Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:14:16.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Temperature on Development of Overwintering Pupae of the Apple Maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. T. A. Neilson
W. T. A. Neilson
Affiliation:
Entomology and Plant Pathology Section, Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Frederkton, N.B.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The apple maggot overwinters as a pupa within a puparium and develops to this stage in the fall five days after the larva enters the ground. It usually undergoes no visible morphological change until late the following spring or early summer (Dean, 1942). The adult emerges from late June to early September. Some pupae, however, remain dormant in the soil and the adults do not emerge until the second or third summer after pupation (Lathrop, 1955). Also, in some areas, a few adults emerge about two months after pupation (Phipps and Dirks, 193 3).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 94 , Issue 9 , September 1962 , pp. 924 - 928
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dean, R. W. 1942. Development of the female reproductive system in Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh) (Diptera: Trypetidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. America 35: 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frick, K. E., Simkover, H. G., and Telford, H. S.. 1954. Bionomics of the cherry fruit flies in eastern Washington. Washington Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 13: 32.Google Scholar
Lathrop, F. H. 1955. Apple insects in Maine. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 540: 7–16.Google Scholar
Phipps, C. R., and Dirks, C. O.. 1933. Notes on the biology of the apple maggot. J. Econ. Ent. 26: 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar