths of America North of Mexico. Fasc. 6.1: Gelechioidea: Cosmopterigidae. E.W. Classey, Britain. 166 pp.Google Scholar
Hoffman, C.H. 1942. Annotated list of elm insects in the United States. Misc. Publ. U.S. Dep. Agric. 466. 20 PP.Google Scholar
Hostetler, B.B. and Brewer, J.W.. 1976. Survival of Dendrosoter protuberans, a parasitoid of Scolytus multistriatus, in Colorado. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 69: 8588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, B.H. 1970. Dendrosoter protuberans (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), an introduced larval parasite of Scolytus multistriatus. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 351358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, B.H. 1979. The effect of multilure on parasites of the European bark beetle, Scolytus multistriatus. Bull ent. Soc. Am. 25: 116118.Google Scholar
Kinn, D.N. 1971. The life cycle and behavior of Cercolepius coelonotus (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 65. 66 pp.Google Scholar
Knutson, L.V. 1963. Revision of the genus Hadrobregmus of North America. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 65(3): 177195.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J.F. and Powell, J.A.. 1969. Host relationships in North American fungus-feeding moths (Oecóphoridae, Oinophilidae, Tineidae). Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 138(2): 2951.Google Scholar
Leng, C.W. 1920. Catalogue of the Coleoptera of America, North of Mexico. John Sherman, NY. 470 pp. Suppl. I: 1927. C.W. Leng and A.J. Mutchler. 178 pp. Suppl. II: 1933. C.W. Leng and A.J. Mutchler. 112 pp. Suppl. III: 1939. R.E. Blackwelder. 146 pp. Suppl. IV: 1948. R.E. Blackwelder and R.M. Blackwelder. 87 pp.Google Scholar
Lepesme, P. 1944. Encyclopédie Entomologique. XXII. Les Coléoptères des denrées alimentaires et des produits industriels entreposés. P. Lechevalier, Paris. 335 pp.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. 1973. Thrips: Their Biology, Ecology and Economic Importance. Academic Press, NY. 349 pp.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. 1964. The Cerambycidae of North America. Part V. Taxonomy and Classifiction of the Subfamily Cerambycinae, Tribes Callichromini through Ancylocerini. Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 22. 197 pp.Google Scholar
Mamaev, B.M. 1975. Morphological and ecological characteristics of xylophilous cylindrical bark beetles in the fauna of the European part of the USSR based on larval indices (Coleoptera, Colydiidae). Biol. Nauk (Moscow) 18(12): 1622. (Abstract in English in Abst. Ent. 7(11), 17 Nov. 1976.)Google Scholar
Marsh, P.M. 1979. Braconidae. pp. 144–295 in Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D., Smith, D.R., and Burks, B.D. (Eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico. Smithsonian Institute Press. 3 vols. 2735 PP.Google Scholar
Michalski, J. 1976. Sex ratio of some chalcids (Hym., Chalcidoidea) parasitizing Scolytus spp. (Col., Scolytidae) during the development of the host generation. Polskie Pismo ent. 46: 315.Google Scholar
Moser, J.C. 1975. Mite predators of the southern pine beetle. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68: 11131116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1979. Climatological Data 83: 610.Google Scholar
New, T.R. 1974. Psocoptera. Handbk Ident. Br. Insects 1(7). 102 pp.Google Scholar
Nikitskii, N.B. 1976. Larval morphology and ecology of the nocturnal ground beetles of the genus Hypophloeus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Zool. Zh. 55: 4151.Google Scholar
Pechuman, L.L. 1937. An annotated list of insects found in the bark and wood of Ulmus americana L. in New York State. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 32: 821.Google Scholar
Péricart, J. 1972. Faune de l'Europe et du Bassin Méditerranéen. VII. Hémiptères: Anthocoridae, Cimicidae, et Microphysidae de l'Ouest-Paléarctique. Masson et Cie, Paris. pp. 274278.Google Scholar
Pool, R.A.F. and Hiatt, P.W.. 1976. Dutch elm disease in California. Pl. Dis. Reptr 60(2): 166167.Google Scholar
Powell, J.A. 1964. Occurrence in California of Oinophila v-flava, a moth probably introduced from Europe (Lepidoptera: Tineoidea). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 40: 155157.Google Scholar
Ryan, R.B. 1962. A device for measuring the oviposition potential of a bark beetle parasite. Can. Ent. 94: 737738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabrosky, C.W. 1957. Two new and economically significant Chloropidae, with the description of a new genus (Diptera). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 40: 151156.Google Scholar
Schenkling, S. 1936. Coleopterorum Catalogus. 149: Curculionidae: Rhynchophorinae, Cossoninae. W. Junk. 212 pp.Google Scholar
Schroeder, D. 1974. Untersuchungen ueber die Aussichten einer biologischen Bekaempfung von Scolytiden and Ulmen als Mittel zur Einschraenking des Ulmensterbens. (Studies on the possibilities of biological control of elm bark beetles (Scolytidae) with the view of reduction of the Dutch elm disease.) Z. angew. Ent. 76(2): 150159. (Abstract in English)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, R.L. and Moser, J.C.. 1968. New species of mites from pine (Acarina: Tarsochelidae, Eupalopsellidae, Caligonellidae, Cryptognathidae, Raphignathidae and Neophyllobiidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 70: 307317.Google Scholar
Smiley, R.L. and Moser, J.C.. 1974. New tarsonemids associated with bark beetles (Acarina: Tarsonemidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 67: 639665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stary, P. 1957. Notes on the Braconidae (Hym.) of Czechoslovakia. Cas. csl. Spol. ent. 54: 277292.Google Scholar
Summers, F.M. and Price, D.W.. 1970. Review of the mite family Cheyletidae. Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 61: 1153.Google Scholar
Thompson, W.R. 1943. A Catalogue of the Parasites and Predators of Insect Pests. I. Parasite–Host Catalogue. I. Parasites of the Arachnida and Coleoptera. Belleville. 151 pp.Google Scholar
Triplehorn, C. A. and Moser, J.C.. 1970. Two new species of Corticeus from Mexico and Honduras (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Coleopt's Bull. 24: 4750.Google Scholar
Truchan, J.G. 1970. Field evaluation of Dendrosoter protuberans as a biological control agent for Scolytus multistriatus, the primary vector of Dutch Elm Disease. Ph.D. Diss., Michigan State Univ. 97 pp.Google Scholar
White, R.E. 1962. The Anobiidae of Ohio (Coleoptera). Bull. Ohio biol. Surv. 1(4). 58 pp.Google Scholar
Williams, L.H. and Brown, H.E.. 1969. Some biological investigations of the smaller European elm bark beetle in Missouri with reference to systemic insecticidal control. J. econ. Ent. 62: 13811386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar