Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:18:25.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HOST DISCRIMINATION BY THE APHID PARASITOID APHELINUS ASYCHIS (HYMENOPTERA: APHELINIDAE): WHEN SUPERPARASITISM IS NOT ADAPTIVE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

B. Bai  and
M. Mackauer
B. Bai
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
M. Mackauer
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Females of the solitary parasitoid Aphelinus asychis Walker discriminated between unparasitized and parasitized second-instar nymphs of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Wasps normally avoided superparasitism, except when they were confined with few hosts for a long time. Parasitoid females did not need previous experience with unparasitized aphids (learning) in order to discriminate. They probed with the ovipositor any aphids encountered, a behaviour suggesting that host acceptance and rejection were determined by internal cues. Prolonged ovipositor insertion (>80 s) was correlated with host acceptance and egg deposition, but short insertion times (≤80 s) generally indicated host rejection. Females tended to reject both self- and conspecific-parasitized aphids when provided with two of each kind. We consider hypotheses mat conspecific superparasitism may be adaptive and give examples to show exceptions. We propose that, in egg-limited parasitoid species such as A. asychis, a reproductive strategy based on the regulation of egg production and on oosorption can explain the equal avoidance of self and conspecific superparasitism.

Résumé

Les femelles du parasitoïde solitaire Aphelinus asychis Walker discriminent entre des larves de deuxième stade parasitées et non-parasitées du puceron du pois, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Les guêpes ont généralement évité le superparasitisme, sauf lorsque limitées à un petit nombre d’hôtes pour une longue période. Le pouvoir de discrimination des femelles parasitoïdes n’a pas requis d’expérience antécédente avec des pucerons non-parasités (apprentissage). A l’aide de leur ovipositeur, elles ont sondé tous les pucerons rencontrés, un comportement qui suggère que l’acceptation ou le rejet d’un hôte était déterminé par des indices internes. Les longues insertions d’ovipositeur (>80 s) étaient corrélées avec l’acceptation de l’hôte et la ponte d’oeufs, mais les courtes insertions (≤80 s) indiquaient généralement le rejet de l’hôte. Les femelles ont eu tendance à rejeter des pucerons parasités par elles-même ou par des femelles con-spécifiques lorsqu’on leur en a offert deux de chaque type. Nous considérons des hypothèses selon lesquelles le superparasitisme con-spécifique peut être adaptif et donnons des exemples d’exceptions. Nous proposons que chez les espèces de parasitoïdes dont le nombre d’oeufs est limité, comme c’est le cas chez A. asychis, une stratégie reproductrice basée sur la régulation de la production d’oeufs et sur l’oösorption peut expliquer la tendance égale à éviter le superparasitisme con-spécifique et personnel.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 122 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 363 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alphen, J.J.M. van. 1988. Patch time allocation by insect parasitoids: superparasitism and aggregation. pp. 215–221in de Jong, G. (Ed.), Population Genetics and Evolution. Springer Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alphen, J.J.M. van, van Dijken, M.J., and Waage, J.K.. 1987. A functional approach to superparasitism: host discrimination needs not be learnt. Neth. J. Zool. 37: 167–179.Google Scholar
Alphen, J.J.M. van, and Nell, H.W.. 1982. Superparasitism and host discrimination by Asobara tabida Nees (Braconidae, Alysiinae), a larval parasitoid of Drosophilidae. Neth. J. Zool. 32: 232–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alphen, J.J.M. van, and Vet, L.E.M.. 1986. An evolutionary approach to host finding and selection. pp. 23–61in Waage, J., and Greathead, D. (Eds.), Insect Parasitoids. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Bai, B., and Mackauer, M.. 1990. Oviposition and host-feeding patterns by Aphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) at different aphid densities. Ecol. Ent. In press.Google Scholar
