Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:48:01.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First Nearctic record of Diolcogaster claritibia (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Microgastrinae), with notes on taxonomic status and natural history

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2014

Jose Fernandez-Triana ,
Mark R. Shaw ,
Sophie Cardinal ,
Lloyd Dosdall  and
Peter Mason
Jose Fernandez-Triana*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Mark R. Shaw
Affiliation:
National Museums of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EH1 1JF, United Kingdom
Sophie Cardinal
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
Lloyd Dosdall
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
Peter Mason
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, K.W. Neatby Building, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Microgastrinae wasp Diolcogaster claritibia (Papp, 1959) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), is recorded from the Nearctic region (Alberta, Manitoba, and Ontario, Canada) for the first time. In spite of some minor morphological and molecular (DNA barcoding) differences, the available data indicate that the European and New World specimens should be considered one species, but more specimens and loci need to be sampled to conclusively determine the phylogeographic history of the species. Diolcogaster claritibia seems to be widely distributed within the Holarctic, and the molecular data suggest that it was recently introduced to North America from Europe.

Type
Systematics & Morphology
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 146 , Issue 6 , December 2014 , pp. 609 - 620
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Kevin Floate

References

Clement, M., Posada, D., and Crandall, K. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology, 9: 1657–1660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darriba, D., Taboada, G.L., Doallo, R., and Posada, D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods, 9: 772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drummond, A.J., Ashton, B., Buxton, S., Cheung, M., Cooper, A., Duran, C., et al. 2011. Geneious v6.0.5. Available from www.geneious.com [accessed 30 September 2013].Google Scholar
Huber, J.T. and Sharkey, M.J. 1993. Structure. In Hymenoptera of the world: an identification guide to families. Monograph No. 1894E. Edited by H. Goulet and J.T. Huber. Agriculture Canada Research Branch, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Pp. 13–59.Google Scholar
Hudson, R.R. 1990. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 7: 1–44.Google Scholar
Ivanova, N.V., Dewaard, J.R., and Hebert, P.D.N. 2006. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6: 998–1002. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01428.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, W.R.M. 1981. The polyphyletic nature of Apanteles Foerster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): a phylogeny and reclassification of Microgastrinae. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 115: 1–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, G.E.J. 1965. A reclassification of the tribe Microgasterinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology supplement, 2: 1–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papp, J. 1959. The Microgaster Latr., Microplitis Först., and Hygroplitis Thoms., species of the Carpathian basin (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Annales Historico-naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, 51: 397–413.Google Scholar
Papp, J. 1981. Contributions to the braconid fauna of Hungary, III. Opiinae and Microgasterinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Folia Entomologica Hungarica, 42: 127–141.Google Scholar
Rambaut, A. and Drummond, A.J. 2009. Tracer v1.5 [online]. Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer [accessed 30 September 2013].Google Scholar
Rambaut, A. and Drummond, A.J. 2013. TreeAnnotator v1.7.0 [online]. Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk [accessed 30 September 2013].Google Scholar
Ronquist, F. and Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19: 1572–1574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saitou, N. and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4: 406–425.Google Scholar
Shaw, M.R. 1994. Parasitoid host ranges. In Parasitoid community ecology. Edited by B. A. Hawkins and W. Sheehan. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. Pp. 111–144.Google Scholar
Smith, M.A., Fernández-Triana, J.L., Eveleigh, E., Gómez, J., Guclu, C., Hallwachs, W., et al. 2013. DNA barcoding and the taxonomy of Microgastrinae wasps (Hymenoptera, Braconidae): impacts after 8 years and nearly 20000 sequences. Molecular Ecology Resources, 13: 168–176. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.A., Rodriguez, J.J., Whitfield, J.B., Deans, A.R., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W., et al. 2008. Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology, and collections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105: 12359–12364. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805319105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M.A., Wood, D.M., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W., and Hebert, P.D.N. 2007. DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104: 4967–4972. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700050104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.A., Woodley, N.E., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W., and Hebert, P.D.N. 2006. DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103: 3657–3662. doi:10.1073/pnas.0511318103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamura, K. and Nei, M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10: 512–526.Google ScholarPubMed
Templeton, A.R., Crandall, K.A., and Sing, C.F. 1992. A cladistics analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics, 132: 619–633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitfield, J.B. 1997. Subfamily Microgastrinae. In Manual of the New World genera of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Special Publication No. 1. Edited by R.A. Wharton, P.M. Marsh, and M.J. Sharkey. International Society of Hymenopterists, Washington, DC, United States of America. Pp. 333–364.Google Scholar
Yu, D.S.K., van Achterberg, C., and Horstmann, K. 2012. Taxapad 2012, Ichneumonoidea 2011. Database on flash-drive. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Available from www.taxapad.com [accessed 9 February 2014].Google Scholar