Bakker, K., van Alphen, J.J.M., van Batenburg, F.H.D.van der Hoeven, N., Nell, H.W., van Strienvan Liempt, W.F.T.H., and Turlings, T.C.J.. 1985. The function of host discrimination and superparasitism in parasitoids. Oecologia 67: 572–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckage, N.E., and Templeton, T.J.. 1986. Physiological effects of parasitism by Apanteles congregatus in terminal-stage tobacco hornworm larvae. J. Insect Physiol. 32: 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, H., and Barrows, E.M.. 1978. Oviposition and host feeding behavior of Aphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae) on Schizaphis graminum (Homoptera: Aphididae) and some reactions of aphids to this parasite. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 80: 441–455.Google Scholar
Charnov, E.L., and Skinner, S.W.. 1984. Evolution of host selection and clutch size in parasitoid wasps. Flor. Ent. 67: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnov, E.L., and Skinner, S.W.. 1985. Complementary approaches to the understanding of parasitoid oviposition decisions. Environ. Ent. 14: 383–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, F.J., and Mackauer, M.. 1984. Inter- and intraspecific larval competition in Aphidius smithi and Praon pequodorum (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Can. Ent. 116: 1097–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, F.J., and Mackauer, M.. 1986. Host discrimination and larval competition in the aphid parasite Ephedrus californicus. Entomologia exp. appl. 41: 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloutier, C. 1984. The effect of host density on egg distribution by the solitary parasitoid Aphidius nigripes (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Can. Ent. 116: 805–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijken, M.J. van, and Waage, J.K.. 1987. Self and conspecific superparasitism in Trichogramma evanescens. Entomologia exp. appl. 43: 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, G., Puttler, B., and Dawson, L.. 1960. Rearing of three spotted alfalfa aphid hymenopterous parasites for mass release. J. econ. Ent. 53: 655–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R.C. 1971. Aspects of the physiology of endoparasitic Hymenoptera. Biol. Rev. 46: 243–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R.C., and Ganesalingam, V.K.. 1970. Changes in the composition of host haemolymph after attack by an insect parasitoid. Nature 227: 191–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanders, S.E. 1942. Oosorption and ovulation in relation to oviposition in the parasitic Hymenoptera. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 35: 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Force, D.C., and Messenger, P.S.. 1965. Laboratory studies on competition among three parasites of the spotted alfalfa aphid Therioaphis maculata (Buckton). Ecology 46: 853–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerling, D., Roitberg, B.D., and Mackauer, M.. 1990. Instar-specific defense of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum: influence on oviposition success of the parasite Aphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). J. Insect Behav. In Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, P.A. 1973. The biology of Aphelinus flavus [Hym. Aphelinidae], a parasite of the sycamore aphid Drepanosiphum platanoides [Hemipt. Aphididae]. Entomophaga 18: 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, E.A. 1922. Some bionomics of Aphelinus semiflavus (Howard) chalcid parasite of aphids. Ohio J. Sci. 22: 209–236.Google Scholar
Hubbard, S.F., Marris, G., Reynolds, A., and Rowe, G.W.. 1987. Adaptive patterns in the avoidance of super-parasitism by solitary parasitic wasps. J. Anim. Ecol. 56: 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R.N. 1979. Optimal diets under the energy maximization principle: the effects of recognition time and learning. Am. Nat. 113: 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasa, Y., Suzuki, Y., and Matsuda, H.. 1984. Theory of oviposition strategy of parasitoids. I. Effect of mortality and limited egg number. Theor. Pop. Biol. 26: 205–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, D.J. 1966. Observations on the biology of Caraphractus cinctus Walker (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), a parasitoid of the eggs of Dytiscidae. III. The adult life and the sex ratio. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 118: 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, H.B., and Eikenbary, R.D.. 1971. Bionomics of Aphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) an introduced parasite of the sorghum greenbug. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, M.A., and Kidd, N.A.C.. 1986. Host-feeding strategies in hymenopteran parasitoids. Biol. Rev. 61: 395–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klomp, H., Teerink, B.J., and Ma, Wei Chung. 1980. Discrimination between parasitized and unparasitized hosts in the egg parasite Trichogramma embryophagum (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae): a matter of learning and forgetting. Neth. J. Zool. 30: 254–277.Google Scholar
Lenteren, J.C. van. 1976. The development of host discrimination and the prevention of superparasitism in the parasite Pseudeucoila bochei Weld (Hym.: Cynipidae). Neth. J. Zool. 26: 1–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenteren, J.C. van. 1981. Host discrimination by parasitoids. pp. 153–179in Nordlund, D.A., Jones, R.L., and Lewis, W.J. (Eds.), Semiochemicals: Their Role in Pest Control. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Lenteren, J.C. van, and Bakker, K.. 1975. Discrimination between parasitized and unparasitized hosts in the parasitic wasp Pseudeucoila bochei: a matter of learning. Nature 254: 417–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackauer, M. 1972. Antennal amputation as a method for biomarking aphids. J. econ. Ent. 65: 1725–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackauer, M. 1982. Fecundity and host utilization of the aphid parasite Aphelinus semiflavus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) at two host densities. Can. Ent. 114: 721–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackauer, M. 1990. Host discrimination and larval competition in solitary endoparasitoids. pp. 41–62in Mackauer, M., Ehler, L.E., and Roland, J. (Eds.), Critical Issues in Biological Control. Intercept, Andover, Hants.Google Scholar
Mackauer, M., and Bisdee, H.E.. 1965. Two simple devices for rearing aphids. J. econ. Ent. 58: 365–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackauer, M., and Chow, F.J.. 1985. Parasites and parasite impact. pp. 95–118in McLean, G.D., Garrett, R.G., and Ruesink, W.G. (Eds.), Plant Virus Epidemics. Academic Press, Sydney.Google Scholar
Price, P.W. 1970. Trail odors: recognition by insects parasitic on cocoons. Science 170: 546–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salt, G. 1937. The sense used by Trichogramma to distinguish between parasitized and unparasitized hosts. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 122: 57–75.Google Scholar
Salt, G. 1961. Competition among insect parasites. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 15: 96–119.Google Scholar
Sugimoto, T., Uenichi, M., and Machida, F.. 1986. Foraging for patchily-distributed leaf-miners by the parasitoid, Dapsilarthra rufiventris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). I. Discrimination of previously searched leaflets. Appl. Ent. Zool. 21: 500–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takasu, K., and Hirose, Y.. 1988. Host discrimination in the parasitoid Ooencyrtus nezarae: the role of the egg stalk as an external marker. Entomologia exp. appl. 47: 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S.N. 1986. Effect of the insect parasite Hyposoter exiguae (Viereck) on the carbohydrate metabolism of its host, Trichoplusia ni (Hübner). J. Insect Physiol. 32: 287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Völkl, W., and Mackauer, M.. 1990. Age-specific pattern of host discrimination by the aphid parasitoid Ephedrus californicus Baker (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Can. Ent. 122: 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waage, J.K. 1986. Family planning in parasitoids: adaptive patterns of progeny and sex allocation. pp. 63–95in Waage, J., and Greathead, D. (Eds.). Insect Parasitoids. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Waage, J.K., and Godfray, H.C.J.. 1985. Reproductive strategies and population ecology of insect parasitoids. pp. 449–470in Sibly, R.M., and Smith, R.H. (Eds.), Behavioural Ecology. Ecological Consequences of Adaptive Behaviour. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wahab, W.A. 1985. Observations on the biology and behaviour of Aphelinus abdominalis Dalm. (Hym., Aphelinidae), a parasite of aphids. Z. angew. Ent. 100: 290–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilbert, H. 1964. Das Ausleseverhalten von Aphelinus semiflavus Howard und die Abwehrreaktionen seiner Wirte (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Beitr. Ent. 14: 159–219.Google Scholar
Wylie, H.G. 1965. Discrimination between parasitized and unparasitized housefly pupae by females of Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Can. Ent. 97: 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar